Donald Lamm1, Raj Persad2, Maurizio Brausi3, Roger Buckley4, J Alfred Witjes5, Joan Palou6, Andreas Böhle7, Ashish M Kamat8, Marc Colombel9, Mark Soloway10. 1. Department of Surgery, University of Arizona and BCG Oncology, Phoenix, Arizona. Electronic address: dlamm@bcgoncology.com. 2. Department of Urology/Surgery, Bristol Royal Infirmary & Bristol Urological Institute, Bristol, United Kingdom. 3. Department of Urology, AUSL Modena, Modena, Italy. 4. Department of Urology, North York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 5. Department of Urology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. 6. Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. 7. Department of Urology, HELIOS Agnes Karll Hospital, Bad Schwartau, Germany. 8. Department of Urology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. 9. Department of Urology, Claude Bernard University, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France. 10. Department of Urology, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Despite being one of the most important clinical outcomes in nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer, there is currently no standard definition of disease progression. Major clinical trials and meta-analyses have used varying definitions or have failed to define this end point altogether. A standard definition of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer progression as determined by reproducible and reliable procedures is needed. We examine current definitions of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer progression, and propose a new definition that will be more clinically useful in determining patient prognosis and comparing treatment options. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The IBCG (International Bladder Cancer Group) analyzed published clinical trials and meta-analyses that examined nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer progression as of December 2012. The limitations of the definitions of progression used in these trials were considered, as were additional parameters associated with the advancement of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer. RESULTS: The most commonly used definition of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer progression is an increase in stage from nonmuscle invasive to muscle invasive disease. Although this definition is clinically important, it fails to include other important parameters of advancing disease such as progression to lamina propria invasion and increase in grade. CONCLUSIONS: The IBCG proposes the definition of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer progression as an increase in T stage from CIS or Ta to T1 (lamina propria invasion), development of T2 or greater or lymph node (N+) disease or distant metastasis (M1), or an increase in grade from low to high. Investigators should consider the use of this new definition to help standardize protocols and improve the reporting of progression.
PURPOSE: Despite being one of the most important clinical outcomes in nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer, there is currently no standard definition of disease progression. Major clinical trials and meta-analyses have used varying definitions or have failed to define this end point altogether. A standard definition of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer progression as determined by reproducible and reliable procedures is needed. We examine current definitions of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer progression, and propose a new definition that will be more clinically useful in determining patient prognosis and comparing treatment options. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The IBCG (International Bladder Cancer Group) analyzed published clinical trials and meta-analyses that examined nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer progression as of December 2012. The limitations of the definitions of progression used in these trials were considered, as were additional parameters associated with the advancement of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer. RESULTS: The most commonly used definition of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer progression is an increase in stage from nonmuscle invasive to muscle invasive disease. Although this definition is clinically important, it fails to include other important parameters of advancing disease such as progression to lamina propria invasion and increase in grade. CONCLUSIONS: The IBCG proposes the definition of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer progression as an increase in T stage from CIS or Ta to T1 (lamina propria invasion), development of T2 or greater or lymph node (N+) disease or distant metastasis (M1), or an increase in grade from low to high. Investigators should consider the use of this new definition to help standardize protocols and improve the reporting of progression.
Authors: Kareem N Rayn; Graham R Hale; Jonathan B Bloom; Samuel A Gold; Filipe L F Carvalho; Sherif Mehralivand; Marcin Czarniecki; Bradford J Wood; Maria J Merino; Peter Choyke; Barış Türkbey; Peter A Pinto; Piyush K Agarwal Journal: Diagn Interv Radiol Date: 2018-09 Impact factor: 2.630
Authors: James L Alexander; Ian D Wilson; Julian Teare; Julian R Marchesi; Jeremy K Nicholson; James M Kinross Journal: Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2017-03-08 Impact factor: 46.802
Authors: Chinedu O Mmeje; Charles C Guo; Jay B Shah; Neema Navai; H Barton Grossman; Colin P Dinney; Ashish M Kamat Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2016-02-24 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Alexander I Rolevich; Alexander G Zhegalik; Andrey A Mokhort; Alexander A Minich; Vladimir Yu Vasilevich; Sergey L Polyakov; Sergey A Krasny; Oleg G Sukonko Journal: World J Urol Date: 2016-09-07 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Zachary Klaassen; Kathy Li; Wassim Kassouf; Peter C Black; Alice Dragomir; Girish S Kulkarni Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 1.862