Literature DB >> 23977417

Minimally invasive treatment of cholecysto-choledocal lithiasis: The point of view of the surgical endoscopist.

Giovanni D De Palma1.   

Abstract

The rate of choledocholithiasis in patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis is estimated to be approximately 10%-33%, depending on the patient's age. Development of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography and Laparoscopic Surgery and improvement of diagnostic procedures have influenced new approaches to the management of common bile duct stones in association with gallstones. At present available minimally-invasive treatments of cholecysto-choledocal lithiasis include: single-stage laparoscopic treatment, perioperative endoscopic treatment and endoscopic treatment alone. Published data evidence that, associated endoscopic-laparoscopic approach necessitates increased number of procedures per patient while single-stage laparoscopic treatment is associated with a shorter hospital stay. However, current data does not suggest clear superiority of any one approach with regard to success, mortality, morbidity and cost-effectiveness. Considering the variety of therapeutic options available for management, a critical appraisal and decision-making is required. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography/EST should be adopted on a selective basis, i.e., in patients with acute obstructive suppurative cholangitis, severe biliary pancreatitis, ampullary stone impaction or severe comorbidity. In a setting where all facilities are available, decision in the selection of the therapeutic option depends on the patients, the number and size of choledocholithiasis stones, the anatomy of the cystic duct and common bile duct, the surgical history of patients and local expertise.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cholecysto-choledocal lithiasis; Endoscopic treatment; Laparoscopic treatment; Management strategies; Minimally invasive therapy

Year:  2013        PMID: 23977417      PMCID: PMC3750126          DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v5.i6.161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg


  62 in total

1.  Stenting or surgery for treatment of irretrievable common bile duct calculi in elderly patients?

Authors:  G D De Palma; C Catanzano
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 2.  Early endoscopic management of acute gallstone pancreatitis--an evidence-based review.

Authors:  A N Barkun
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  SAGES guidelines for the clinical application of laparoscopic biliary tract surgery.

Authors:  D Wayne Overby; Keith N Apelgren; William Richardson; Robert Fanelli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Comparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy and laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct for cholecystocholedocholithiasis.

Authors:  D-F Hong; Y Xin; D-W Chen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Endoscopic ultrasound: a meta-analysis of test performance in suspected biliary obstruction.

Authors:  Donald Garrow; Scott Miller; Debajyoti Sinha; Jason Conway; Brenda J Hoffman; Robert H Hawes; Joseph Romagnuolo
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 11.382

6.  The role of endoscopy in the evaluation of suspected choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  John T Maple; Tamir Ben-Menachem; Michelle A Anderson; Vasundhara Appalaneni; Subhas Banerjee; Brooks D Cash; Laurel Fisher; M Edwyn Harrison; Robert D Fanelli; Norio Fukami; Steven O Ikenberry; Rajeev Jain; Khalid Khan; Mary Lee Krinsky; Laura Strohmeyer; Jason A Dominitz
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.

Authors:  Renam Tinoco; Augusto Tinoco; Luciana El-Kadre; Leandro Peres; Daniela Sueth
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Randomised trial of laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct versus postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for common bile duct stones.

Authors:  M Rhodes; L Sussman; L Cohen; M P Lewis
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-01-17       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Trend towards primary closure following laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct.

Authors:  M Jameel; B Darmas; A L Baker
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.891

10.  MRCP compared to diagnostic ERCP for diagnosis when biliary obstruction is suspected: a systematic review.

Authors:  Eva C Kaltenthaler; Stephen J Walters; Jim Chilcott; Anthony Blakeborough; Yolanda Bravo Vergel; Steven Thomas
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2006-08-14       Impact factor: 1.930

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Modern approach to cholecysto-choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Lapo Bencini; Cinzia Tommasi; Roberto Manetti; Marco Farsi
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-02-16

Review 2.  Destiny for Rendezvous: Is Cholecysto/Choledocholithiasis Better Treated with Dual- or Single-Step Procedures?

Authors:  S Vaccari; M Minghetti; A Lauro; M I Bellini; A Ussia; S Khouzam; I R Marino; M Cervellera; V D'Andrea; V Tonini
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 3.  Diagnosis and management of choledocholithiasis in the golden age of imaging, endoscopy and laparoscopy.

Authors:  Renato Costi; Alessandro Gnocchi; Francesco Di Mario; Leopoldo Sarli
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 5.742

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.