Literature DB >> 23970337

Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements for glaucoma detection: GDx ECC versus spectral-domain OCT.

Francesca Bertuzzi1, Eleonora Benatti, Giulia Esempio, Eliana Rulli, Stefano Miglior.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To assess the ability of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness measurements obtained using GDx-enhanced corneal compensation (ECC) or spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (RTVue), and that of ganglion cell complex (GCC) scan available on RTVue, to detect glaucoma.
METHODS: One randomly selected eye of 205 subjects (70 normal, 65 ocular hypertension, and 70 glaucoma) underwent a complete clinical and instrumental examination. RTVue spectral-domain optical coherence tomography was used to assess RNFL thickness and GCC parameters, GDx ECC to assess RNFL thickness. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) and sensitivity of the RNFL and GCC parameters were calculated at a fixed specificity of 95%, and the diagnostic abilities of the RNFL values obtained using the 2 instruments were compared. We also compared the results obtained in the normal, ocular hypertensive, and glaucomatous subjects.
RESULTS: Best GDx RNFL parameter was nerve fiber indicator (NFI) (AUC 0.99, sensitivity 96%); the best RTVue parameters were average (AUC 0.98, sensitivity 90%), inferior-temporal (AUC 0.97, sensitivity 89%), and superior-temporal RNFL thickness (AUC 0.96, sensitivity 87%). There were no significant differences between the 2 devices (P>0.05). Best GCC parameters were focal loss volume (AUC 0.98, sensitivity 91%) and global loss volume (AUC 0.96, sensitivity 87%).
CONCLUSIONS: GDx ECC and RTVue show a very good diagnostic ability to detect glaucoma. Most of the RNFL parameters had high AUCs and sensitivities. The diagnostic validity of GCC was comparable with that of the RNFL parameters, and they may be very useful in detecting RNFL damage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 23970337     DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3182741afc

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Glaucoma        ISSN: 1057-0829            Impact factor:   2.503


  6 in total

1.  Measurements of OCT Angiography Complement OCT for Diagnosing Early Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma.

Authors:  Alireza Kamalipour; Sasan Moghimi; Cris Martin Jacoba; Adeleh Yarmohammadi; Kaileen Yeh; James A Proudfoot; Huiyuan Hou; Takashi Nishida; Ryan Caezar David; Jasmin Rezapour; Nevin El-Nimri; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  Ophthalmol Glaucoma       Date:  2021-10-09

Review 2.  Optic nerve head and fibre layer imaging for diagnosing glaucoma.

Authors:  Manuele Michelessi; Ersilia Lucenteforte; Francesco Oddone; Miriam Brazzelli; Mariacristina Parravano; Sara Franchi; Sueko M Ng; Gianni Virgili
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-11-30

3.  Evaluation of spectral domain optical coherence tomography parameters in ocular hypertension, preperimetric, and early glaucoma.

Authors:  Tuğba Aydogan; BetÜl İlkay Sezgin Akçay; Esra Kardeş; Ahmet Ergin
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.848

4.  Optical coherence tomography for glaucoma diagnosis: An evidence based meta-analysis.

Authors:  Vinay Kansal; James J Armstrong; Robert Pintwala; Cindy Hutnik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Follow-up of the retinal nerve fiber layer thickness of diabetic patients type 2, as a predisposing factor for glaucoma compared to normal subjects.

Authors:  Alexandros Takis; Dimitrios Alonistiotis; Nikolaos Ioannou; Evgenia Kontou; Maria Mitsopoulou; Dimitrios Papaconstantinou
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-06-13

6.  Foveal Phase Retardation Correlates With Optically Measured Henle Fiber Layer Thickness.

Authors:  Phillip T Yuhas; Marisa L Ciamacca; Keith A Ramsey; Danielle M Mayne; Elizabeth A Stern-Green; Matthew Ohr; Aaron Zimmerman; Andrew T E Hartwick; Dean A VanNasdale
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-04-15
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.