Literature DB >> 23973512

Analysis of outcome using a levator sparing technique of abdominoperineal excision of rectum and anus. Cylindrical ELAPE is not necessary in all patients.

G Ramsay1, C Parnaby, C Mackay, P Hanlon, S Ong, M Loudon.   

Abstract

AIMS: Abdominoperineal excision of rectum (APE) for cancer has a higher rate of local recurrence with a poorer outcome than stage matched anterior resection. The cylindrical excision (ELAPE) has been advocated to reduce local recurrence. However, this operation has greater morbidity and requires more post operative care. We report our outcomes from a single centre using a levator sparing dissection.
METHODS: All patients undergoing APE from January 2007-June 2011 were evaluated. Case notes operation notes and pathology results were reviewed for complications and staging. Follow-up data for survival and recurrence were obtained from the cancer registry, imaging and from clinic follow up.
RESULTS: Of all rectal cancers (n = 361), 43 had APE with curative intent. Median age was 67(IQR 59-76). Median tumour height was two centimetres from the dentate line (IQR 1-3.5 cm). Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was given in 98% of APE resections with curative intent. Median post operative hospital stay was 10 days (8-15). At a median follow up of 38 months (IQR30-49) for patients undergoing curative resection, 2 patients (4.6%) had local recurrence and overall mortality was 18.6% (n = 8).
CONCLUSION: With adequate neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, a levator sparing excision of rectum remains a safe option with less morbidity and perioperative complications than has been described for ELAPE.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  APER; Abdomino-perineal resection; Colorectal; ELAPE; Outcomes

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23973512     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.08.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0748-7983            Impact factor:   4.424


  4 in total

Review 1.  Meta-analysis of oncological outcome after abdominoperineal resection or low anterior resection for lower rectal cancer.

Authors:  Xiao-Tong Wang; De-Gang Li; Lei Li; Fan-Biao Kong; Li-Ming Pang; Wei Mai
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 3.201

2.  Preliminary Outcome of Individualized Abdominoperineal Excision for Locally Advanced Low Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Yi Zheng; Jia-Gang Han; Zhen-Jun Wang; Zhi-Gang Gao; Guang-Hui Wei; Zhi-Wei Zhai; Bao-Cheng Zhao
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 2.628

3.  Oncological outcomes of abdominoperineal resection for the treatment of low rectal cancer: A retrospective review of a single UK tertiary centre experience.

Authors:  Anwar Hussain; Fahad Mahmood; Andrew D W Torrance; Helen Clarke; Cordelia Howitt; Robin Dawson
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2018-06-26

4.  Standard versus extralevator abdominoperineal excision and oncologic outcomes for patients with distal rectal cancer: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yunfeng Zhang; Duo Wang; Lizhe Zhu; Bin Wang; Xiaoxia Ma; Bohui Shi; Yu Yan; Can Zhou
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.889

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.