AIM: To investigate whether overlapping blood pressure and heart rate graphs improve chart-users' ability to recognize derangements in these vital signs on hospital observation charts. BACKGROUND: Many health professionals prefer blood pressure and heart rate graphs to overlap. One justification is the use of a visual cue called the 'Seagull Sign' to detect physiological abnormalities. DESIGN: A 3 × 2 × 2 mixed-design experiment, with three independent variables: participant group, graph format (separate vs. overlapping) and alerting system (integrated colour-based track-and-trigger system present vs. absent). METHODS: Over 64 experimental trials, 'Seagull-trained' nurses and novices randomly assigned to receive 'Seagull training' or remain untrained, viewed sequences of blood pressure and heart rate observations recorded on four different chart design extracts. The designs represented a crossing of the graph format and alerting system variables. For each design, eight cases contained normal data and eight contained an abnormal systolic blood pressure or heart rate observation (half of which yielded a Seagull Sign on overlapping plots). Participants (tested between January-May 2011) judged whether observations were physiologically normal or abnormal. RESULTS: Across all cases, participants from all groups responded faster and made fewer errors when blood pressure and heart rate observations were graphed separately, especially when a track-and-trigger system was present. Even for 'Seagull-trained' participants viewing 'Seagull Sign available' cases, no advantage of overlapping graphs was found. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that overlapping graphs do not yield the performance advantage that many health professionals assume, either for novices or experienced nurses, even when the Seagull Sign is used.
RCT Entities:
AIM: To investigate whether overlapping blood pressure and heart rate graphs improve chart-users' ability to recognize derangements in these vital signs on hospital observation charts. BACKGROUND: Many health professionals prefer blood pressure and heart rate graphs to overlap. One justification is the use of a visual cue called the 'Seagull Sign' to detect physiological abnormalities. DESIGN: A 3 × 2 × 2 mixed-design experiment, with three independent variables: participant group, graph format (separate vs. overlapping) and alerting system (integrated colour-based track-and-trigger system present vs. absent). METHODS: Over 64 experimental trials, 'Seagull-trained' nurses and novices randomly assigned to receive 'Seagull training' or remain untrained, viewed sequences of blood pressure and heart rate observations recorded on four different chart design extracts. The designs represented a crossing of the graph format and alerting system variables. For each design, eight cases contained normal data and eight contained an abnormal systolic blood pressure or heart rate observation (half of which yielded a Seagull Sign on overlapping plots). Participants (tested between January-May 2011) judged whether observations were physiologically normal or abnormal. RESULTS: Across all cases, participants from all groups responded faster and made fewer errors when blood pressure and heart rate observations were graphed separately, especially when a track-and-trigger system was present. Even for 'Seagull-trained' participants viewing 'Seagull Sign available' cases, no advantage of overlapping graphs was found. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that overlapping graphs do not yield the performance advantage that many health professionals assume, either for novices or experienced nurses, even when the Seagull Sign is used.
Authors: Doug Elliott; Sharon McKinley; Lin Perry; Christine Duffield; Rick Iedema; Robyn Gallagher; Margaret Fry; Michael Roche; Emily Allen Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2014-08-12