BACKGROUND: In adults, left ventricular (LV) systolic twist is an important factor that determines LV filling, both at rest and during exercise. In children, lower LV twist has been demonstrated at rest, but its adaptation during exercise and its functional consequences on LV filling are unknown. METHODS: Using speckle-tracking echocardiography, LV twist-untwist mechanics were studied in 25 children (aged 10-12 years) and 20 young adults (aged 18-44 years) at rest and during three exercise workloads performed at 20%, 30%, and 40% of their maximal aerobic power. RESULTS: At rest, LV twist was lower in children, because of a higher temporal dispersion of peak rotation between base and apex. During exercise, the increase of basal rotation was blunted in children compared with adults (-6.7 ± 2.7° vs -9.0 ± 2.0° at 40% of maximal aerobic power, P < .05). Consequently, LV twist increased to a lesser extent (13.0 ± 5.0° vs 15.8 ± 4.5° at 40% of maximal aerobic power, P < .05). The increase in LV untwisting rates during exercise was also lower in children, leading to a lower percentage of untwisting during early diastole (8 ± 8% vs 29 ± 20% at 40% of maximal aerobic power, P < .001). Consequently, during early diastole, the normal timing of diastolic events observed in young adults, with untwist occurring before radial displacement, was blunted in children. Nevertheless, children exhibited normal LV filling due to higher diastolic radial and longitudinal strain rates. CONCLUSIONS: Twist-untwist mechanics may evolve with advancing age. In children, early diastolic LV untwisting appears to be less important than in adults. Their better LV intrinsic myocardial relaxation may ensure adequate LV filling during exercise without dependence on the additional effect of suction resulting from LV energy recoil.
BACKGROUND: In adults, left ventricular (LV) systolic twist is an important factor that determines LV filling, both at rest and during exercise. In children, lower LV twist has been demonstrated at rest, but its adaptation during exercise and its functional consequences on LV filling are unknown. METHODS: Using speckle-tracking echocardiography, LV twist-untwist mechanics were studied in 25 children (aged 10-12 years) and 20 young adults (aged 18-44 years) at rest and during three exercise workloads performed at 20%, 30%, and 40% of their maximal aerobic power. RESULTS: At rest, LV twist was lower in children, because of a higher temporal dispersion of peak rotation between base and apex. During exercise, the increase of basal rotation was blunted in children compared with adults (-6.7 ± 2.7° vs -9.0 ± 2.0° at 40% of maximal aerobic power, P < .05). Consequently, LV twist increased to a lesser extent (13.0 ± 5.0° vs 15.8 ± 4.5° at 40% of maximal aerobic power, P < .05). The increase in LV untwisting rates during exercise was also lower in children, leading to a lower percentage of untwisting during early diastole (8 ± 8% vs 29 ± 20% at 40% of maximal aerobic power, P < .001). Consequently, during early diastole, the normal timing of diastolic events observed in young adults, with untwist occurring before radial displacement, was blunted in children. Nevertheless, children exhibited normal LV filling due to higher diastolic radial and longitudinal strain rates. CONCLUSIONS: Twist-untwist mechanics may evolve with advancing age. In children, early diastolic LV untwisting appears to be less important than in adults. Their better LV intrinsic myocardial relaxation may ensure adequate LV filling during exercise without dependence on the additional effect of suction resulting from LV energy recoil.
Authors: Guido E Pieles; Lucy Gowing; Jonathan Forsey; Paramanantham Ramanujam; Felicity Miller; A Graham Stuart; Craig A Williams Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2015-10-16 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Alexander Beaumont; Fergal Grace; Joanna Richards; John Hough; David Oxborough; Nicholas Sculthorpe Journal: Sports Med Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: Guido E Pieles; Lucy Gowing; Diane Ryding; Dave Perry; Steven R McNally; A Graham Stuart; Craig A Williams Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2020-10-08 Impact factor: 3.078