Literature DB >> 23981959

Comparative study of the mutant prevention concentrations of vancomycin alone and in combination with levofloxacin, rifampicin and fosfomycin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis.

Li-guang Liu1, Yu-lin Zhu1, Li-fen Hu1, Jun Cheng1, Ying Ye2, Jia-bin Li2.   

Abstract

No mutant-prevention concentration (MPC) with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE) has been reported. The study aimed to evaluate the propensity of vancomycin individually and in combination to prevent MRSE from mutation. A total of 10 MRSE clinical isolates were included in the study. Susceptibility testing demonstrated that the susceptibility rates to vancomycin, rifampicin, levofloxacin and fosfomycin were 100, 100, 50 and 90%, respectively. The fractional inhibition concentration indices (FICI) for vancomycin combined with rifampicin, levofloxacin or fosfomycin were ≥1.5 but ≤2, ≥1.5 but ≤2, and >0.5 but ≤1.5, respectively, implying indifferent interactivity. The MPC with susceptible strains was determined to be the lowest antibiotic concentration inhibiting visible growth among 10(10) CFU on four agar plates (9 cm in diameter) after a 72-h incubation at 37°C. The MPCs were 16~32, >64, ≥64 and 4~16 μg ml(-1) for vancomycin, rifampicin, fosfomycin and levofloxacin, respectively. The vancomycin MPCs of combinations with fosfomycin (32 μg ml(-1)), levofloxacin (2 μg ml(-1)) and rifampicin (2 or 4 μg ml(-1)) were 1~4, 16~32 and 16~32 μg ml(-1), respectively. Against mutants selected by vancomycin, rifampicin, levofloxacin and fosfomycin individually, antibiotics had standard MICs of 2~4 μg ml(-1) for vancomycin, >64 μg ml(-1) for rifampicin, 4~8 μg ml(-1) for levofloxacin and 64 μg ml(-1) for fosfomycin. Thus single-step mutation can lead to resistance of MRSE to rifampicin, levofloxacin and fosfomycin, rather than non-susceptibility to vancomycin. Vancomycin-fosfomycin combination might be a superior alternative to vancomycin in blocking the growth of MRSE mutants, especially for high-organism-burden infections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23981959     DOI: 10.1038/ja.2013.87

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antibiot (Tokyo)        ISSN: 0021-8820            Impact factor:   2.649


  5 in total

Review 1.  Individualising Therapy to Minimize Bacterial Multidrug Resistance.

Authors:  A J Heffernan; F B Sime; J Lipman; J A Roberts
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Fosfomycin.

Authors:  Matthew E Falagas; Evridiki K Vouloumanou; George Samonis; Konstantinos Z Vardakas
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  Validation of the mutant selection window hypothesis with fosfomycin against Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa: an in vitro and in vivo comparative study.

Authors:  Ai-Jun Pan; Qing Mei; Ying Ye; Hong-Ru Li; Bao Liu; Jia-Bin Li
Journal:  J Antibiot (Tokyo)       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Mutant prevention concentration of ozenoxacin for quinolone-susceptible or -resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis.

Authors:  Y López; M Tato; D Gargallo-Viola; R Cantón; J Vila; I Zsolt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Synergistic combination of two antimicrobial agents closing each other's mutant selection windows to prevent antimicrobial resistance.

Authors:  Xuejie Xu; Li Xu; Ganjun Yuan; Yimin Wang; Yunqiu Qu; Meijing Zhou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.