BACKGROUND: The efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) differs in patients with lung adenocarcinoma harboring EGFR-activating mutations. Although lung adenocarcinoma with EGFR-activating mutations has heterogeneous morphologic features, the predictive role of histologic subtype of lung adenocarcinoma with regard to the effectiveness of EGFR-TKIs in patients with EGFR-activating mutations has not been well defined. METHODS: Among 134 postoperative recurrence patients with lung adenocarcinoma harboring EGFR-activating mutation (L858R or exon 19 deletion) treated with EGFR-TKIs, we retrospectively analyzed 61 patients treated with EGFR-TKIs as first-line chemotherapy. All the tumors were classified according to the new histologic classification proposed by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC), American Thoracic Society (ATS), and European Respiratory Society (ERS) into the following subtypes: lepidic, papillary, acinar, micropapillary, or solid predominant subtype. We evaluated the correlation between the histologic subtype and the clinical efficacy of EGFR-TKIs. RESULTS: In overall response rate, adenocarcinoma with solid predominant subtype is significantly worse than with non-solid predominant subtype (61 vs. 88 %, P = 0.03). The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival after EGFR-TKI treatment were significantly shorter for the patients with solid predominant subtype than for those with non-solid predominant subtype (median PFS of 7.7 vs. 13.5 months, P = 0.002, and median OS of 21.5 vs. 31.0 months, P = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS: This study indicated that among patients with lung adenocarcinoma harboring activating EGFR mutations treated with EGFR-TKIs, solid predominant subtype according to IASLC/ATS/ERS classification is a response predictor for EGFR-TKI.
BACKGROUND: The efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) differs in patients with lung adenocarcinoma harboring EGFR-activating mutations. Although lung adenocarcinoma with EGFR-activating mutations has heterogeneous morphologic features, the predictive role of histologic subtype of lung adenocarcinoma with regard to the effectiveness of EGFR-TKIs in patients with EGFR-activating mutations has not been well defined. METHODS: Among 134 postoperative recurrence patients with lung adenocarcinoma harboring EGFR-activating mutation (L858R or exon 19 deletion) treated with EGFR-TKIs, we retrospectively analyzed 61 patients treated with EGFR-TKIs as first-line chemotherapy. All the tumors were classified according to the new histologic classification proposed by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC), American Thoracic Society (ATS), and European Respiratory Society (ERS) into the following subtypes: lepidic, papillary, acinar, micropapillary, or solid predominant subtype. We evaluated the correlation between the histologic subtype and the clinical efficacy of EGFR-TKIs. RESULTS: In overall response rate, adenocarcinoma with solid predominant subtype is significantly worse than with non-solid predominant subtype (61 vs. 88 %, P = 0.03). The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival after EGFR-TKI treatment were significantly shorter for the patients with solid predominant subtype than for those with non-solid predominant subtype (median PFS of 7.7 vs. 13.5 months, P = 0.002, and median OS of 21.5 vs. 31.0 months, P = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS: This study indicated that among patients with lung adenocarcinoma harboring activating EGFR mutations treated with EGFR-TKIs, solid predominant subtype according to IASLC/ATS/ERS classification is a response predictor for EGFR-TKI.
Authors: Arne Warth; Thomas Muley; Michael Meister; Albrecht Stenzinger; Michael Thomas; Peter Schirmacher; Philipp A Schnabel; Jan Budczies; Hans Hoffmann; Wilko Weichert Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-03-05 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Alexa B Turke; Kreshnik Zejnullahu; Yi-Long Wu; Youngchul Song; Dora Dias-Santagata; Eugene Lifshits; Luca Toschi; Andrew Rogers; Tony Mok; Lecia Sequist; Neal I Lindeman; Carly Murphy; Sara Akhavanfard; Beow Y Yeap; Yun Xiao; Marzia Capelletti; A John Iafrate; Charles Lee; James G Christensen; Jeffrey A Engelman; Pasi A Jänne Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2010-01-19 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: David Jackman; William Pao; Gregory J Riely; Jeffrey A Engelman; Mark G Kris; Pasi A Jänne; Thomas Lynch; Bruce E Johnson; Vincent A Miller Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-11-30 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: F Cappuzzo; P A Jänne; M Skokan; G Finocchiaro; E Rossi; C Ligorio; P A Zucali; L Terracciano; L Toschi; M Roncalli; A Destro; M Incarbone; M Alloisio; A Santoro; M Varella-Garcia Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2008-10-03 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Noriko Motoi; Janos Szoke; Gregory J Riely; Venkatraman E Seshan; Mark G Kris; Valerie W Rusch; William L Gerald; William D Travis Journal: Am J Surg Pathol Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 6.394
Authors: Jonathan E Leeman; Andreas Rimner; Joseph Montecalvo; Meier Hsu; Zhigang Zhang; Donata von Reibnitz; Kelly Panchoo; Ellen Yorke; Prasad S Adusumilli; William Travis; Abraham J Wu Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2016-09-29 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Yan Li; Yan Tan; Song Hu; Jun Xie; Zhantao Yan; Xian Zhang; Yun Zong; Han Han-Zhang; Qing Li; Chong Li Journal: J Cancer Date: 2021-04-02 Impact factor: 4.207