Literature DB >> 23972214

Lexical quality and eye movements: individual differences in the perceptual span of skilled adult readers.

Aaron Veldre1, Sally Andrews.   

Abstract

Two experiments used the gaze-contingent moving-window paradigm to investigate whether reading comprehension and spelling ability modulate the perceptual span of skilled adult readers during sentence reading. Highly proficient reading and spelling were both associated with increased use information to the right of fixation, but did not systematically modulate the extraction of information to the left of fixation. Individuals who were high in both reading and spelling ability showed the greatest benefit from window sizes larger than 11 characters, primarily because of increases in forward saccade length. They were also significantly more disrupted by being denied close parafoveal information than those poor in reading and/or spelling. These results suggest that, in addition to supporting rapid lexical retrieval of fixated words, the high quality lexical representations indexed by the combination of high reading and spelling ability support efficient processing of parafoveal information and effective saccadic targeting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23972214     DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2013.826258

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  16 in total

1.  Relationship between individual differences in speech processing and cognitive functions.

Authors:  Jinghua Ou; Sam-Po Law; Roxana Fung
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-12

2.  The perceptual span in Tibetan reading.

Authors:  Aiping Wang; Ming Yan; Bei Wang; Gaoding Jia; Albrecht W Inhoff
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-03-26

3.  Contributions of reader- and text-level characteristics to eye-movement patterns during passage reading.

Authors:  Victor Kuperman; Kazunaga Matsuki; Julie A Van Dyke
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  When experience meets language statistics: Individual variability in processing English compound words.

Authors:  Kaitlin Falkauskas; Victor Kuperman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Eye-Movement Control in RAN and Reading.

Authors:  Victor Kuperman; Julie A Van Dyke; Regina Henry
Journal:  Sci Stud Read       Date:  2016-01-08

6.  Predicting eye-movement characteristics across multiple tasks from working memory and executive control.

Authors:  Steven G Luke; Emily S Darowski; Shawn D Gale
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-07

7.  The role of orthographic neighbourhood effects in lateralized lexical decision: a replication study and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Adam J Parker; Ciara Egan; Jack H Grant; Sophie Harte; Brad T Hudson; Zoe V J Woodhead
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Effects of Spatial Frequencies on Word Identification by Fast and Slow Readers: Evidence from Eye Movements.

Authors:  Timothy R Jordan; Jasmine Dixon; Victoria A McGowan; Stoyan Kurtev; Kevin B Paterson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-09-28

9.  Positive Psychology Broadens Readers' Attentional Scope During L2 Reading: Evidence From Eye Movements.

Authors:  Chi Yui Leung; Hitoshi Mikami; Lisa Yoshikawa
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-10-04

10.  A Comparison of Eye Movement Measures across Reading Efficiency Quartile Groups in Elementary, Middle, and High School Students in the U.S.

Authors:  Alexandra N Spichtig; Jeffrey P Pascoe; John D Ferrara; Christian Vorstius
Journal:  J Eye Mov Res       Date:  2017-12-02       Impact factor: 0.957

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.