Literature DB >> 23972404

Double-blind food challenges in children in general paediatric practice: useful and safe, but not without pitfalls.

C J Oole-Groen1, P L P Brand2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe results of double-blind placebo-controlled food challenges (DBPCFC) with cow's milk, hen's egg, soy, peanut and hazelnut in general paediatric practice.
METHODS: Food challenges were performed between January 2006 and June 2011, in children 0-18 years of age, on two half-day hospital admissions with a one-week interval. Tests were performed in a double-blind fashion following a standardised protocol with validated recipes.
RESULTS: Overall, 234 food challenges were performed in 209 children: 160 with cow's milk, 35 with peanut, 21 with hen's egg, 11 with hazelnuts, and 7 with soy. In two thirds of the cases, the DBPCFC was negative (cow's milk: 57.5%; peanut: 40.0%; hen's egg: 66.7%, hazelnut: 90.9%, soy: 100%). The only patient characteristic significantly associated with a positive DBPCFC was the presence of symptoms from three different organ systems (p=0.007). Serious systemic allergic reactions with wheeze or anaphylaxis occurred in only two children (0.9%). Symptoms were recorded on 29.3% of placebo days. In 30/137 children with a negative test (22%), symptoms returned when reintroducing the allergen into the diet, mostly (66.7%) transient. Of the 85 tests regarded as positive by the attending physician, 19 (22.4%) did not meet predefined criteria for a positive test. This was particularly common with non-specific symptoms.
CONCLUSION: A DBPCFC can be safely performed in a general hospital for a range of food allergens. The test result is negative in most cases except for peanut. Non-specific symptoms may hamper the interpretation of the DBPCFC, increasing the risk of a false-positive result.
Copyright © 2013 SEICAP. Published by Elsevier Espana. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anaphylaxis; Double blind placebo controlled food challenge; Food allergy; Methodology

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23972404     DOI: 10.1016/j.aller.2013.06.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Allergol Immunopathol (Madr)        ISSN: 0301-0546            Impact factor:   1.667


  4 in total

1.  Delayed clinical and ex vivo response to mammalian meat in patients with IgE to galactose-alpha-1,3-galactose.

Authors:  Scott P Commins; Hayley R James; Whitney Stevens; Shawna L Pochan; Michael H Land; Carol King; Susan Mozzicato; Thomas A E Platts-Mills
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 10.793

2.  Using a physician panel to estimate food allergy prevalence in a longitudinal birth cohort.

Authors:  Jerel M Ezell; Dennis R Ownby; Edward M Zoratti; Suzanne Havstad; Charlotte Nicholas; Christian Nageotte; Rana Misiak; Robert Enberg; Christine Cole Johnson; Christine L M Joseph
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2014-04-19       Impact factor: 3.797

Review 3.  The dilemma of open or double-blind food challenges in diagnosing food allergy in children: Design of the ALDORADO trial.

Authors:  Wouter W de Weger; Aline B Sprikkelman; Catherina E M Herpertz; Gerbrich N van der Meulen; Judith M Vonk; Arvid W A Kamps; Gerard H Koppelman
Journal:  Pediatr Allergy Immunol       Date:  2021-09-09       Impact factor: 5.464

4.  Reintroduction failure after negative food challenges in adults is common and mainly due to atypical symptoms.

Authors:  Astrid Versluis; André C Knulst; Francine C van Erp; Mark A Blankestijn; Yolanda Meijer; Thuy-My Le; Harmieke van Os-Medendorp
Journal:  Clin Exp Allergy       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 5.018

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.