PURPOSE: To identify the barriers to glaucoma follow-up and to assess how ethnicity influences the effect of such barriers among patients in a county hospital population. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 152 patients, 76 with poor clinic follow-up and 76 with good clinic follow-up, who were recruited at the San Francisco General Hospital glaucoma clinic as part of a case-control study. All subjects were required to be established patients with glaucoma initially seen and diagnosed in the clinic at least 1 year before enrollment. An oral questionnaire pertaining to the barriers to follow-up for glaucoma, as well as patient ethnicity, was administered to all participating subjects. The main outcome measure was the prevalence of significant barriers to follow-up, both overall and stratified by ethnicity. RESULTS: The most prevalent barriers to follow-up included long clinic waiting times (75%), appointment scheduling difficulties (38%), the effect of other medical or physical comorbidities (29%), and difficulties related to medical interpretation (23%). While several barriers were cited as being important across different ethnicities, Latinos and Asian-Pacific Islanders were particularly affected by difficulties related to medical interpretation (P = 0.0001) and long waiting times in the clinic (P = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: Understanding patient-reported barriers to glaucoma follow-up and their variation based on ethnicity may give providers insight as to why patients do not adhere to follow-up recommendations. Strategies to improve follow-up may include reduced clinic wait times, simplified appointment scheduling, and provision of appropriate education and counseling regardless of the patient's native language and ethnicity.
PURPOSE: To identify the barriers to glaucoma follow-up and to assess how ethnicity influences the effect of such barriers among patients in a county hospital population. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 152 patients, 76 with poor clinic follow-up and 76 with good clinic follow-up, who were recruited at the San Francisco General Hospital glaucoma clinic as part of a case-control study. All subjects were required to be established patients with glaucoma initially seen and diagnosed in the clinic at least 1 year before enrollment. An oral questionnaire pertaining to the barriers to follow-up for glaucoma, as well as patient ethnicity, was administered to all participating subjects. The main outcome measure was the prevalence of significant barriers to follow-up, both overall and stratified by ethnicity. RESULTS: The most prevalent barriers to follow-up included long clinic waiting times (75%), appointment scheduling difficulties (38%), the effect of other medical or physical comorbidities (29%), and difficulties related to medical interpretation (23%). While several barriers were cited as being important across different ethnicities, Latinos and Asian-Pacific Islanders were particularly affected by difficulties related to medical interpretation (P = 0.0001) and long waiting times in the clinic (P = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: Understanding patient-reported barriers to glaucoma follow-up and their variation based on ethnicity may give providers insight as to why patients do not adhere to follow-up recommendations. Strategies to improve follow-up may include reduced clinic wait times, simplified appointment scheduling, and provision of appropriate education and counseling regardless of the patient's native language and ethnicity.
Entities:
Keywords:
barriers to follow-up; clinical follow-up; compliance; ethnicity
Authors: Michelle R Hribar; Sarah Read-Brown; Leah Reznick; Lorinna Lombardi; Mansi Parikh; Thomas R Yackel; Michael F Chiang Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc Date: 2015-11-05
Authors: Michelle R Hribar; Sarah Read-Brown; Isaac H Goldstein; Leah G Reznick; Lorinna Lombardi; Mansi Parikh; Winston Chamberlain; Michael F Chiang Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2018-01-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Paula A Newman-Casey; John A Musser; Leslie M Niziol; Michele M Heisler; Shivani S Kamat; Manjool M Shah; Nish Patel; Amy M Cohn Journal: J Glaucoma Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Paula Anne Newman-Casey; John Musser; Leslie M Niziol; Kerby Shedden; David Burke; Amy Cohn Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2020-04-24 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Benjamin E Leiby; Sarah E Hegarty; Tingting Zhan; Jonathan S Myers; L Jay Katz; Julia A Haller; Michael Waisbourd; Christine Burns; Meskerem Divers; Jeanne Molineaux; Jeffrey Henderer; Charles Brodowski; Lisa A Hark Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2021-05-20 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Lisa A Hark; Deiana M Johnson; Giuliana Berardi; Neal S Patel; Lichuan Zeng; Yang Dai; Eileen L Mayro; Michael Waisbourd; L Jay Katz Journal: Patient Prefer Adherence Date: 2016-09-08 Impact factor: 2.711
Authors: Adam B Dobbins; John Krumme; Monica Gaddis; Shin Hye Park; Manna Varghese; Michael R Brancato; Christopher M Shaw; Karen Wambach Journal: West J Emerg Med Date: 2020-08-20