Literature DB >> 23980532

Functional and oncologic outcomes of graded bladder neck preservation during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Ziho Lee1, Shailen S Sehgal, Reid V Graves, Yu-Kai Su, Elton Llukani, Kelly Monahan, Alice McGill, Daniel Eun, David I Lee.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe our bladder neck dissection during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), to describe the degrees of robot-assisted bladder neck preservation (R-BNP) we have encountered, and to determine the effect of increasing R-BNP on postoperative continence and positive surgical margin (PSM) rates. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 599 patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) by a single surgeon (DIL). All bladder neck dissections were graded between 1 and 4; higher grades corresponded to an increasing degree of robot-assisted bladder neck preservation (R-BNP). After grouping patients by R-BNP grade, postoperative continence and positive surgical margin (PSM) rates were compared. The association between R-BNP and continence was also assessed using multivariate binary logistic regression models.
RESULTS: Similar outcomes were seen for two definitions of continence (0 pads per day [ppd]; 0 ppd or security pad, respectively). A higher proportion of patients were continent at 3 months postoperatively who received grade 4 compared with grade 1 (P=0.043; P=0.001) and grade 2 (P=0.006; P=0.009); and grade 3 compared with grade 1 (P=0.048; P=0.002) and grade 2 (P=0.009; P=0.030) R-BNP. There was no difference between grade 1 and 2 (P=0.541; P=0.064), and grade 3 and 4 (P=0.898; P=0.584) R-BNP. At 1 year postoperatively, there was no difference among the four groups in continence rate (P=0.771; P=0.411). R-BNP was an independent predictor of continence at 3 months (odds ratio [OR] [95% confidence interval (CI)]=1.33 [1.06-1.67]; OR [95% CI]=1.45 [1.1-1.82]), but not at 1 year (OR [95% CI]=1.07 [0.82-1.39]; OR (95% CI)=1.30 [0.92-1.85]). There was no difference among the four groups in PSM rates (P=0.946).
CONCLUSIONS: R-BNP is a graded, rather than all-or-none outcome. An increasing degree of R-BNP is associated with an earlier return to continence, without compromising oncologic outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23980532     DOI: 10.1089/end.2013.0290

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  9 in total

1.  Complete bladder neck preservation promotes long-term post-prostatectomy continence without compromising midterm oncological outcome: analysis of a randomised controlled cohort.

Authors:  Joanne N Nyarangi-Dix; Diana Tichy; Gencay Hatiboglu; Sascha Pahernik; Georgi Tosev; Markus Hohenfellner
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Recommendations on robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a Brazilian experts' consensus.

Authors:  Eliney Ferreira Faria; Carlos Vaz Melo Maciel; André Berger; Anuar Mitre; Breno Dauster; Celso Heitor Freitas; Clovis Fraga; Daher Chade; Marcos Dall'Oglio; Francisco Carvalho; Franz Campos; Gustavo Franco Carvalhal; Gustavo Caserta Lemos; Gustavo Guimarães; Hamilton Zampolli; Joao Ricardo Alves; Joao Pádua Manzano; Marco Antônio Fortes; Marcos Flavio Holanda Rocha; Mauricio Rubinstein; Murilo Luz; Pedro Romanelli; Rafael Coelho; Raphael Rocha; Roberto Dias Machado; Rodolfo Borges Dos Reis; Stenio Zequi; Romulo Guida; Valdair Muglia; Marcos Tobias-Machado
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2021-01-11

3.  Can robot-assisted radical prostatectomy be taught to chief residents and fellows without affecting operative outcomes?

Authors:  Ziho Lee; Andrew J Lightfoot; Phillip Mucksavage; David I Lee
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2015-03-21

Review 4.  Effect of Bladder Neck Preservation on Long-Term Urinary Continence after Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jong Won Kim; Do Kyung Kim; Hyun Kyu Ahn; Hae Do Jung; Joo Yong Lee; Kang Su Cho
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-11-24       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  Oncological and Functional Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Mohammed Shahait; Fawaz Al Majali; Ryan W Dobbs; Alex Sandberg; Adnan El-Achkar; Ayah El-Fahmawi; Philip Mucksavage; David I Lee
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2021 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

6.  Bladder neck sparing during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Six-year experience.

Authors:  Sercan Yilmaz; Esat Ak; Eymen Gazel; Serdar Yalcin; Kenan Yigit Yildiz; Lutfi Tunc
Journal:  North Clin Istanb       Date:  2021-05-24

7.  Combined bladder neck preservation and posterior musculofascial reconstruction during robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: effects on early and long term urinary continence recovery.

Authors:  Riccardo Bartoletti; Andrea Mogorovich; Francesco Francesca; Giorgio Pomara; Cesare Selli
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 2.264

Review 8.  Systematic Review of Studies Reporting Positive Surgical Margins After Bladder Neck Sparing Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Mariangela Bellangino; Clare Verrill; Tom Leslie; Richard W Bell; Freddie C Hamdy; Alastair D Lamb
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 3.092

9.  The effects of bladder neck sparing with an additional anterior urethral fixation on postoperative continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Eymen Gazel; Engin Kaya; Onur Acikgoz; Serdar Yalcin; Sercan Yilmaz; Cagri Aybal; Lutfi Tunc
Journal:  North Clin Istanb       Date:  2020-11-24
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.