| Literature DB >> 23973794 |
Abstract
Although there is a great deal of research focused on identification issues related to own-versus other-race faces very few experiments have explored whether metacognitive monitoring contributes to the own-race bias. In the current experiment the typical own-race bias paradigm was modified so that type-2 signal detection measures (e.g. Higham & Arnold, 2007a,b) could be used to directly measure metacognitive monitoring at retrieval. A second goal of the experiment was to explore whether self-reported confidence ratings differed depending on whether they were directed at answer accuracy (e.g., judging a face as "studied") versus at decisions about that answer (e.g., volunteering vs. withholding that answer). Overall the results demonstrated that monitoring does contribute to the own-race bias, in that participants were better at monitoring their memory for own-race faces. Further, there was a significant difference between the two confidence measures, and the pattern of this difference depended on whether responses had been volunteered or withheld.Entities:
Keywords: 2340; 2343; 3040; Confidence; Meta-metacognition; Monitoring; Own-race bias; Strategic regulation of accuracy
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23973794 DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.07.007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Psychol (Amst) ISSN: 0001-6918