Literature DB >> 23974086

Effect of CYP3A4*22, POR*28, and PPARA rs4253728 on sirolimus in vitro metabolism and trough concentrations in kidney transplant recipients.

Jean-Baptiste Woillard1, Nassim Kamar, Sandra Coste, Lionel Rostaing, Pierre Marquet, Nicolas Picard.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have identified new candidate polymorphisms in the genes related to CYP3A activity or calcineurin inhibitor dose requirements in kidney transplant recipients. These genes and polymorphisms are CYP3A4 (cytochrome P450, family 3, subfamily A, polypeptide 4) (rs35599367-C>T; *22); POR [P450 (cytochrome) oxidoreductase] (rs1057868-C>T; *28); and PPARA (peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha) (rs4253728-G>A). We investigated the impact of these polymorphisms on sirolimus (SRL) in vitro hepatic metabolism, SRL trough concentrations (C0), and SRL adverse events in kidney transplant recipients.
METHODS: The clinical study included 113 stable kidney transplant patients switched from a calcineurin inhibitor to SRL (SRL C0 measured at 1, 3, and 6 months thereafter). We investigated SRL metabolism in vitro using human liver microsomes derived from individual donors (n = 31). Microsomes and patients were genotyped by use of Taqman® allelic discrimination assays. The effects of polymorphisms and covariates were studied using multilinear regression imbedded in linear mixed-effect models or logistic regressions.
RESULTS: In vitro, the CYP3A4*22 allele resulted in approximately 20% lower metabolic rates of SRL (P = 0.0411). No significant association was found between CYP3A4, CYP3A5, or PPARA genotypes and SRL dose, C0, or C0/dose in kidney transplant patients. POR*28 was associated with a minor but significant decrease in SRL log-transformed C0 [CT/TT vs CC, β = -0.15 (0.05); P = 0.0197] but this did not have any impact on the dose administered, which limited the relevance of the finding. After adjustment for nongenetic covariates and correction for false discovery finding, none of the single-nucleotide polymorphisms tested showed significant association with SRL adverse events.
CONCLUSIONS: These recently described polymorphisms do not seem to substantially influence the pharmacokinetics of SRL or the occurrence of SRL adverse events in kidney transplant recipients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23974086     DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2013.204990

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem        ISSN: 0009-9147            Impact factor:   8.327


  8 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacogenetics and immunosuppressive drugs in solid organ transplantation.

Authors:  Teun van Gelder; Ron H van Schaik; Dennis A Hesselink
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 28.314

Review 2.  Role of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors gene polymorphisms in type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome.

Authors:  Chen Dong; Hui Zhou; Chong Shen; Lu-Gang Yu; Yi Ding; Yong-Hong Zhang; Zhi-Rong Guo
Journal:  World J Diabetes       Date:  2015-05-15

3.  Evaluation of Pharmacogenetics of Drug-Metabolizing Enzymes and Drug Efflux Transporter in Renal Transplants Receiving Immunosuppressants.

Authors:  Kannan Sridharan; Shamik Shah; Anfal Jassim; Mona Hammad; Johaina Ebrahim Al Gadhban; Ola Al Segai
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-05-19

4.  Role of pharmacogenomics in dialysis and transplantation.

Authors:  Kelly Birdwell
Journal:  Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 5.  Personalization of the immunosuppressive treatment in renal transplant recipients: the great challenge in "omics" medicine.

Authors:  Gianluigi Zaza; Simona Granata; Paola Tomei; Alessandra Dalla Gassa; Antonio Lupo
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 6.  Use of pharmacogenomics in pediatric renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  Mara Medeiros; Gilberto Castañeda-Hernández; Colin J D Ross; Bruce C Carleton
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 4.599

7.  Genetic Polymorphisms and In Silico Mutagenesis Analyses of CYP2C9, CYP2D6, and CYPOR Genes in the Pakistani Population.

Authors:  Shabbir Ahmed; Jie Zhou; Zhan Zhou; Shu-Qing Chen
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 4.096

Review 8.  CYP3A422 Genotyping in Clinical Practice: Ready for Implementation?

Authors:  Tessa A M Mulder; Ruben A G van Eerden; Mirjam de With; Laure Elens; Dennis A Hesselink; Maja Matic; Sander Bins; Ron H J Mathijssen; Ron H N van Schaik
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 4.599

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.