Literature DB >> 23972196

Prescription peer academic detailing to reduce inappropriate prescribing for older patients: a cluster randomised controlled trial.

Sture Rognstad1, Mette Brekke, Arne Fetveit, Ingvild Dalen, Jørund Straand.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Older patients are at particular risk for adverse drug reactions. In older people, interventions targeting potentially inappropriate prescriptions (PIPs) are considered important measures to minimise drug-related harm, especially in the general practice setting where most prescriptions for older patients are issued. AIM: To study the effects of a multifaceted educational intervention on GPs' PIPs for older patients. DESIGN AND
SETTING: This was a cluster randomised, educational intervention study in Norwegian general practice. Pre-study data were captured from January 2005 to December 2005 and post-study data from June 2006 to June 2007. The educational intervention was carried out from January 2006 to June 2006.
METHOD: Eighty continuing medical education (CME) groups (465 GPs) were randomised to receive the educational intervention on GPs' PIPs for older patients (41 CME groups; 256 GPs) or another educational intervention (39 CME groups; 209 GPs); these two groups acted as controls for each other. GPs' prescription data from before and after the intervention were assessed against a list of 13 explicit PIP criteria for patients aged ≥70 years. In the CME groups, trained GPs carried out an educational programme, including an audit, focusing on the 13 criteria and their rationale.
RESULTS: A total of 449 GPs (96.6%) completed the study; 250 in the intervention group and 199 in the control group. After adjusting for baseline differences and clustering effects, a reduction relative to baseline of 10.3% (95% confidence interval = 5.9 to 15.0) PIPs per 100 patients aged ≥70 years was obtained.
CONCLUSION: Educational outreach visits with feedback and audit, using GPs as academic detailers in GPs' CME groups, reduced PIPs for older patients aged ≥70 years in general practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23972196      PMCID: PMC3722832          DOI: 10.3399/bjgp13X670688

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  41 in total

Review 1.  Cost effectiveness of continuing professional development in health care: a critical review of the evidence.

Authors:  C A Brown; C R Belfield; S J Field
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-03-16

2.  Principles of educational outreach ('academic detailing') to improve clinical decision making.

Authors:  S B Soumerai; J Avorn
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-01-26       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 3.  Local opinion leaders: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes.

Authors:  Gerd Flodgren; Elena Parmelli; Gaby Doumit; Melina Gattellari; Mary Ann O'Brien; Jeremy Grimshaw; Martin P Eccles
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-08-10

Review 4.  Printed educational materials: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes.

Authors:  Anna P Farmer; France Légaré; Lucile Turcot; Jeremy Grimshaw; Emma Harvey; Jessie L McGowan; Fredric Wolf
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-07-16

Review 5.  Explicit criteria for determining inappropriate medication use in nursing home residents. UCLA Division of Geriatric Medicine.

Authors:  M H Beers; J G Ouslander; I Rollingher; D B Reuben; J Brooks; J C Beck
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1991-09

6.  Inappropriate prescribing and health outcomes in elderly veteran outpatients.

Authors:  K E Schmader; J T Hanlon; P B Landsman; G P Samsa; I K Lewis; M Weinberger
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.154

7.  Fatal adverse drug events: the paradox of drug treatment.

Authors:  I Buajordet; J Ebbesen; J Erikssen; O Brørs; T Hilberg
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 8.989

8.  Admissions caused by adverse drug events to internal medicine and emergency departments in hospitals: a longitudinal population-based study.

Authors:  Sebastian Schneeweiss; Joerg Hasford; Martin Göttler; Annemarie Hoffmann; Ann-Kathrin Riethling; Jerry Avorn
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2002-06-12       Impact factor: 2.953

9.  The Norwegian General Practice (NORGEP) criteria for assessing potentially inappropriate prescriptions to elderly patients. A modified Delphi study.

Authors:  Sture Rognstad; Mette Brekke; Arne Fetveit; Olav Spigset; Torgeir Bruun Wyller; Jørund Straand
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.581

10.  The Hawthorne Effect: a randomised, controlled trial.

Authors:  Rob McCarney; James Warner; Steve Iliffe; Robbert van Haselen; Mark Griffin; Peter Fisher
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2007-07-03       Impact factor: 4.615

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Deprescribing for Community-Dwelling Older Adults: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hanna E Bloomfield; Nancy Greer; Amy M Linsky; Jennifer Bolduc; Todd Naidl; Orly Vardeny; Roderick MacDonald; Lauren McKenzie; Timothy J Wilt
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Effectiveness of a Multifaceted Intervention for Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing in Older Patients in Primary Care: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial (OPTI-SCRIPT Study).

Authors:  Barbara Clyne; Susan M Smith; Carmel M Hughes; Fiona Boland; Marie C Bradley; Janine A Cooper; Tom Fahey
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 5.166

3.  A cluster randomised controlled trial of a pharmacist-led collaborative intervention to improve statin prescribing and attainment of cholesterol targets in primary care.

Authors:  Richard Lowrie; Suzanne M Lloyd; Alex McConnachie; Jill Morrison
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Factors influencing prescribing of fall-risk-increasing drugs to the elderly: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Hege Therese Bell; Aslak Steinsbekk; Anne Gerd Granas
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 2.581

5.  A focus group study to understand biases and confounders in a cluster randomized controlled trial on low back pain in primary care in Norway.

Authors:  Erik L Werner; Ida Løchting; Kjersti Storheim; Margreth Grotle
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 2.497

6.  General practitioners' prescriptions of benzodiazepines, Z-hypnotics and opioid analgesics for elderly patients during direct and indirect contacts. A cross-sectional, observational study.

Authors:  Anne Cathrine Sundseth; Svein Gjelstad; Jorund Straand; Elin O Rosvold
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2018-04-14       Impact factor: 2.581

7.  A qualitative study exploring the acceptability of the McNulty-Zelen design for randomised controlled trials evaluating educational interventions.

Authors:  Cliodna McNulty; Ellie J Ricketts; Claire Rugman; Angela Hogan; Andre Charlett; Rona Campbell
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 2.497

8.  Sustained effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention to reduce potentially inappropriate prescribing in older patients in primary care (OPTI-SCRIPT study).

Authors:  Barbara Clyne; Susan M Smith; Carmel M Hughes; Fiona Boland; Janine A Cooper; Tom Fahey
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 9.  The use of external change agents to promote quality improvement and organizational change in healthcare organizations: a systematic review.

Authors:  Esra Alagoz; Ming-Yuan Chih; Mary Hitchcock; Randall Brown; Andrew Quanbeck
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Improving drug prescription in general practice using a novel quality improvement model.

Authors:  Nicolas M F Øyane; Morten Finckenhagen; Sabine Ruths; Geir Thue; Anne Karin Lindahl
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 2.581

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.