Literature DB >> 23970662

Is out-of-pocket cost a barrier to receiving repeat tests for chlamydia and gonorrhoea?

L Shi1, Y Xie, J Liu, P Kissinger, M Khan.   

Abstract

We aimed to examine whether out-of-pocket (OOP) costs associated with chlamydia (CT) and gonorrhoea (GC) screening tests is a barrier to receiving CT/GC re-screening and follow-up annual screening. A major health insurance claims database 2006-2010 was used for analysis. The date of first CT/GC diagnosis was used as the index date, and OOP costs at index date for screening tests were retrieved. A re-screening test and an annual screening were defined as tests that occurred within 90-180 days and 181-395 days of the index date, respectively. Re-screening rates were 11.7% and 10.9% and annual screening rates were 24.7% and 23.7% for CT and GC cases, respectively. Compared with the CT patients without OOP expenses, those with OOP expenses of $30 or higher had significantly reduced likelihood of receiving re-screening and annual screening. Similar results were found for GC patients. We concluded that OOP costs serve as a significant barrier to re-screening and annual screening.

Entities:  

Keywords:  STIs; chlamydia; follow-up annual screening; gonorrhoea; out-of-pocket cost; re-screening; sexually transmitted infections

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23970662     DOI: 10.1177/0956462412472821

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J STD AIDS        ISSN: 0956-4624            Impact factor:   1.359


  1 in total

1.  Willingness to Use Health Insurance at a Sexually Transmitted Disease Clinic: A Survey of Patients at 21 US Clinics.

Authors:  William S Pearson; Ryan Cramer; Guoyu Tao; Jami S Leichliter; Thomas L Gift; Karen W Hoover
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 9.308

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.