Literature DB >> 23971771

Rational manipulation of the standard laparoscopic instruments for single-incision laparoscopic right colectomy.

Makoto Watanabe1, Masahiko Murakami, Takashi Kato, Toru Onaka, Takeshi Aoki.   

Abstract

This report clarifies the rational manipulation of standard laparoscopic instruments for single-incision laparoscopic right colectomy (SILRC) using the SILS Port. We classified the manipulations required into 4 techniques. Vertical manipulation was required for medial-to-lateral retroperitoneal dissection. Frontal manipulation was needed for extension and establishment of a retroperitoneal plane. External crossing manipulation was used for dissection or ligation of the ileocolic or right colic vessels. Internal crossing manipulation was required for mobilization from the cecum to ascending colon. We performed SILRC for a series of 30 consecutive patients. One additional port was needed in 5 of the patients (16.7%) because of severe adhesion between the ileum and abdominal wall. No intraoperative complications were encountered. Four rational manipulations of the standard laparoscopic instruments are required for SILRC using the SILS Port. However, more experience and comparative trials are needed to determine the exact role of SILRC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23971771      PMCID: PMC3756840          DOI: 10.9738/INTSURG-D-12-00037.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Surg        ISSN: 0020-8868


  10 in total

Review 1.  Single-incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) in general surgery: a review of current practice.

Authors:  Farid Froghi; Mikael Hans Sodergren; Ara Darzi; Paraskevas Paraskeva
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.719

2.  Randomized clinical trial of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  P-C Lee; C Lo; P-S Lai; J-J Chang; S-J Huang; M-T Lin; P-H Lee
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Single-incision laparoscopic surgery for right hemicolectomy: our initial experience with 10 cases.

Authors:  M T C Wong; K H Ng; K S Ho; K W Eu
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  Single-port laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a safe alternative to conventional laparoscopy.

Authors:  Joshua A Waters; Michael J Guzman; Alyssa D Fajardo; Don J Selzer; Eric A Wiebke; Bruce W Robb; Virgilio V George
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Different pain scores in single transumbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Evangelos C Tsimoyiannis; Konstantinos E Tsimogiannis; George Pappas-Gogos; Charalampos Farantos; Nikolaos Benetatos; Paraskevi Mavridou; Adamantia Manataki
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-02-20       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Single-port laparoscopic surgery: an overview.

Authors:  John R Romanelli; David B Earle
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-04-04       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Single port laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with D3 dissection for advanced colon cancer.

Authors:  Sung Il Choi; Kil Yeon Lee; Sun Jin Park; Suk-Hwan Lee
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Single-incision laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: safety and feasibility in a series of consecutive cases.

Authors:  Diego I Ramos-Valadez; Chirag B Patel; Madhu Ragupathi; T Bartley Pickron; Eric M Haas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-04-03       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Single port access (SPA) surgery--a 24-month experience.

Authors:  Erica R Podolsky; Paul G Curcillo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-02-13       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Single port access laparoscopic right hemicolectomy.

Authors:  Pascal Bucher; François Pugin; Philippe Morel
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-07-08       Impact factor: 2.571

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.