Mary Bedner1, Katrice A Lippa, Susan S-C Tai. 1. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Material Measurement Laboratory, Chemical Sciences Division, United States. Electronic address: vitdqap@nist.gov.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), in collaboration with the National Institutes of Health Office of Dietary Supplements, established the first accuracy-based program for improving the comparability of vitamin D metabolite measurements, the Vitamin D Metabolites Quality Assurance Program. METHODS: The study samples were human serum or plasma Standard Reference Materials (SRMs) with 25-hydroxyvitamin D values that were determined at NIST. Participants evaluated the materials using immunoassay (IA), liquid chromatography (LC) with mass spectrometric detection, and LC with ultraviolet absorbance detection. NIST evaluated the results for concordance within the participant community as well as trueness relative to the NIST value. RESULTS: For the study materials that contain mostly 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (25(OH)D3),the coefficient of variation (CV) for the participant results was consistently in the range from 7% to 19%, and the median values were biased high relative to the NIST values. However, for materials that contain significant concentrations of both 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 (25(OH)D2) and 25(OH)D3, the median IA results were biased lower than both the LC and the NIST values, and the CV was as high as 28%. The first interlaboratory comparison results for SRM 972a Vitamin D Metabolites in Human Serum are also reported. CONCLUSIONS: Relatively large within-lab and between-lab variability hinders conclusive assessments of bias and accuracy.
BACKGROUND: The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), in collaboration with the National Institutes of Health Office of Dietary Supplements, established the first accuracy-based program for improving the comparability of vitamin D metabolite measurements, the Vitamin D Metabolites Quality Assurance Program. METHODS: The study samples were human serum or plasma Standard Reference Materials (SRMs) with 25-hydroxyvitamin D values that were determined at NIST. Participants evaluated the materials using immunoassay (IA), liquid chromatography (LC) with mass spectrometric detection, and LC with ultraviolet absorbance detection. NIST evaluated the results for concordance within the participant community as well as trueness relative to the NIST value. RESULTS: For the study materials that contain mostly 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (25(OH)D3),the coefficient of variation (CV) for the participant results was consistently in the range from 7% to 19%, and the median values were biased high relative to the NIST values. However, for materials that contain significant concentrations of both 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 (25(OH)D2) and 25(OH)D3, the median IA results were biased lower than both the LC and the NIST values, and the CV was as high as 28%. The first interlaboratory comparison results for SRM 972a Vitamin D Metabolites in Human Serum are also reported. CONCLUSIONS: Relatively large within-lab and between-lab variability hinders conclusive assessments of bias and accuracy.
Authors: Ravinder J Singh; Robert L Taylor; G Satyanarayana Reddy; Stefan K G Grebe Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2006-05-23 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Alayne D Markland; Vin Tangpricha; T Mark Beasley; Camille P Vaughan; Holly E Richter; Kathryn L Burgio; Patricia S Goode Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2018-12-21 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Anastassios G Pittas; Bess Dawson-Hughes; Patricia Sheehan; James H Ware; William C Knowler; Vanita R Aroda; Irwin Brodsky; Lisa Ceglia; Chhavi Chadha; Ranee Chatterjee; Cyrus Desouza; Rowena Dolor; John Foreyt; Paul Fuss; Adline Ghazi; Daniel S Hsia; Karen C Johnson; Sangeeta R Kashyap; Sun Kim; Erin S LeBlanc; Michael R Lewis; Emilia Liao; Lisa M Neff; Jason Nelson; Patrick O'Neil; Jean Park; Anne Peters; Lawrence S Phillips; Richard Pratley; Philip Raskin; Neda Rasouli; David Robbins; Clifford Rosen; Ellen M Vickery; Myrlene Staten Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2019-06-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ekaterina M Mineva; Rosemary L Schleicher; Madhulika Chaudhary-Webb; Khin L Maw; Julianne C Botelho; Hubert W Vesper; Christine M Pfeiffer Journal: Anal Bioanal Chem Date: 2015-05-13 Impact factor: 4.142
Authors: Matthew D Teegarden; Amanda R Campbell; Jessica L Cooperstone; Kathleen L Tober; Steven J Schwartz; Tatiana M Oberyszyn Journal: Mol Nutr Food Res Date: 2017-07-20 Impact factor: 5.914
Authors: Karen W Phinney; Susan S-C Tai; Mary Bedner; Johanna E Camara; Rosalind R C Chia; Lane C Sander; Katherine E Sharpless; Stephen A Wise; James H Yen; Rosemary L Schleicher; Madhulika Chaudhary-Webb; Khin L Maw; Yasamin Rahmani; Joseph M Betz; Joyce Merkel; Christopher T Sempos; Paul M Coates; Ramón A Durazo-Arvizu; Kurtis Sarafin; Stephen P J Brooks Journal: Anal Chem Date: 2017-04-13 Impact factor: 6.986
Authors: Matthew D Teegarden; Kenneth M Riedl; Steven J Schwartz Journal: J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci Date: 2015-04-15 Impact factor: 3.205
Authors: Michele M Schantz; Carissa D Powers; Rosemary L Schleicher; Joseph M Betz; Stephen A Wise Journal: Clin Chim Acta Date: 2016-09-20 Impact factor: 3.786
Authors: Sun H Kim; Irwin G Brodsky; Ranee Chatterjee; Sangeeta R Kashyap; William C Knowler; Emilia Liao; Jason Nelson; Richard Pratley; Neda Rasouli; Ellen M Vickery; Mark Sarnak; Anastassios G Pittas Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2021-08 Impact factor: 10.614