Literature DB >> 23971818

Separated by a common language: awareness of term usage differences between languages and disciplines in biopreparedness.

M Gunnar Andersson, Katharina Tomuzia, Charlotta Löfström, Bernd Appel, Luca Bano, Haralampos Keremidis, Rickard Knutsson, Mikael Leijon, Susanna Ekströmer Lövgren, Dario De Medici, Andrea Menrath, Bart J van Rotterdam, Henk J Wisselink, Gary C Barker.   

Abstract

Preparedness for bioterrorism is based on communication between people in organizations who are educated and trained in several disciplines, including law enforcement, health, and science. Various backgrounds, cultures, and vocabularies generate difficulties in understanding and interpretating terms and concepts, which may impair communication. This is especially true in emergency situations, in which the need for clarity and consistency is vital. The EU project AniBioThreat initiated methods and made a rough estimate of the terms and concepts that are crucial for an incident, and a pilot database with key terms and definitions has been constructed. Analysis of collected terms and sources has shown that many of the participating organizations use various international standards in their area of expertise. The same term often represents different concepts in the standards from different sectors, or, alternatively, different terms were used to represent the same or similar concepts. The use of conflicting terminology can be problematic for decision makers and communicators in planning and prevention or when handling an incident. Since the CBRN area has roots in multiple disciplines, each with its own evolving terminology, it may not be realistic to achieve unequivocal communication through a standardized vocabulary and joint definitions for words from common language. We suggest that a communication strategy should include awareness of alternative definitions and ontologies and the ability to talk and write without relying on the implicit knowledge underlying specialized jargon. Consequently, cross-disciplinary communication skills should be part of training of personnel in the CBRN field. In addition, a searchable repository of terms and definitions from relevant organizations and authorities would be a valuable addition to existing glossaries for improving awareness concerning bioterrorism prevention planning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23971818      PMCID: PMC3752503          DOI: 10.1089/bsp.2012.0083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biosecur Bioterror        ISSN: 1538-7135


  7 in total

Review 1.  Natural Language Processing methods and systems for biomedical ontology learning.

Authors:  Kaihong Liu; William R Hogan; Rebecca S Crowley
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2010-07-18       Impact factor: 6.317

2.  Accidental and deliberate microbiological contamination in the feed and food chains--how biotraceability may improve the response to bioterrorism.

Authors:  Rickard Knutsson; Bart van Rotterdam; Patrick Fach; Dario De Medici; Martina Fricker; Charlotta Löfström; Joakim Agren; Bo Segerman; Gunnar Andersson; Peter Wielinga; Lucia Fenicia; Jeffrey Skiby; Anna Charlotte Schultz; Monika Ehling-Schulz
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 5.277

3.  The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments.

Authors:  Stephen A Bustin; Vladimir Benes; Jeremy A Garson; Jan Hellemans; Jim Huggett; Mikael Kubista; Reinhold Mueller; Tania Nolan; Michael W Pfaffl; Gregory L Shipley; Jo Vandesompele; Carl T Wittwer
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 8.327

4.  Some limitations of "Risk = Threat x Vulnerability x Consequence" for risk analysis of terrorist attacks.

Authors:  Louis Anthony Tony Cox
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2008-10-16       Impact factor: 4.000

5.  Sampling plans for aflatoxin analysis in peanuts and corn. Report of an FAO technical consultation. Rome.

Authors: 
Journal:  FAO Food Nutr Pap       Date:  1993

6.  The Units Ontology: a tool for integrating units of measurement in science.

Authors:  Georgios V Gkoutos; Paul N Schofield; Robert Hoehndorf
Journal:  Database (Oxford)       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 3.451

Review 7.  Forty years of SNOMED: a literature review.

Authors:  Ronald Cornet; Nicolette de Keizer
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2008-10-27       Impact factor: 2.796

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Integrated interdisciplinary training in the radiological sciences.

Authors:  D J Brenner; M Vazquez; M Buonanno; S A Amundson; A W Bigelow; G Garty; A D Harken; T K Hei; S A Marino; B Ponnaiya; G Randers-Pehrson; Y Xu
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 3.039

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.