CONTEXT: Head and neck cancers in developing countries present with advanced disease, compounded by poor access to tertiary care centers. AIM: We evaluated oral metronomic scheduling of anticancer therapy (MSAT) in advanced operable oral cancers, in conjunction with standard therapy. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This was a retrospective matched-pair analysis carried out in a tertiary referral cancer center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Advanced operable oral cancer patients having a waiting period for surgery > 3 weeks were administered MSAT. Patients then underwent standard therapy (surgery +/- adjuvant radiation/chemoradiation) as warranted by the disease, followed by MSAT maintenance therapy. Outcomes of the MSAT group were compared with stage-matched controls with similar waiting periods. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Survivals were found using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between groups using the log rank test. RESULTS: Response was seen in 75% of 32 patients. Two-year disease-free survivals (DFS) in MSAT and control groups were 86.5 and 71.6%, respectively. Two-year DFS in MSAT group who received at least three months of MSAT was 94.6% (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Oral MSAT is an economical, effective, and safe adjuvant therapy for oral cancers. It has the potential for preventing progression of the disease and improving DFS.
CONTEXT: Head and neck cancers in developing countries present with advanced disease, compounded by poor access to tertiary care centers. AIM: We evaluated oral metronomic scheduling of anticancer therapy (MSAT) in advanced operable oral cancers, in conjunction with standard therapy. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This was a retrospective matched-pair analysis carried out in a tertiary referral cancer center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Advanced operable oral cancerpatients having a waiting period for surgery > 3 weeks were administered MSAT. Patients then underwent standard therapy (surgery +/- adjuvant radiation/chemoradiation) as warranted by the disease, followed by MSAT maintenance therapy. Outcomes of the MSAT group were compared with stage-matched controls with similar waiting periods. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Survivals were found using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between groups using the log rank test. RESULTS: Response was seen in 75% of 32 patients. Two-year disease-free survivals (DFS) in MSAT and control groups were 86.5 and 71.6%, respectively. Two-year DFS in MSAT group who received at least three months of MSAT was 94.6% (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Oral MSAT is an economical, effective, and safe adjuvant therapy for oral cancers. It has the potential for preventing progression of the disease and improving DFS.
Authors: Avinash Pandey; A Desai; V Ostwal; V Patil; A Kulkarni; R Kulkarni; N Patil; D Chaukar; K Prabhash; Shripad D Banavali Journal: South Asian J Cancer Date: 2016 Apr-Jun
Authors: Gauthier Bouche; Nicolas André; Shripad Banavali; Frank Berthold; Alfredo Berruti; Guido Bocci; Giovanni Brandi; Ugo Cavallaro; Saviero Cinieri; Marco Colleoni; Giuseppe Curigliano; Teresa Di Desidero; Alexandru Eniu; Nicola Fazio; Robert Kerbel; Lisa Hutchinson; Urszula Ledzewicz; Elisabetta Munzone; Eddy Pasquier; O Graciela Scharovsky; Yuval Shaked; Jaroslav Stěrba; Martin Villalba; Francesco Bertolini Journal: Ecancermedicalscience Date: 2014-09-09
Authors: Vidisha Tuljapurkar; Harsh Dhar; Aseem Mishra; Swagnik Chakraborti; Pankaj Chaturvedi; Prathamesh S Pai Journal: South Asian J Cancer Date: 2016 Jul-Sep