Literature DB >> 23971913

Thresholds for platelet reactivity to predict clinical events after coronary intervention are different in patients with and without diabetes mellitus.

Fabio Mangiacapra1, Aaron Peace, Emanuele Barbato, Giuseppe Patti, Laura Gatto, Elisabetta Ricottini, Bernard De Bruyne, Germano Di Sciascio, William Wijns.   

Abstract

Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) have increased baseline platelet reactivity and impaired response to antiplatelet drugs, compared to non-diabetics. Aim of the present study was to investigate whether thresholds for high platelet reactivity (HPR) that predict clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are similar in diabetic compared to non-diabetic patients. A total of 640 (32.6% with DM) consecutive patients taking aspirin and clopidogrel undergoing elective PCI were recruited. Platelet reactivity was measured immediately before the procedure with the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay. Primary end point was the 30-day incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in relation to the presence of DM and to P2Y12 reaction units (PRU) distribution. The optimal cut-off to predict 30-day MACE was a PRU value of >256 in diabetics, and a PRU value of >229 in non-diabetics. Accordingly, we redefined HPR on the basis of these two specific thresholds (HPR-ST), now including 60/209 (29%) diabetic patients with PRU >256, and 130/431 (30%) non-diabetic patients with PRU >229. HPR-ST discriminates significantly (p < 0.001) patients with and without MACE, with a diagnostic accuracy of 73%. The combination of DM and HPR-ST resulted in the highest incidence of MACE (23.3%; p for trend <0.001). At multivariate analysis, HPR-ST was the strongest independent predictor of 30-day MACE (odds ratio 4.80, 95% confidence interval 2.58-8.93; p < 0.001). Redefining HPR based on specific thresholds for patients with and without DM significantly improves prediction of MACE post-PCI. Patients with HPR-ST, especially in the presence of DM, are at increased risk for ischemic events and may benefit from more aggressive antiplatelet strategies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diabetes; PCI; platelet reactivity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23971913     DOI: 10.3109/09537104.2013.824562

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Platelets        ISSN: 0953-7104            Impact factor:   3.862


  5 in total

1.  Platelet function testing in contemporary clinical and interventional practice.

Authors:  Francesco Franchi; Fabiana Rollini; Jung Rae Cho; Elisabetta Ferrante; Dominick J Angiolillo
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2014-05

Review 2.  Current antiplatelet treatment strategy in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Jung Hwa Jung; Udaya S Tantry; Paul A Gurbel; Young-Hoon Jeong
Journal:  Diabetes Metab J       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 5.376

3.  Comparison of 1-year clinical outcomes between prasugrel and ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in type 2 diabetes patients with acute myocardial infarction underwent successful percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Kye Taek Ahn; Seok-Woo Seong; Ung Lim Choi; Seon-Ah Jin; Jun Hyung Kim; Jae-Hwan Lee; Si Wan Choi; Myung Ho Jeong; Shung Chull Chae; Young Jo Kim; Chong Jin Kim; Hyo-Soo Kim; Myeong-Chan Cho; Hyeon-Cheol Gwon; Jin-Ok Jeong; In-Whan Seong
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.817

4.  Should CYP2C19 Genotyping Be Recommended as a Straight Forward Approach to Optimize Clopidogrel Utilization in Patients with Ischemic Stroke Complicated by Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus?

Authors:  Jialin Sun; Jing Li; Ping Leng; Chen Sun; Wen Xu; Zhenhuan Zhao; Xiao Li; Xiaolei Zhang
Journal:  Pharmgenomics Pers Med       Date:  2020-11-23

5.  Prevalence and predictors of dual antiplatelet therapy prolongation beyond one year in patients with acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Giuseppe Patti; Ilaria Cavallari; Emilia Antonucci; Paolo Calabrò; Plinio Cirillo; Paolo Gresele; Gualtiero Palareti; Vittorio Pengo; Pasquale Pignatelli; Elisabetta Ricottini; Rossella Marcucci
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.