Literature DB >> 23975081

Low-dose, prophylactic, extended-field, intensity-modulated radiotherapy plus concurrent weekly cisplatin for patients with stage IB2-IIIB cervical cancer, positive pelvic lymph nodes, and negative para-aortic lymph nodes.

Ji-An Liang1, Shang-Wen Chen, Yao-Ching Hung, Lian-Shung Yeh, Wei-Chun Chang, Wu-Chou Lin, Yin-Yi Chang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess prospectively the clinical outcomes of low-dose prophylactic extended-field, intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plus concurrent weekly cisplatin for patients with stage IB2-IIIB cervical cancer, positive pelvic lymph nodes (PLNs), and negative para-aortic lymph nodes (PALNs).
METHODS: Thirty-two patients with stage IB2-IIIB cervical cancer with positive PLN and negative PALN were included prospectively. All lymph nodes were assessed with positron emission tomography. The PALN field, including lymphatics from the superior border of L1 to the L4-L5 interphase, was irradiated concurrently with pelvic IMRT with a prescribed dose of 40 Gy in 25 fractions. Chemotherapy consisted of cisplatin delivered weekly at a dose of 40 mg/m. Using historical controls treated with pelvic radiotherapy, the survival curves were compared to assess the difference between the 2 treatment periods.
RESULTS: Thirty-one patients completed the allocated extended-field IMRT, and all finished the planned pelvic IMRT and brachytherapy. Acute ≥ grade 3 gastrointestinal, genitourinary, and hematologic toxicities were seen in 2, 1, and 18 patients, respectively. During a median follow-up of 33 months, 5 patients developed out-field distant recurrences. One patient had a late grade 3 gastrointestinal complication, and 1 patient had genitourinary toxicity. The 3-year actuarial overall survival, disease-free survival, and distant metastasis-free survival for the study cohort and historic controls were 87% versus 62% (P = 0.02), 82% versus 54% (P = 0.02), and 79% versus 57% (P = 0.01), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Extended-field IMRT of 40 Gy to the PALN plus concurrent cisplatin can effectively eradicate subclinical disease at the PALN and improve the outcome for patients with PLN-positive stage IB2-IIIB cervical cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 23975081     DOI: 10.1097/IGC.0b013e31829f4dc5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  17 in total

Review 1.  The role of para-aortic nodal irradiation in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Adela Poitevin Chacón; Jessica Chavez-Nogueda; Rubí Ramos-Prudencio; Michelle Aline Villavicencio-Queijeiro; Francisco Lozano-Ruiz
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2018-10-09

2.  Impact of primary para-aortic lymphadenectomy on distant failure in locally advanced cervical cancer patients treated in the era of image-guided adaptive brachytherapy.

Authors:  Cyrus Chargari; Renaud Mazeron; Ariane Dunant; Sébastien Gouy; Claire Petit; Pierre Maroun; Catherine Uzan; Pierre Annede; Enrica Bentivegna; Corinne Balleyguier; Catherine Genestie; Patricia Pautier; Alexandra Leary; Catherine Lhomme; Eric Deutsch; Philippe Morice; Christine Haie-Meder
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 5.150

3.  Lymph flow guided irradiation of regional lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer: Preliminary analysis of scintigraphic data.

Authors:  Sergey Nikolaevich Novikov; Pavel Ivanovich Krzhivitskii; Sergey Vasilevich Kanaev; Igor Viktorovitch Berlev; Margarita Viktorovna Kargopolova; Zaur Ibragimov; Mikhail Bisyarin; Valentina Vladimirovna Saveleva
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2018-06-12

4.  Safety and efficacy of semiextended field intensity-modulated radiation therapy and concurrent cisplatin in locally advanced cervical cancer patients: An observational study of 10-year experience.

Authors:  Jie Lee; Jhen-Bin Lin; Fang-Ju Sun; Yu-Jen Chen; Chih-Long Chang; Ya-Ting Jan; Meng-Hao Wu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  Practice guidelines for management of cervical cancer in Korea: a Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology Consensus Statement.

Authors:  Myong Cheol Lim; Maria Lee; Seung Hyuk Shim; Eun Ji Nam; Jung Yun Lee; Hyun Jung Kim; Yoo Young Lee; Kwang Beom Lee; Jeong Yeol Park; Yun Hwan Kim; Kyung Do Ki; Yong Jung Song; Hyun Hoon Chung; Sunghoon Kim; Jeong Won Lee; Jae Weon Kim; Duk Soo Bae; Jong Min Lee
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 4.401

6.  Mapping patterns of para-aortic lymph node recurrence in cervical cancer: a retrospective cohort analysis.

Authors:  Bong Kyung Bae; Shin-Hyung Park; Shin Young Jeong; Gun Oh Chong; Mi Young Kim; Jae-Chul Kim
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 3.481

7.  Extended-field radiotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer.

Authors:  Komsan Thamronganantasakul; Narudom Supakalin; Chumnan Kietpeerakool; Porjai Pattanittum; Pisake Lumbiganon
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-10-26

8.  Optimal Extent of Prophylactic Irradiation of Paraaortic Lymph Nodes in Patients with Uterine Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Jinhyun Choi; Hong In Yoon; Jeongshim Lee; Ki Chang Keum; Gwi Eon Kim; Yong Bae Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Patterns of failure after use of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in integration of extended-field chemo-IMRT and 3D-brachytherapy plannings for advanced cervical cancers with extensive lymph node metastases.

Authors:  Yih-Lin Chung; Cheng-Fang Horng; Pei-Ing Lee; Fong-Lin Chen
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Chemoradiotherapy in combination with radical surgery is associated with better outcome in cervical cancer patients.

Authors:  Dan Zheng; Hua-Ping Mou; Peng Diao; Xiao-Ming Li; Chuan-Li Zhang; Jing Jiang; Jia-Lian Chen; Li-Shuai Wang; Qiu Wang; Guang-Yuan Zhou; Jie Chen; Chuan Lin; Zhi-Ping Yuan
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-12-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.