BACKGROUND:Older patients are at particular risk for adverse drug reactions. In older people, interventions targeting potentially inappropriate prescriptions (PIPs) are considered important measures to minimise drug-related harm, especially in the general practice setting where most prescriptions for older patients are issued. AIM: To study the effects of a multifaceted educational intervention on GPs' PIPs for older patients. DESIGN AND SETTING: This was a cluster randomised, educational intervention study in Norwegian general practice. Pre-study data were captured from January 2005 to December 2005 and post-study data from June 2006 to June 2007. The educational intervention was carried out from January 2006 to June 2006. METHOD:Eighty continuing medical education (CME) groups (465 GPs) were randomised to receive the educational intervention on GPs' PIPs for older patients (41 CME groups; 256 GPs) or another educational intervention (39 CME groups; 209 GPs); these two groups acted as controls for each other. GPs' prescription data from before and after the intervention were assessed against a list of 13 explicit PIP criteria for patients aged ≥70 years. In the CME groups, trained GPs carried out an educational programme, including an audit, focusing on the 13 criteria and their rationale. RESULTS:A total of 449 GPs (96.6%) completed the study; 250 in the intervention group and 199 in the control group. After adjusting for baseline differences and clustering effects, a reduction relative to baseline of 10.3% (95% confidence interval = 5.9 to 15.0) PIPs per 100 patients aged ≥70 years was obtained. CONCLUSION: Educational outreach visits with feedback and audit, using GPs as academic detailers in GPs' CME groups, reduced PIPs for older patients aged ≥70 years in general practice.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Older patients are at particular risk for adverse drug reactions. In older people, interventions targeting potentially inappropriate prescriptions (PIPs) are considered important measures to minimise drug-related harm, especially in the general practice setting where most prescriptions for older patients are issued. AIM: To study the effects of a multifaceted educational intervention on GPs' PIPs for older patients. DESIGN AND SETTING: This was a cluster randomised, educational intervention study in Norwegian general practice. Pre-study data were captured from January 2005 to December 2005 and post-study data from June 2006 to June 2007. The educational intervention was carried out from January 2006 to June 2006. METHOD: Eighty continuing medical education (CME) groups (465 GPs) were randomised to receive the educational intervention on GPs' PIPs for older patients (41 CME groups; 256 GPs) or another educational intervention (39 CME groups; 209 GPs); these two groups acted as controls for each other. GPs' prescription data from before and after the intervention were assessed against a list of 13 explicit PIP criteria for patients aged ≥70 years. In the CME groups, trained GPs carried out an educational programme, including an audit, focusing on the 13 criteria and their rationale. RESULTS: A total of 449 GPs (96.6%) completed the study; 250 in the intervention group and 199 in the control group. After adjusting for baseline differences and clustering effects, a reduction relative to baseline of 10.3% (95% confidence interval = 5.9 to 15.0) PIPs per 100 patients aged ≥70 years was obtained. CONCLUSION: Educational outreach visits with feedback and audit, using GPs as academic detailers in GPs' CME groups, reduced PIPs for older patients aged ≥70 years in general practice.
Authors: Gerd Flodgren; Elena Parmelli; Gaby Doumit; Melina Gattellari; Mary Ann O'Brien; Jeremy Grimshaw; Martin P Eccles Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2011-08-10
Authors: Anna P Farmer; France Légaré; Lucile Turcot; Jeremy Grimshaw; Emma Harvey; Jessie L McGowan; Fredric Wolf Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2008-07-16
Authors: Sture Rognstad; Mette Brekke; Arne Fetveit; Olav Spigset; Torgeir Bruun Wyller; Jørund Straand Journal: Scand J Prim Health Care Date: 2009 Impact factor: 2.581
Authors: Rob McCarney; James Warner; Steve Iliffe; Robbert van Haselen; Mark Griffin; Peter Fisher Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2007-07-03 Impact factor: 4.615
Authors: Barbara Clyne; Susan M Smith; Carmel M Hughes; Fiona Boland; Marie C Bradley; Janine A Cooper; Tom Fahey Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2015-11 Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Anne Cathrine Sundseth; Svein Gjelstad; Jorund Straand; Elin O Rosvold Journal: Scand J Prim Health Care Date: 2018-04-14 Impact factor: 2.581
Authors: Barbara Clyne; Susan M Smith; Carmel M Hughes; Fiona Boland; Janine A Cooper; Tom Fahey Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2016-06-02 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Nicolas M F Øyane; Morten Finckenhagen; Sabine Ruths; Geir Thue; Anne Karin Lindahl Journal: Scand J Prim Health Care Date: 2021-06-26 Impact factor: 2.581