Oliver Kuss1. 1. Institute of Medical Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Magdeburger Str. 8, 06097 Halle (Saale), Germany. Electronic address: oliver.kuss@medizin.uni-halle.de.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The propensity score (PS) method is increasingly used to assess treatment effects in nonrandomized trials. Although there are several methods to use the PS for analysis, matching treated and untreated patients by the PS is recommended by most researchers among other reasons because this allows assessing covariate balance before and after matching. Although the standardized difference is commonly applied to compute a measure of balance, it has two deficiencies: its distribution depends on the sample size and one cannot compare standardized differences for baseline covariates on different scales, that is, continuous, binary, ordinal, or nominal covariates. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We introduce the z-difference to measure covariate balance in matched PS analyses and illustrate it by a recent matched PS analysis from cardiac surgery. RESULTS: The z-difference is simple to calculate, can be used with second moments for continuous covariates, and in most cases can also be computed from published data. Its full advantage emerges after displaying z-differences in a Q-Q plot, which allows balance comparisons with respect to (1) a randomized trial and (2) a perfectly matched PS analysis in the sense of Rubin and Thomas. CONCLUSION: The z-difference can be used to measure covariate balance in matched PS analyses.
OBJECTIVES: The propensity score (PS) method is increasingly used to assess treatment effects in nonrandomized trials. Although there are several methods to use the PS for analysis, matching treated and untreated patients by the PS is recommended by most researchers among other reasons because this allows assessing covariate balance before and after matching. Although the standardized difference is commonly applied to compute a measure of balance, it has two deficiencies: its distribution depends on the sample size and one cannot compare standardized differences for baseline covariates on different scales, that is, continuous, binary, ordinal, or nominal covariates. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We introduce the z-difference to measure covariate balance in matched PS analyses and illustrate it by a recent matched PS analysis from cardiac surgery. RESULTS: The z-difference is simple to calculate, can be used with second moments for continuous covariates, and in most cases can also be computed from published data. Its full advantage emerges after displaying z-differences in a Q-Q plot, which allows balance comparisons with respect to (1) a randomized trial and (2) a perfectly matched PS analysis in the sense of Rubin and Thomas. CONCLUSION: The z-difference can be used to measure covariate balance in matched PS analyses.
Authors: Mariam Ujeyl; Ingrid Köster; Hans Wille; Thomas Stammschulte; Rebecca Hein; Sebastian Harder; Ursula Gundert-Remy; Julian Bleek; Peter Ihle; Helmut Schröder; Gerhard Schillinger; Anette Zawinell; Ingrid Schubert Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2018-06-16 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Elizabeth M Galik; Barbara Resnick; Sarah D Holmes; Erin Vigne; Karen Lynch; Jeanette Ellis; Shijun Zhu; Erik Barr Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2021-01-15 Impact factor: 7.802
Authors: Anne Burden; Nicolas Roche; Cristiana Miglio; Elizabeth V Hillyer; Dirkje S Postma; Ron Mc Herings; Jetty A Overbeek; Javaria Mona Khalid; Daniela van Eickels; David B Price Journal: Pragmat Obs Res Date: 2017-03-22
Authors: Marcin Kaczmarczyk; Jerzy Pacholewicz; Aleksandra Kaczmarczyk; Krzysztof Filipiak; Tomasz Hrapkowicz; Michał Zembala Journal: Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol Date: 2022-03-24
Authors: Eduard Falk; Daniel Schlieper; Patrick van Caster; Matthias J Lutterbeck; Jacqueline Schwartz; Joachim Cordes; Ina Grau; Peter Kienbaum; Martin Neukirchen Journal: BMC Palliat Care Date: 2020-01-03 Impact factor: 3.234