Literature DB >> 23978470

Distinct mechanisms control contrast adaptation over different timescales.

Min Bao1, Elizabeth Fast, Juraj Mesik, Stephen Engel.   

Abstract

Changes to the visual environment can happen at many timescales, from very transient to semi-permanent. To adapt optimally, the visual system also adjusts at different timescales, with longer-lasting environmental changes producing longer-lasting effects, but how the visual system adapts in this way remains unknown. Here, we show that contrast adaptation-the most-studied form of visual adaptation-has multiple controllers, each operating over a different time scale. In a series of experiments, subjects completed either a contrast matching, contrast detection, or tilt adjustment task, while adapting to contrast at one orientation. Following a relatively longer period (5 min) of adaptation to high contrast, subjects were "deadapted" for a shorter period (e.g., 40 s) to a lower contrast. Deadaptation eliminated perceptual aftereffects of adaptation, but continued testing in a neutral environment revealed their striking recovery. These results suggest the following account: Adaptation was controlled by at least two mechanisms, with initial adaptation affecting a longer-term one and deadaptation affecting a shorter-term one in the opposite direction. Immediately following deadaptation, the effects of the two mechanisms cancelled each other, but the short-term effects rapidly decayed, revealing ongoing longer-term adaptation. A single controlling mechanism cannot account for the observed recovery of effects, since once deadaptation cancels the initial longer-term adaptation, no trace of it remains. Combined with previous results at very long adaptation durations, the present results suggest that contrast adaptation is possibly controlled by a continuum of mechanisms acting over a large range of timescales.

Keywords:  adaptation; contrast; spontaneous recovery; timescale

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23978470     DOI: 10.1167/13.10.14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  7 in total

1.  Evaluating the performance of the staircase and quick Change Detection methods in measuring perceptual learning.

Authors:  Pan Zhang; Yukai Zhao; Barbara Anne Dosher; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Spontaneous recovery of effects of contrast adaptation without awareness.

Authors:  Gaoxing Mei; Xue Dong; Bo Dong; Min Bao
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-09-30

Review 3.  Adaptation in the visual cortex: a case for probing neuronal populations with natural stimuli.

Authors:  Michoel Snow; Ruben Coen-Cagli; Odelia Schwartz
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2017-07-27

4.  The Role of Bottom-Up and Top-Down Cortical Interactions in Adaptation to Natural Scene Statistics.

Authors:  Selam W Habtegiorgis; Christian Jarvers; Katharina Rifai; Heiko Neumann; Siegfried Wahl
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 3.492

5.  Dynamics of contrast adaptation in central and peripheral vision.

Authors:  Yi Gao; Michael A Webster; Fang Jiang
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Learning to see again: Perceptual learning of simulated abnormal on- off-cell population responses in sighted individuals.

Authors:  Rebecca B Esquenazi; Kimberly Meier; Michael Beyeler; Geoffrey M Boynton; Ione Fine
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Functional reallocation of sensory processing resources caused by long-term neural adaptation to altered optics.

Authors:  Antoine Barbot; Woon Ju Park; Cherlyn J Ng; Ru-Yuan Zhang; Krystel R Huxlin; Duje Tadin; Geunyoung Yoon
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 8.140

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.