| Literature DB >> 23977389 |
Yan V Sun1, Alicia Lazarus, Jennifer A Smith, Yu-Hsuan Chuang, Wei Zhao, Stephen T Turner, Sharon L R Kardia.
Abstract
A more thorough understanding of the differences in DNA methylation (DNAm) profiles in populations may hold promise for identifying molecular mechanisms through which genetic and environmental factors jointly contribute to human diseases. Inflammation is a key molecular mechanism underlying several chronic diseases including cardiovascular disease, and it affects DNAm profile on both global and locus-specific levels. To understand the impact of inflammation on the DNAm of the human genome, we investigated DNAm profiles of peripheral blood leukocytes from 966 African American participants in the Genetic Epidemiology Network of Arteriopathy (GENOA) study. By testing the association of DNAm sites on CpG islands of over 14,000 genes with C-reactive protein (CRP), an inflammatory biomarker of cardiovascular disease, we identified 257 DNAm sites in 240 genes significantly associated with serum levels of CRP adjusted for age, sex, body mass index and smoking status, and corrected for multiple testing. Of the significantly associated DNAm sites, 80.5% were hypomethylated with higher CRP levels. The most significant Gene Ontology terms enriched in the genes associated with the CRP levels were immune system process, immune response, defense response, response to stimulus, and response to stress, which are all linked to the functions of leukocytes. While the CRP-associated DNAm may be cell-type specific, understanding the DNAm association with CRP in peripheral blood leukocytes of multi-ethnic populations can assist in unveiling the molecular mechanism of how the process of inflammation affects the risks of developing common disease through epigenetic modifications.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23977389 PMCID: PMC3747126 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073480
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Summary of demographic variables.
| Females (N=685, 70.9%) | Males (N=281, 29.1%) | |
|---|---|---|
| Mean±SD | Mean±SD | |
| Age (yr.) | 66.10±7.56 | 66.70±7.64 |
| BMI* (kg/m2) | 32.06±6.58 | 28.98±4.81 |
| SBP (mm Hg) | 140.88±21.62 | 138.05±20.75 |
| DBP* (mm Hg) | 77.52±10.83 | 80.39±11.06 |
| CRP* (mg/L), median (Q1, Q3) | 0.38 (0.19, 0.80) | 0.27 (0.12, 0.58) |
* statistically different between males and females (p-value < 0.05).
Summary of the 30 most significant CRP-associated DNA methylation sites.
| DNAm | Gene | Chr. | Location* (bp) | Strand | Beta (SE) | P-value | P-value2** | ds1 P-value | ds2 P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cg07073964 | KLK10 | 19 | 649371 | - | -4.12 (0.58) | 5.85×10-12 | 4.43×10-12 | 3.51×10-3 | 1.81×10-6 |
| cg09358725 | LMO2 | 11 | 33870664 | - | -3.60 (0.52) | 1.69×10-11 | 2.21×10-11 | 1.83×10-4 | 1.80×10-5 |
| cg04121771 | TM4SF4 | 3 | 150674314 | + | -4.42 (0.68) | 2.05×10-10 | 6.88×10-11 | 2.25×10-4 | 1.46×10-4 |
| cg08458487 | SFTPD | 10 | 81699171 | - | -2.79 (0.43) | 2.26×10-10 | 3.07×10-10 | 4.09×10-4 | 3.48×10-5 |
| cg09305224 | FUT7 | 9 | 139047066 | - | -3.38 (0.52) | 2.48×10-10 | 2.76×10-10 | 6.95×10-4 | 3.82×10-5 |
| cg00645579 | IRF7 | 11 | 607140 | - | -3.80 (0.59) | 2.94×10-10 | 2.85×10-10 | 8.55×10-4 | 7.06×10-6 |
| cg05556717 | CCL26 | 7 | 75257240 | - | -3.32 (0.52) | 3.94×10-10 | 3.12×10-10 | 2.13×10-4 | 8.39×10-7 |
| cg17496921 | TSPAN16 | 19 | 11267993 | + | -2.94 (0.46) | 4.97×10-10 | 4.78×10-10 | 5.68×10-4 | 1.12×10-4 |
| cg03801286 | KCNE1 | 21 | 34806378 | - | -2.62 (0.41) | 5.61×10-10 | 5.74×10-10 | 2.52×10-4 | 2.34×10-4 |
| cg21969640 | GPR84 | 12 | 53043844 | - | -3.08 (0.49) | 6.03×10-10 | 6.28×10-10 | 2.69×10-4 | 4.88×10-5 |
| cg05501357 | HIPK3 | 11 | 33264845 | + | -3.35 (0.53) | 6.29×10-10 | 7.41×10-10 | 8.58×10-4 | 1.83×10-4 |
| cg03600318 | SFTPD | 10 | 81698971 | - | -3.58 (0.57) | 7.01×10-10 | 6.80×10-10 | 1.65×10-4 | 1.99×10-3 |
| cg18084554 | ARID3A | 19 | 880046 | + | -2.68 (0.43) | 7.91×10-10 | 1.03×10-9 | 1.19×10-4 | 7.68×10-5 |
| cg06625767 | F12 | 5 | 176769301 | - | -2.80 (0.45) | 1.04×10-9 | 1.07×10-9 | 3.82×10-3 | 3.38×10-5 |
| cg15248035 | CCIN | 9 | 36159949 | + | -2.62 (0.42) | 1.22×10-9 | 1.36×10-9 | 7.39×10-4 | 1.79×10-4 |
| cg05546038 | NOL3 | 16 | 65764534 | + | -3.96 (0.64) | 1.40×10-9 | 1.58×10-9 | 2.21×10-5 | 2.23×10-3 |
| cg09303642 | NFE2 | 12 | 52977085 | - | -2.70 (0.44) | 1.60×10-9 | 2.28×10-9 | 1.94×10-4 | 1.01×10-4 |
| cg03330678 | SEPT9 | 17 | 72827828 | + | -2.62 (0.43) | 1.69×10-9 | 2.27×10-9 | 1.62×10-3 | 3.57×10-5 |
| cg17753124 | IER2 | 19 | 13120872 | + | -3.34 (0.54) | 1.72×10-9 | 1.31×10-9 | 1.59×10-3 | 3.50×10-4 |
| cg22242539 | SERPINF1 | 17 | 1611970 | + | -3.25 (0.53) | 2.08×10-9 | 1.86×10-9 | 2.31×10-4 | 8.51×10-4 |
| cg17166812 | NDUFS2 | 1 | 159436198 | + | -3.89 (0.64) | 2.28×10-9 | 2.30×10-9 | 4.44×10-3 | 1.82×10-4 |
| cg22266967 | S100P | 4 | 6746599 | + | -2.84 (0.47) | 2.29×10-9 | 2.39×10-9 | 2.58×10-3 | 6.12×10-5 |
| cg12380764 | IL19 | 1 | 205037818 | + | -2.93 (0.48) | 2.35×10-9 | 2.93×10-9 | 2.38×10-4 | 4.40×10-4 |
| cg10275770 | ICAM2 | 17 | 59437937 | - | -3.64 (0.60) | 2.51×10-9 | 2.21×10-9 | 5.35×10-4 | 1.06×10-3 |
| cg21492378 | CEP1 | 9 | 122890100 | + | -3.68 (0.60) | 2.53×10-9 | 2.08×10-9 | 1.29×10-4 | 9.80×10-6 |
| cg22381196 | DHODH | 16 | 70598877 | + | -2.24 (0.37) | 2.99×10-9 | 3.53×10-9 | 3.67×10-4 | 7.47×10-4 |
| cg23140706 | NFE2 | 12 | 52975545 | - | -4.22 (0.70) | 2.99×10-9 | 3.90×10-9 | 6.65×10-4 | 1.32×10-3 |
| cg20283107 | FAM91A1 | 8 | 124858150 | + | -3.65 (0.60) | 3.12×10-9 | 3.57×10-9 | 2.48×10-4 | 4.31×10-6 |
| cg27606341 | FYB | 5 | 39255389 | - | -2.55 (0.42) | 3.21×10-9 | 3.31×10-9 | 1.67×10-4 | 8.62×10-4 |
| cg26861460 | PARVG | 22 | 42906788 | + | -2.90 (0.48) | 3.27×10-9 | 3.42×10-9 | 3.68×10-4 | 1.29×10-4 |
* Chromosomal location is based on NCBI build 36.1.
** P-value2 was from the sensitivity analysis adjusted for age, gender, BMI, current smoking and hypertension status.
An internal replication was conducted by randomly splitting 966 samples into two mutually exclusive subsets (see details in the Methods), ds1 and ds2, each with 393 unrelated individuals. The beta coefficients and p-values were calculated using linear regression models for each subset.
Figure 1Quantile-quantile plot of DNAm association with logCRP.
Figure 2Manhattan plot of methylome-wide association with log CRP in 966 African Americans, adjusted for age, gender, BMI and cigarette smoking.
Over-represented GO terms for genes with CRP-associated DNAm sites.
| GO Term ID | GO term name | GO Domain* | Number of Genes | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GO:0002376 | immune system process | BP | 61 | 1.09×10-12 |
| GO:0050896 | response to stimulus | BP | 126 | 1.84×10-9 |
| GO:0006950 | response to stress | BP | 68 | 6.28×10-7 |
| GO:0006952 | defense response | BP | 39 | 2.74×10-6 |
| GO:0006955 | immune response | BP | 46 | 1.16×10-10 |
* BP: Biological Process
Figure 3Quantile-quantile plot of DNAm association with lnCRP adjusted for top three principal components of the DNAm data.