BACKGROUND: The field of telepsychiatry has rapidly advanced a focus on decreasing health disparities by improving access to mental healthcare for children and adolescents. However, perfecting the quality and effectiveness of telemental healthcare is an ongoing process in the face of various documented barriers. Although consumer and provider satisfactions have been investigated in the telepsychiatry literature, perspectives of psychiatrists who consult with schools have been relatively understudied. The current study focuses on the utilization of telepsychiatry consultation to school mental health providers, by reporting on the perspectives of psychiatrists who provide consultation services. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using quantitative and qualitative data, the psychiatrists' perspectives about their consultation experiences were examined and compared with previously obtained data from school mental health providers about their experiences with the telepsychiatry consultation. RESULTS: Results indicate positive provider experiences with telepsychiatry, including reports that students were more likely to disclose clinical information via video compared with face-to-face contact. However, concerns regarding technological difficulties, logistics, and information sharing were endorsed by some of the psychiatrists. Comparison with clinician reports revealed many similarities; however, differences were noted in regard to the psychiatrists' ability to communicate with the students and their level of preparedness for the consultations. CONCLUSIONS: Recommendations for ongoing evaluation and implementation of effective telepsychiatry consultation for schools are provided. Improvements in communication, scheduling, and addressing technological difficulties within the consultation team through training and consultation are recommended. Future directions for including student, caregiver, and other provider perspectives are also discussed.
BACKGROUND: The field of telepsychiatry has rapidly advanced a focus on decreasing health disparities by improving access to mental healthcare for children and adolescents. However, perfecting the quality and effectiveness of telemental healthcare is an ongoing process in the face of various documented barriers. Although consumer and provider satisfactions have been investigated in the telepsychiatry literature, perspectives of psychiatrists who consult with schools have been relatively understudied. The current study focuses on the utilization of telepsychiatry consultation to school mental health providers, by reporting on the perspectives of psychiatrists who provide consultation services. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using quantitative and qualitative data, the psychiatrists' perspectives about their consultation experiences were examined and compared with previously obtained data from school mental health providers about their experiences with the telepsychiatry consultation. RESULTS: Results indicate positive provider experiences with telepsychiatry, including reports that students were more likely to disclose clinical information via video compared with face-to-face contact. However, concerns regarding technological difficulties, logistics, and information sharing were endorsed by some of the psychiatrists. Comparison with clinician reports revealed many similarities; however, differences were noted in regard to the psychiatrists' ability to communicate with the students and their level of preparedness for the consultations. CONCLUSIONS: Recommendations for ongoing evaluation and implementation of effective telepsychiatry consultation for schools are provided. Improvements in communication, scheduling, and addressing technological difficulties within the consultation team through training and consultation are recommended. Future directions for including student, caregiver, and other provider perspectives are also discussed.
Authors: Lea Meininger; Julia Adam; Elena von Wirth; Paula Viefhaus; Katrin Woitecki; Daniel Walter; Manfred Döpfner Journal: Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health Date: 2022-07-28 Impact factor: 7.494