Erin Keely1, Clare Liddy, Amir Afkham. 1. 1 Division of Endocrinology/Metabolism, The Ottawa Hospital , Ottawa, Ontario, Canada .
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Access to specialist advice remains a barrier for primary care providers (PCPs) and their patients. Virtual consultations have been used to expedite access. There are few studies demonstrating the utilization and impact of such services. We established a regional e-consultation service that was used across a wide range of specialty services and PCPs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively collected all e-consultations submitted from April 1, 2011 to June 30, 2012. Utilization data collected included number of e-consultations submitted, specialist response, and time required for the specialist to complete the e-consultation. Perceived benefit to the PCPs and their patients and the impact on care delivery were determined from a close-out survey. RESULTS: Fifty-nine PCPs submitted 406 e-consultations to 16 specialty services. The specialist provided an answer without requesting further information in 89% of cases, with >90% of cases taking <15 min for the specialist to complete. Seventy-five percent of cases were answered in <3 days. The service was perceived as highly beneficial to providers and patients in>90% of cases. In 43% of submitted cases a traditional referral was originally contemplated but was now avoided. CONCLUSIONS: We successfully implemented an e-consultation service across diverse PCPs and specialty services that was highly valued. Almost half of referrals submitted would have required a face-to-face consultation if the service had not been available. Thus e-consultation has tremendous potential for improving access to specialist advice in a much more timely manner than the traditional referral-consultation process.
BACKGROUND: Access to specialist advice remains a barrier for primary care providers (PCPs) and their patients. Virtual consultations have been used to expedite access. There are few studies demonstrating the utilization and impact of such services. We established a regional e-consultation service that was used across a wide range of specialty services and PCPs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively collected all e-consultations submitted from April 1, 2011 to June 30, 2012. Utilization data collected included number of e-consultations submitted, specialist response, and time required for the specialist to complete the e-consultation. Perceived benefit to the PCPs and their patients and the impact on care delivery were determined from a close-out survey. RESULTS: Fifty-nine PCPs submitted 406 e-consultations to 16 specialty services. The specialist provided an answer without requesting further information in 89% of cases, with >90% of cases taking <15 min for the specialist to complete. Seventy-five percent of cases were answered in <3 days. The service was perceived as highly beneficial to providers and patients in>90% of cases. In 43% of submitted cases a traditional referral was originally contemplated but was now avoided. CONCLUSIONS: We successfully implemented an e-consultation service across diverse PCPs and specialty services that was highly valued. Almost half of referrals submitted would have required a face-to-face consultation if the service had not been available. Thus e-consultation has tremendous potential for improving access to specialist advice in a much more timely manner than the traditional referral-consultation process.
Authors: John Stoves; John Connolly; Chee Kay Cheung; Angela Grange; Penny Rhodes; Donal O'Donoghue; John Wright Journal: Qual Saf Health Care Date: 2010-06-16
Authors: Nina Eminović; Nicolette F de Keizer; Jeremy C Wyatt; Gerben ter Riet; Niels Peek; Henk C van Weert; Carla A Bruijnzeel-Koomen; Patrick J E Bindels Journal: Arch Dermatol Date: 2009-05
Authors: Judy E Kim-Hwang; Alice Hm Chen; Douglas S Bell; David Guzman; Hal F Yee; Margot B Kushel Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2010-05-29 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: J Nwando Olayiwola; Daren Anderson; Nicole Jepeal; Robert Aseltine; Christopher Pickett; Jun Yan; Ianita Zlateva Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Michael L Barnett; Ateev Mehrotra; Joseph P Frolkis; Melissa Spinks; Casey Steiger; Brandon Hehir; Jeffrey O Greenberg; Hardeep Singh Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Malhar P Patel; Priscille Schettini; Colin P O'Leary; Hayden B Bosworth; John B Anderson; Kevin P Shah Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2018-03-12 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: James Milligan; Joseph Lee; Matt Smith; Lindsay Donaldson; Peter Athanasopoulos; Kent Bassett-Spiers; Jeremy Howcroft; Jennifer W Howcroft; Tara Jeji; Phalgun B Joshi; Upender Mehan; Vanessa Noonan Journal: J Spinal Cord Med Date: 2018-12-17 Impact factor: 1.985