Literature DB >> 23970487

Understanding the vertical equity judgements underpinning health inequality measures.

Paul Allanson1, Dennis Petrie.   

Abstract

The choice of income-related health inequality measures in comparative studies is often determined by custom and analytical concerns, without much explicit consideration of the vertical equity judgements underlying alternative measures. This note employs an inequality map to illustrate how these judgements determine the ranking of populations by health inequality. In particular, it is shown that relative indices of inequality in health attainments and shortfalls embody distinct vertical equity judgments, where each may represent ethically defensible positions in specific contexts. Further research is needed to explore people's preferences over distributions of income and health.
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  health inequality; inequality equivalence criterion; inequality maps; vertical equity judgements

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23970487     DOI: 10.1002/hec.2984

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Econ        ISSN: 1057-9230            Impact factor:   3.046


  2 in total

1.  Lies, Damned Lies, and Health Inequality Measurements: Understanding the Value Judgments.

Authors:  Gustav Kjellsson; Ulf-G Gerdtham; Dennis Petrie
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.822

2.  Socioeconomic Status and Health: A New Approach to the Measurement of Bivariate Inequality.

Authors:  Guido Erreygers; Roselinde Kessels
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.