Literature DB >> 23978151

Inactivation of the ventral lateral geniculate and nucleus of the optic tract impairs retention of visual eyeblink conditioning.

Adam B Steinmetz1, Eric W Buss, John H Freeman.   

Abstract

Reversible inactivation was used to examine the conditioned stimulus (CS) pathway for visual eyeblink conditioning (EBC). Previous research has shown that the ventral lateral geniculate (LGNv) and nucleus of the optic tract (NOT) could play a role in visual EBC through ipsilateral projections to the medial pontine nuclei. Rats were given visual EBC followed by inactivation of the ventral lateral geniculate (LGNv), nucleus of the optic tract (NOT), or both nuclei contralateral to the conditioned eye. Muscimol infusions into the NOT or LGNv impaired retention. Combined inactivation of LGNv/NOT produced the most severe impairment. Rats given inactivation of these visual nuclei after training with a vibration CS showed no impairment. The findings indicate that a parallel pathway of visual CS information projects from the LGNv and NOT to the medial pontine nuclei. 2013 APA, all rights reserved

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23978151      PMCID: PMC3967585          DOI: 10.1037/a0033729

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 0735-7044            Impact factor:   1.912


  16 in total

1.  Role of cortex in Pavlovian discrimination learning.

Authors:  D A Oakley; I S Russell
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1975-09

2.  Medial auditory thalamic stimulation as a conditioned stimulus for eyeblink conditioning in rats.

Authors:  Matthew M Campolattaro; Hunter E Halverson; John H Freeman
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2007-03-08       Impact factor: 2.460

3.  Subcortical storage of Pavlovian conditioning in the rabbit.

Authors:  D A Oakley; I S Russell
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1977-05

4.  Parallel pathways can conduct visual CS information during classical conditioning of the NM response.

Authors:  O Koutalidis; A Foster; D J Weisz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Medial auditory thalamic nuclei are necessary for eyeblink conditioning.

Authors:  Hunter E Halverson; John H Freeman
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.912

6.  Visual projections to the pontine nuclei in the rabbit: orthograde and retrograde tracing studies with WGA-HRP.

Authors:  G R Wells; M J Hardiman; C H Yeo
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1989-01-22       Impact factor: 3.215

7.  Initial localization of the acoustic conditioned stimulus projection system to the cerebellum essential for classical eyelid conditioning.

Authors:  J E Steinmetz; C G Logan; D J Rosen; J K Thompson; D G Lavond; R F Thompson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Neural circuitry and plasticity mechanisms underlying delay eyeblink conditioning.

Authors:  John H Freeman; Adam B Steinmetz
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 2.460

9.  Neuronal correlates of conditioned inhibition of the eyeblink response in the anterior interpositus nucleus.

Authors:  Daniel A Nicholson; John H Freeman
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.912

10.  Inferior colliculus lesions impair eyeblink conditioning in rats.

Authors:  John H Freeman; Hunter E Halverson; Erin M Hubbard
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2007-12-17       Impact factor: 2.460

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  The impact of hippocampal lesions on trace-eyeblink conditioning and forebrain-cerebellar interactions.

Authors:  Craig Weiss; John F Disterhoft
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.912

2.  Learning-related neuronal activity in the ventral lateral geniculate nucleus during associative cerebellar learning.

Authors:  Alireza Kashef; Matthew M Campolattaro; John H Freeman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Amygdala central nucleus modulation of cerebellar learning with a visual conditioned stimulus.

Authors:  Sean J Farley; Heba Albazboz; Benjamin J De Corte; Jason J Radley; John H Freeman
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2018-03-10       Impact factor: 2.877

Review 4.  Cerebellar learning mechanisms.

Authors:  John H Freeman
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2014-10-05       Impact factor: 3.252

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.