Literature DB >> 23974829

Lack of referral for genetic counseling and testing in BRCA1/2 and Lynch syndromes: a nationwide study based on 240,134 consultations and 134,652 genetic tests.

P Pujol1, D Stoppa Lyonnet, T Frebourg, J Blin, M C Picot, C Lasset, C Dugast, P Berthet, B Bressac de Paillerets, H Sobol, S Grandjouan, F Soubrier, B Buecher, R Guimbaud, R Lidereau, P Jonveaux, C Houdayer, S Giraud, S Olschwang, E Nogue, V Galibert, C Bara, F Nowak, D Khayat, C Nogues.   

Abstract

Based on nationwide data from the French national cancer institute (INCa), we analyzed the evolution of cancer genetics consultations and testing over time, and the uptake of targeted tests in relatives of families with BRCA1/2 or MMR genes mutation. Genetic testing and consultations for familial high-risk individuals are exclusively funded and monitored by the INCa in France. All nationwide cancer genetics centers reported annually standardized parameters of activity from 2003 to 2011. The analysis included a total of 240,134 consultations and 134,652 genetic tests enabling to identify 32,494 mutation carriers. Referral for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) or colorectal cancer predisposition syndromes represented 59 % (141,639) and 23.2 % (55,698) consultations, respectively. From 2003 to 2011, we found a dramatic and steady increase of tests performed for BRCA1/2 (from 2,095 to 7,393 tests/year, P < 0.0001) but not for MMR genes (from 1,144 to 1,635/year, P = NS). The overall percentage of deleterious mutations identified in the probands tested was 13.8 and 20.9 % in HBOC and Lynch syndromes, respectively. Pooled analysis for BRCA1/2 and Lynch syndrome tests showed an inverse relationship between the percentage of mutation detected and the absolute number of tests performed over the time (overall Cochran-Armitage test for trend: P < 0.001). In families with BRCA1/2 or MMR identified mutations, there was an average number of 2.94 and 3.28 relatives performing targeted tests, respectively. This nationwide study shows a lack of referral and genetic testing in Lynch as compared to HBOC syndromes. Only a third of relatives of a proband with a predisposing mutation performed a targeted test. Enhanced information about benefit of genetic testing should be given to clinicians and patients for Lynch syndrome and relatives of a proband carrying an identified predisposing mutation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23974829     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-013-2669-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  23 in total

1.  Genetic Test Results and Disclosure to Family Members: Qualitative Interviews of Healthcare Professionals' Perceptions of Ethical and Professional Issues in France.

Authors:  Diane D' Audiffret Van Haecke; Sandrine de Montgolfier
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Supporting disclosure of genetic information to family members: professional practice and timelines in cancer genetics.

Authors:  Benjamin Derbez; Antoine de Pauw; Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet; Sandrine de Montgolfier
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  Developing a framework for implementation of genetic services: learning from examples of testing for monogenic forms of common diseases.

Authors:  Tessel Rigter; Lidewij Henneman; Jacqueline E W Broerse; Maggie Shepherd; Ignacio Blanco; Ulf Kristoffersson; Martina C Cornel
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2014-06-04

4.  Germline Genetic Features of Young Individuals With Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Elena M Stoffel; Erika Koeppe; Jessica Everett; Peter Ulintz; Mark Kiel; Jenae Osborne; Linford Williams; Kristen Hanson; Stephen B Gruber; Laura S Rozek
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Medical Oncologists' Experiences in Using Genomic Testing for Lung and Colorectal Cancer Care.

Authors:  Stacy W Gray; Benjamin Kim; Lynette Sholl; Angel Cronin; Aparna R Parikh; Carrie N Klabunde; Katherine L Kahn; David A Haggstrom; Nancy L Keating
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 3.840

6.  Consequences of universal MSI/IHC in screening ENDOMETRIAL cancer patients for Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Brittany A L Batte; Amanda S Bruegl; Molly S Daniels; Kari L Ring; Katherine M Dempsey; Bojana Djordjevic; Rajyalakshmi Luthra; Bryan M Fellman; Karen H Lu; Russell R Broaddus
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  The effect of referral for genetic counseling on genetic testing and surgical prevention in women at high risk for ovarian cancer: Results from a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Charles W Drescher; J David Beatty; Robert Resta; M Robyn Andersen; Kate Watabayashi; Jason Thorpe; Sarah Hawley; Hannah Purkey; Jessica Chubak; Nancy Hanson; Diana S M Buist; Nicole Urban
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  A clinical and genetic analysis of multiple primary cancer referrals to genetics services.

Authors:  James Whitworth; Jon Hoffman; Cyril Chapman; Kai Ren Ong; Fiona Lalloo; D Gareth Evans; Eamonn R Maher
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 4.246

9.  Population-based screening for breast and ovarian cancer risk due to BRCA1 and BRCA2.

Authors:  Efrat Gabai-Kapara; Amnon Lahad; Bella Kaufman; Eitan Friedman; Shlomo Segev; Paul Renbaum; Rachel Beeri; Moran Gal; Julia Grinshpun-Cohen; Karen Djemal; Jessica B Mandell; Ming K Lee; Uziel Beller; Raphael Catane; Mary-Claire King; Ephrat Levy-Lahad
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Knowledge, attitudes and referral patterns of lynch syndrome: a survey of clinicians in australia.

Authors:  Yen Y Tan; Amanda B Spurdle; Andreas Obermair
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2014-05-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.