| Literature DB >> 23974529 |
Moshe David-Pur1, Lilach Bareket-Keren, Giora Beit-Yaakov, Dorit Raz-Prag, Yael Hanein.
Abstract
Neuro-prosthetic devices aim to restore impaired function through artificial stimulation of the nervous system. A lingering technological bottleneck in this field is the realization of soft, micron sized electrodes capable of injecting enough charge to evoke localized neuronal activity without causing neither electrode nor tissue damage. Direct stimulation with micro electrodes will offer the high efficacy needed in applications such as cochlear and retinal implants. Here we present a new flexible neuronal micro electrode device, based entirely on carbon nanotube technology, where both the conducting traces and the stimulating electrodes consist of conducting carbon nanotube films embedded in a polymeric support. The use of carbon nanotubes bestows the electrodes flexibility and excellent electrochemical properties. As opposed to contemporary flexible neuronal electrodes, the technology presented here is both robust and the resulting stimulating electrodes are nearly purely capacitive. Recording and stimulation tests with chick retinas were used to validate the advantageous properties of the electrodes and demonstrate their suitability for high-efficacy neuronal stimulation applications.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 23974529 PMCID: PMC3921458 DOI: 10.1007/s10544-013-9804-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Microdevices ISSN: 1387-2176 Impact factor: 2.838
Fig. 1All-CNT flexible multi-electrode arrays. a Electrode fabrication scheme. (1) The process is based on a single photolithographically defined Ni catalyst layer. (2) The CNT film is then grown using a CVD process. (3) Next, the film is transferred to a polymeric support (e.g. medical adhesive tape, PDMS, Parylene C, polyimide). (4) Finally, a second polymeric layer (PDMS) with predefined holes is bonded with the CNT carrying film for passivation. b Different patterns of flexible CNT electrode arrays on different support layers: (1) PDMS, (2) medical adhesive tape, (3) Parylene C and (4) polyimide
Fig. 2Electrochemical and transport properties of CNT devices. a An ESEM image of MWCNTs on a medical adhesive tape; Inset: a zoom out ESEM cross section image of a MWCNT film on a medical adhesive tape (marked with arrow) (1), Parylene C (2), and PDMS (3), scale bar: 2 μm; Inset scale bar: 100 μm. b CV scans of a CNT electrode (100 μm in diameter) at different scan rates with blue, red and black lines corresponding to scan rates of 15, 50 and 150 mV/s respectively. c Charging current versus scan rate of a CNT electrode (100 μm in diameter), solid line is a linear fit. d CNT electrode capacitance versus electrode surface area, solid line is a linear fit. Inset: Microscope image of CNT electrodes (100, 150, 200 and 250 μm in diameter). Measurements shown are for a single representative set of devices. e CNT electrode (100 μm in diameter) impedance versus frequency. All electrochemical measurements were performed in PBS with an Ag/AgCl reference electrode. f Raman spectrum of a MWCNT film. g CNT film electrical resistance versus number of squares. Inset: Microscope image of different length TiN-CNTs-TiN bars used to derive film electrical resistance. Measurements shown are for a single representative set of devices
Fig. 3Flexible CNT MEA for extracellular neuronal recording and stimulation. a The flexible CNT electrode array mounted on a PCB support linking the electrodes to external amplifiers (scale bar: 5 mm). The array consists of 16 electrodes and a top passivation layer with 50 μm-diameter holes which define the electrode effective size. An embryonic chick retina (day 14) was flattened on the electrode array. The edge of the retina is marked with a dashed line. Inset: enlargement of the electrodes area (area marked with a solid line; scale bar: 200 μm). b A circuit model for extracellular recording and stimulation from a neural tissue using the flexible electrode array. The model demonstrates the electrochemical interface resistance and capacitance of the CNT electrode and the solution derived shunt capacitance as well as the point of stimulation
Fig. 4Electrical recording and stimulation of chick retina with flexible CNT MEA. a Evoked activity using a biphasic cathodic first pulse (arrowhead). The large signal at t=0 is an artifact of the stimulation. b Firing rate of evoked activity at different stimulation intensities (3–10 nC). c Firing rate of evoked activity after synaptic blockers CNQX and APV application (stimulation was applied every 10 s). After 400 s no retinal ganglion cells activation is observed
Neuronal recording and stimulation multi-electrode technologies
| Reference | Electrode description |
| Area (μm2) | Specific DC capacitance (mFcm−2) | Stimulation threshold | SNR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rigid CNT MEAs | Wang et al. ( | Vertically aligned MWCNT (CVD) MEA on a quartz substrate with PEGPL coating | Embryonic rat hippocampal cells | 2,500–10,000 | 1.6 | 10 nC | NA |
| Gabay et al. ( | MWCNT (CVD) MEA on a Si substrate | Rat cortical cultures | 5,024 | 10 | NA | 135 | |
| Commercial TiN MEA; not coated with CNT | Rat cortical cultures | 706 | 2.5 | NA | 4b | ||
| Keefer et al. ( | ITO MEA coated with MWCNT-Au (electrochemical deposition) | Mice frontal cortex cultures | 314 | 3.24 | 195 mV | Recording | |
| Gabriel et al. ( | Pt MEA coated with SWCNT (drop coating) on a Pyrex substrate | Isolated rabbit retinas | 1,256 | 0.000045 | NA | 21b | |
| Su et al. ( | Cone-shaped Si MEA coated with MWCNT (CVD) after O2 plasma | Crayfish giant neurons | 10–2,000 | 2.5 | NA | 42.3 | |
| Fuchsberger et al. ( | TiN MEA coated with MWCNT (micro-contact printing). | Rat postnatal hippocampal cultures | 5,024 | 2.5a | NA | Recording | |
| Flexible CNT MEAs | Lin et al. ( | Vertically aligned CNT electrodes embedded in Parylene C film | Crayfish nerve cord | 1,962 | Not available | NA | 257 |
| Hsu et al. ( | CNT MEA (CVD) on polyimide after UV-ozone modification | Crayfish giant neurons | 3,600–40,000 | 0.1 | NA | 150 | |
| Chen et al. ( | CNT MEA (CVD) on polyimide after UV-ozone modification | Crayfish caudal photoreceptor | 7,850–125,600 | 0.21 | NA | 6.2 | |
|
| NA | 8.68 | |||||
|
| CNTs on a medical tape | Embryonic chick retina | 1,962–125,664 | 2 | 4 nC | 20 | |
| Other flexible MEAs | Blau et al. ( | PEDOT:PSS+5 % ethylene glycol (v/v) electrodes on PDMS | Embryonic rat and mice hearts | 11,304 | Not available | NA | 100 |
| Rat cortico-hippocampl cultures | 5 | ||||||
| Chen et al. ( | Au MEA on Parylene C reinforced with SU8 and PEG filled micro channels | Crayfish lateral giant nerve | 2,500 | Not available | NA | 32 |
NA-stimulation/recording were not applied using the MEA
aCalculated from EIS at 1 Hz
bCalculated from data in the article