C N Menezes1, N J Crowther, R Duarte, D Van Amsterdam, D Evans, C Dickens, T Dix-Peek, M Rassool, A Prinsloo, F Raal, I Sanne. 1. Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Chris Hani Baragwanath Hospital, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa; Clinical HIV Research Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Helen Joseph Hospital, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Low-dose stavudine therapy may have a lower toxicity profile compared with standard dose. A randomized controlled trial comparing these two doses of stavudine with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (tenofovir DF) was performed to assess the effects on anthropometry, markers of inflammation, and lipid and glucose metabolism in Black South African patients. METHODS:Sixty patients were randomized 1:1:1 to either standard-dose (30-40 mg) or low-dose (20-30 mg) stavudine or tenofovir DF (300 mg), each combined with lamivudine and efavirenz, for 48 weeks. Anthropometry, markers of inflammation, and lipid and glucose metabolism were assessed using standard techniques. RESULTS: In all three treatment arms, there was a significant increase in lipid levels over the study period. At 48 weeks, fasting glucose level (P < 0.005) and homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) score (P < 0.05) increased significantly in the standard-dose stavudine arm, as did insulin and C-peptide levels in both the standard- and low-dose stavudine arms. At week 48, a significant decrease (P < 0.05) in adiponectin was noted in the standard-dose stavudine arm, but there was an increase (P < 0.005) in the tenofovir DF arm. In both the stavudine arms, significant increases in anthropometric measures occurred at 24 weeks but these decreased by week 48. Mitochondrial toxicities occurred in both the stavudine arms. Immunological and virological outcomes were similar for all three arms. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the occurrence of metabolic abnormalities with both stavudine and tenofovir DF treatment. Awareness of the potential increased cardiovascular risk should be of concern with the use of both these therapies.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: Low-dose stavudine therapy may have a lower toxicity profile compared with standard dose. A randomized controlled trial comparing these two doses of stavudine with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (tenofovir DF) was performed to assess the effects on anthropometry, markers of inflammation, and lipid and glucose metabolism in Black South African patients. METHODS: Sixty patients were randomized 1:1:1 to either standard-dose (30-40 mg) or low-dose (20-30 mg) stavudine or tenofovir DF (300 mg), each combined with lamivudine and efavirenz, for 48 weeks. Anthropometry, markers of inflammation, and lipid and glucose metabolism were assessed using standard techniques. RESULTS: In all three treatment arms, there was a significant increase in lipid levels over the study period. At 48 weeks, fasting glucose level (P < 0.005) and homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) score (P < 0.05) increased significantly in the standard-dose stavudine arm, as did insulin and C-peptide levels in both the standard- and low-dose stavudine arms. At week 48, a significant decrease (P < 0.05) in adiponectin was noted in the standard-dose stavudine arm, but there was an increase (P < 0.005) in the tenofovir DF arm. In both the stavudine arms, significant increases in anthropometric measures occurred at 24 weeks but these decreased by week 48. Mitochondrial toxicities occurred in both the stavudine arms. Immunological and virological outcomes were similar for all three arms. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the occurrence of metabolic abnormalities with both stavudine and tenofovir DF treatment. Awareness of the potential increased cardiovascular risk should be of concern with the use of both these therapies.
Authors: Alana T Brennan; Mary-Ann Davies; Jacob Bor; Gilles Wandeler; Kathryn Stinson; Robin Wood; Hans Prozesky; Frank Tanser; Geoffrey Fatti; Andrew Boulle; Izukanji Sikazwe; Kara Wool-Kaloustian; Constantin Yuannoutsos; Valériane Leroy; Nathalie de Rekeneire; Matthew P Fox Journal: AIDS Date: 2017-01-02 Impact factor: 4.632
Authors: Eugene Mutimura; Donald R Hoover; Qiuhu Shi; Jean Claude Dusingize; Jean D'Amour Sinayobye; Mardge Cohen; Kathryn Anastos Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-04-16 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Nazik Elmalaika Husain; Sufian K Noor; Wadie M Elmadhoun; Ahmed O Almobarak; Heitham Awadalla; Clare L Woodward; Dushyant Mital; Mohamed H Ahmed Journal: HIV AIDS (Auckl) Date: 2017-11-08
Authors: Alemayehu Amberbir; Victor Singano; Alfred Matengeni; Zahra Ismail; Gift Kawalazira; Adrienne K Chan; Sumeet D Sodhi; Joep J van Oosterhout Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-05-21 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Kristine M Erlandson; Sineenart Taejaroenkul; Laura Smeaton; Amita Gupta; Isaac L Singini; Javier R Lama; Rosie Mngqibisa; Cynthia Firnhaber; Sandra Wagner Cardoso; Cecilia Kanyama; Andre L Machado da Silva; James G Hakim; Nagalingeswaran Kumarasamy; Thomas B Campbell; Michael D Hughes Journal: Open Forum Infect Dis Date: 2015-06-24 Impact factor: 3.835
Authors: Willem Daniel Francois Venter; Andrew Kambugu; Matthew F Chersich; Stephen Becker; Andrew Hill; Natasha Arulappan; Michelle Moorhouse; Mohammed Majam; Godspower Akpomiemie; Simiso Sokhela; Selvamuthu Poongulali; Charles Feldman; Chris Duncombe; David H Brown Ripin; Alinda Vos; Nagalingeswaran Kumarasamy Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2019-02-01 Impact factor: 3.731