Literature DB >> 23980749

Magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging-directed transrectal ultrasound biopsy increases prostate cancer detection in men with prostate-specific antigen between 4-10 ng/mL and normal digital rectal examination.

Tarun Dilip Javali1, Durgesh Kumar Dwivedi, Rajeev Kumar, Naranamangalam Raghunathan Jagannathan, Sanjay Thulkar, Amit Kumar Dinda.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the ability of magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging to improve prostate cancer detection rate.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis was carried out of 278 men with prostate-specific antigen in the range of 4-10 ng/mL and normal digital rectal examination who underwent transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy. Outcomes were compared between men who had a standard biopsy versus those who also underwent a prebiopsy magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging. Men with an abnormal voxel on magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging had standard transrectal ultrasound biopsies plus biopsies directed to the abnormal voxels.
RESULTS: The study group (n = 140) and control group (n = 138) were similar in baseline parameters, such as mean age, prostate size and mean prostate-specific antigen. The overall cancer detection in the magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging positive group (24.4%) was more than double that of the control group (10.1%). On comparing the magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging results with the transrectal ultrasound biopsy findings, magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging had 95.6% sensitivity, 41.9% specificity, a positive predictive value of 24.4%, a negative predictive value of 98% and an accuracy of 51.4%.
CONCLUSIONS: Magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging-directed transrectal ultrasound biopsy increases the cancer detection rate compared with standard transrectal ultrasound biopsy in patients with normal digital rectal examination and elevated prostate-specific antigen in the range of 4-10 ng/mL.
© 2013 The Japanese Urological Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging; prostate cancer; transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23980749     DOI: 10.1111/iju.12258

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Urol        ISSN: 0919-8172            Impact factor:   3.369


  8 in total

Review 1.  Metabolic Vulnerabilities of Prostate Cancer: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Opportunities.

Authors:  Giorgia Zadra; Massimo Loda
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 6.915

Review 2.  Multiparametric-MRI in diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sangeet Ghai; Masoom A Haider
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep

Review 3.  Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer: A review and update for urologists.

Authors:  Sangjun Yoo; Jeong Kon Kim; In Gab Jeong
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2015-06-30

Review 4.  A systematic review on multiparametric MR imaging in prostate cancer detection.

Authors:  Roberta Fusco; Mario Sansone; Vincenza Granata; Sergio Venanzio Setola; Antonella Petrillo
Journal:  Infect Agent Cancer       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 2.965

5.  Magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging in diagnosis of suspicious prostate cancer: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Weiguo Cai; Dongyong Zhu; Sama Byanju; Jie Chen; Hanfei Zhang; Yanfang Wang; Meiyan Liao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  MicroRNA‑106b functions as an oncogene and regulates tumor viability and metastasis by targeting LARP4B in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Weiqi Yin; Junfeng Chen; Guoyao Wang; Dongxu Zhang
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 2.952

7.  Accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing prostate Cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Liang Zhen; Xiaoqiang Liu; Chen Yegang; Yang Yongjiao; Xu Yawei; Kang Jiaqi; Wang Xianhao; Song Yuxuan; Hu Rui; Zhang Wei; Ou Ningjing
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Raised prostate-specific antigen alone may not be a true predictor in high-risk prostate cancer: A retrospective cohort analysis.

Authors:  Harshit Garg; Amlesh Seth; Rajeev Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2022-01-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.