Literature DB >> 23972339

Salvage radiotherapy after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Henk G van der Poel1, Corinne Tillier, Willem de Blok, Cenk Acar, Erik H A M van Muilekom.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the incidence and efficacy of salvage radiotherapy (SRT) after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). RARP has been linked to an increased use of adjuvant treatments. If RARP would result in an increased local recurrence rate, response rates to SRT could be expected to be better after RARP than after more conventional methods of prostatectomy. The incidence and efficacy of SRT in a RARP population were compared with nomogram prediction.
METHODS: Patient data were prospectively registered. Biochemical recurrence (BCR) was defined as a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≥0.1 ng/mL. SRT was offered to men with BCR after RARP. The Stephenson nomogram predictions were compared with outcome after SRT.
RESULTS: Of 1087 men, 157 (14.4%) received SRT for BCR or persistent PSA levels during a median follow-up of 1078 days after RARP. Median PSA level before SRT was 0.2 ng/mL. Three-year BCR-free rate was 64% for men after SRT. pN (pNx, pN0, pN1) and PSA level before SRT were independent predictors of the BCR interval after SRT. Men with more extensive fascia preservation were more likely to respond favorably to SRT. The Stephenson nomogram prediction showed a concordance rate of 0.66 in this RARP population. Limitations of the study are the retrospective design and limited follow-up duration.
CONCLUSION: In our RARP series, the use and efficacy of SRT were comparable with open prostatectomy series. The Stephenson nomogram reliably predicted outcome in patients with RARP with SRT, suggesting that similar characteristics predict response to SRT after RARP compared with open prostatectomy.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23972339     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.04.057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  5 in total

1.  Localizing sites of disease in patients with rising serum prostate-specific antigen up to 1ng/ml following prostatectomy: How much information can conventional imaging provide?

Authors:  Hebert Alberto Vargas; Alexandre G Martin-Malburet; Toshikazu Takeda; Renato B Corradi; James Eastham; Andreas Wibmer; Evis Sala; Michael J Zelefsky; Wolfgang A Weber; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 3.498

2.  Functional and oncological outcomes of salvage external beam radiotherapy following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a Canadian cohort.

Authors:  Khaled Ajib; Marc Zanaty; Mansour Alnazari; Emad Rajih; Pierre-Alain Hueber; Mila Mansour; Roger Valdivieso; Cristina Negrean; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Daniel Taussky; Guila Delouya; Assaad El-Hakim; Kevin C Zorn
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Refining the American Urological Association and American Society for Radiation Oncology guideline for adjuvant radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy using the pathologic Gleason score.

Authors:  Wan Song; Young Suk Kwon; Seong Soo Jeon; Isaac Yi Kim
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 4.  Stereotactic Radiotherapy after Radical Prostatectomy in Patients with Prostate Cancer in the Adjuvant or Salvage Setting: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Christina Schröder; Hongjian Tang; Paul Windisch; Daniel Rudolf Zwahlen; André Buchali; Erwin Vu; Tilman Bostel; Tanja Sprave; Thomas Zilli; Vedang Murthy; Robert Förster
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 6.639

5.  Salvage radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy: prediction of biochemical outcomes.

Authors:  Ohseong Kwon; Ki Bom Kim; Young Ik Lee; Seok-Soo Byun; Jae-Sung Kim; Sang Eun Lee; Sung Kyu Hong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.