Literature DB >> 23978234

On the transfer of prior tests or study events to subsequent study.

Benjamin C Storm1, Michael C Friedman1, Kou Murayama1, Robert A Bjork1.   

Abstract

Tests, as learning events, are often more effective than are additional study opportunities, especially when recall is tested after a long retention interval. To what degree, though, do prior test or study events support subsequent study activities? We set out to test an implication of Bjork and Bjork's (1992) new theory of disuse-that, under some circumstances, prior study may facilitate subsequent study more than does prior testing. Participants learned English-Swahili translations and then underwent a practice phase during which some items were tested (without feedback) and other items were restudied. Although tested items were better recalled after a 1-week delay than were restudied items, this benefit did not persist after participants had the opportunity to study the items again via feedback. In fact, after this additional study opportunity, items that had been restudied earlier were better recalled than were items that had been tested earlier. These results suggest that measuring the memorial consequences of testing requires more than a single test of retention and, theoretically, a consideration of the differing status of initially recallable and nonrecallable items.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23978234     DOI: 10.1037/a0034252

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  9 in total

1.  Reversing the testing effect by feedback: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.

Authors:  Bernhard Pastötter; Karl-Heinz T Bäuml
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 2.  A dual memory theory of the testing effect.

Authors:  Timothy C Rickard; Steven C Pan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-06

3.  Metacognitive control in self-regulated learning: Conditions affecting the choice of restudying versus retrieval practice.

Authors:  Thomas C Toppino; Melissa H LaVan; Ryan T Iaconelli
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-10

4.  Metacognitive control over the distribution of retrieval practice with and without feedback and the efficacy of learners' spacing choices.

Authors:  Thomas C Toppino; Matthew J Pagano
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-10-01

5.  Retrieval practice and spacing effects in young and older adults: An examination of the benefits of desirable difficulty.

Authors:  Geoffrey B Maddox; David A Balota
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-07

6.  Retrieval-induced versus context-induced forgetting: Does retrieval-induced forgetting depend on context shifts?

Authors:  Julia S Soares; Cody W Polack; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Desirable Difficulties in Vocabulary Learning.

Authors:  Robert A Bjork; Judith F Kroll
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  2015

8.  Participation in Voluntary Re-quizzing Is Predictive of Increased Performance on Cumulative Assessments in Introductory Biology.

Authors:  Elise M Walck-Shannon; Michael J Cahill; Mark A McDaniel; Regina F Frey
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Reversing the testing effect by feedback is a matter of performance criterion at practice.

Authors:  Mihály Racsmány; Ágnes Szőllősi; Miklós Marián
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-10
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.