| Literature DB >> 23977263 |
Robert Trivers1, Brian G Palestis, John T Manning.
Abstract
Jamaican athletes are prominent in sprint running but the reasons for their success are not clear. Here we consider the possibility that symmetry, particularly symmetry of the legs, in Jamaican children is linked to high sprinting speed in adults. Our study population was a cohort of 288 rural children, mean age 8.2 (± 1 SD = 1.7) years in 1996. Symmetry was measured in 1996 and 2006 from the fluctuating asymmetry (FA) of three lower-body traits and we constructed a lower body composite FA trait (Comp lb-FA). In 2010 we measured sprinting speed (for 90 m and 180 m races) in participants recruited from our original cohort. There were 163 untrained adults in our sample. We found: (i) high Comp lb and knee symmetry in 1996 and 2006 were linked to fast sprinting times in our 2010 runners and (ii) our sample of sprinters appears to have self-selected for greater symmetry. We conclude that high knee symmetry in childhood is linked to an ability to sprint fast in adult Jamaicans as well as a readiness to sprint.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23977263 PMCID: PMC3747165 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072244
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Relationships (standardized regression coefficients, b) between relative FA independent of BMI and sprinting speed in 2010 for both 90 m and 180 m sprints.
| 90 m | 180 m | ||||||
| Year | Trait | b | r2 | p | b | r2 | p |
|
| Res Complb-FA | 0.14 | 0.02 | 0.09 | 0.18 | 0.03 | 0.03* |
| Res FA knee | 0.21 | 0.04 | 0.01* | 0.19 | 0.03 | 0.03* | |
| Res FA ankle | −0.09 | 0.26 | −0.002 | 0.98 | |||
| Res FA foot | 0.11 | 0.18 | 0.10 | 0.23 | |||
|
| Res Complb-FA | 0.17 | 0.03 | 0.05* | 0.17 | 0.03 | 0.04* |
| Res FA knee | 0.24 | 0.04 | 0.01* | 0.14 | 0.01 | 0.10 | |
| Res FA ankle | 0.01 | 0.90 | 0.07 | 0.41 | |||
| Res FA foot | 0.07 | 0.43 | 0.09 | 0.30 | |||
|
| Res Complb-FA | 0.21 | 0.04 | 0.02* | 0.21 | 0.04 | 0.02* |
| Res FA knee | 0.30 | 0.08 | 0.001* | 0.19 | 0.03 | 0.03* | |
| Res FA ankle | −0.04 | 0.67 | 0.05 | 0.61 | |||
| Res FA foot | 0.12 | 0.19 | 0.11 | 0.21 | |||
Sample sizes are as follows: 1996 FA (n = 148 for 90 m, 147 for 180 m); 2006 FA (n = 135 for both sprints); mean of 1996 and 2006 FA (n = 124 for both sprints).
Note. Res: Residual; Comp lb-FA: composite lower body fluctuating asymmetry; Statistical significance is indicated by asterisks; r2 values are adjusted for the presence of >1 variable when using multiple regression and apply to the overall model rather than any individual trait.
Mean 1996 composite lower body FA for volunteers (in bold) and non-volunteers for recruitments across years.
| Year | Meanlb-FA | N | SD | SE | t | ∼df | p |
|
|
| 270 | 0.0062 | 0.0004 | N/A | ||
|
|
| 139 | 0.0060 | 0.0005 | 0.61 | 263 | 0.54 |
| 0.0078 | 131 | 0.0065 | 0.0006 | ||||
|
|
| 173 | 0.0062 | 0.0005 | 1.26 | 197 | 0.21 |
| 0.0082 | 97 | 0.0063 | 0.0006 | ||||
|
|
| 187 | 0.0059 | 0.0004 | 2.14 | 138 | 0.034* |
| 0.0088 | 83 | 0.0068 | 0.0007 | ||||
|
|
| 151 | 0.0063 | 0.0005 | 1.69 | 257 | 0.092 |
| 0.0083 | 119 | 0.0061 | 0.0006 | ||||
|
|
| 168 | 0.0060 | 0.0005 | 1.33 | 197 | 0.19 |
| 0.0082 | 102 | 0.0066 | 0.0007 | ||||
|
|
| 158 | 0.0052 | 0.0004 | 2.78 | 187 | 0.006* |
| 0.0089 | 112 | 0.0073 | 0.0007 |
Note. We used the unequal variance t-test and df are approximated [16]. Statistical significance is indicated by asterisks.