OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a swallow preservation protocol (SPP) in which patients received swallow therapy before, during, and after radiation treatment and its efficacy in maintaining swallowing function in head and neck cancer patients. DESIGN: Case series with chart review. SETTING: Tertiary care academic medical center. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Eighty-five patients who received radiation (RT) or chemoradiation (CRT) participated in the SPP from 2007 to 2012. Subjects were divided into 2 groups: compliant and noncompliant with SPP. At each SPP visit, the diet of each patient was recorded as regular (chewable), puree, liquid, or gastrostomy tube (G-tube) dependent, along with their compliance with the swallow exercises. Patients were stratified by age, gender, tumor stage, type of treatment, radiation dose, diet change, dysguesia, odynophagia, pain, and stenosis. Statistical analysis was performed comparing the 2 compliance groups in regards to swallowing-related outcomes at 1 month after completion of therapy. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients were compliant and 28 were noncompliant with SPP during treatment. The compliant group had a higher percentage of patients tolerating a regular diet (54.4% vs 21.4%, P = .008), a lower G-tube dependence (22.8% vs 53.6%, P = .008), and a higher rate of maintaining or improving their diet (54.4% vs 25.0%, P = .025) compared to noncompliant patients. CONCLUSION: A swallow preservation protocol appears to help maintain or improve swallow function in head and neck cancer patients undergoing RT or CRT. Patients who are able to comply with swallow exercises are less likely to worsen their diet, receive a G-tube, or develop stenosis.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a swallow preservation protocol (SPP) in which patients received swallow therapy before, during, and after radiation treatment and its efficacy in maintaining swallowing function in head and neck cancerpatients. DESIGN: Case series with chart review. SETTING: Tertiary care academic medical center. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Eighty-five patients who received radiation (RT) or chemoradiation (CRT) participated in the SPP from 2007 to 2012. Subjects were divided into 2 groups: compliant and noncompliant with SPP. At each SPP visit, the diet of each patient was recorded as regular (chewable), puree, liquid, or gastrostomy tube (G-tube) dependent, along with their compliance with the swallow exercises. Patients were stratified by age, gender, tumor stage, type of treatment, radiation dose, diet change, dysguesia, odynophagia, pain, and stenosis. Statistical analysis was performed comparing the 2 compliance groups in regards to swallowing-related outcomes at 1 month after completion of therapy. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients were compliant and 28 were noncompliant with SPP during treatment. The compliant group had a higher percentage of patients tolerating a regular diet (54.4% vs 21.4%, P = .008), a lower G-tube dependence (22.8% vs 53.6%, P = .008), and a higher rate of maintaining or improving their diet (54.4% vs 25.0%, P = .025) compared to noncompliant patients. CONCLUSION: A swallow preservation protocol appears to help maintain or improve swallow function in head and neck cancerpatients undergoing RT or CRT. Patients who are able to comply with swallow exercises are less likely to worsen their diet, receive a G-tube, or develop stenosis.
Entities:
Keywords:
radiation and swallow; swallow preservation; swallow therapy
Authors: Walter T Lee; Lee M Akst; David J Adelstein; Jerrod P Saxton; Benjamin G Wood; Marshall Strome; Robert S Butler; Ramon M Esclamado Journal: Head Neck Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 3.147
Authors: William R Carroll; Julie L Locher; Cheri L Canon; Isaac A Bohannon; Nancy L McColloch; J Scott Magnuson Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: Brian Daniel Kulbersh; Eben L Rosenthal; Benjamin M McGrew; Ryan D Duncan; Nancy L McColloch; William R Carroll; J S Magnuson Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: C L Lazarus; J A Logemann; B R Pauloski; L A Colangelo; P J Kahrilas; B B Mittal; M Pierce Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 1996-09 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: Barbara Roa Pauloski; Alfred W Rademaker; Jerilyn A Logemann; Cathy L Lazarus; Lisa Newman; Annette Hamner; Ellen MacCracken; Joy Gaziano; Linda Stachowiak Journal: Head Neck Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 3.147
Authors: Laurelie R Wall; Sanjeewa Kularatna; Elizabeth C Ward; Bena Cartmill; Anne J Hill; Elizabeth Isenring; Joshua Byrnes; Sandro V Porceddu Journal: Dysphagia Date: 2018-12-04 Impact factor: 3.438
Authors: Laura W J Baijens; Margaret Walshe; Leena-Maija Aaltonen; Christoph Arens; Reinie Cordier; Patrick Cras; Lise Crevier-Buchman; Chris Curtis; Wojciech Golusinski; Roganie Govender; Jesper Grau Eriksen; Kevin Hansen; Kate Heathcote; Markus M Hess; Sefik Hosal; Jens Peter Klussmann; C René Leemans; Denise MacCarthy; Beatrice Manduchi; Jean-Paul Marie; Reza Nouraei; Claire Parkes; Christina Pflug; Walmari Pilz; Julie Regan; Nathalie Rommel; Antonio Schindler; Annemie M W J Schols; Renee Speyer; Giovanni Succo; Irene Wessel; Anna C H Willemsen; Taner Yilmaz; Pere Clavé Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2020-12-19 Impact factor: 2.503