Literature DB >> 23970106

Lumbar disc nomenclature: version 2.0: recommendations of the combined task forces of the North American Spine Society, the American Society of Spine Radiology, and the American Society of Neuroradiology.

David F Fardon1, Alan L Williams, Edward J Dohring, F Reed Murtagh, Stephen L Gabriel Rothman, Gordon K Sze.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: This article comprises a review of the literature pertaining to the normal and pathological lumbar disc and the compilation of a standardized nomenclature.
OBJECTIVE: To provide a resource that promotes a clear understanding of lumbar disc terminology among clinicians, radiologists, and researchers. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The article "Nomenclature and Classification of Lumbar Disc Pathology. Recommendations of the Combined Task Forces of the North American Spine Society, American Society of Spine Radiology and American Society of Neuroradiology" was published in 2001 in Spine © Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins and formally endorsed by the 3 boards. Its purpose, which it served for well over a decade, was to promote greater clarity and consistency of usage of spine terminology. Since 2001, there has been sufficient evolution in our understanding of the lumbar disc to suggest the need for revision and updating. The document represents the consensus recommendations of the current combined task forces and reflects changes consistent with current concepts in radiological and clinical care.
METHODS: A PubMed search was performed for literature pertaining to the lumbar disc. The task force members individually and collectively reviewed the literature and revised the 2001 document. It was then reviewed by the governing boards of the American Society of Spine Radiology, the American Society of Neuroradiology, and the North American Spine Society. After further revision based on their feedback, the paper was approved for publication.
RESULTS: The article provides a discussion of the recommended diagnostic categories and a glossary of terms pertaining to the lumbar disc, a detailed discussion of the terms and their recommended usage, as well as updated illustrations and literature references.
CONCLUSION: We have revised and updated a document that, since 2001, has provided a widely accepted nomenclature that helps maintain consistency and accuracy in the description of the properties of the normal and abnormal lumbar discs and that serves as a system for classification and reporting built upon that nomenclature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 23970106     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a8866d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  18 in total

1.  The prevalence of degenerative or incidental findings in the lumbar spine of pediatric patients: a study using magnetic resonance imaging as a screening tool.

Authors:  Julio Urrutia; Tomas Zamora; Carlos Prada
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar intervertebral discs.

Authors:  Dosik Hwang; Sewon Kim; Nirusha A Abeydeera; Sheronda Statum; Koichi Masuda; Christine B Chung; Palanan Siriwanarangsun; Won C Bae
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2016-12

3.  Validation of multisociety combined task force definitions of abnormal disk morphology.

Authors:  C H Cho; L Hsu; M L Ferrone; D A Leonard; M B Harris; A A Zamani; C M Bono
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Disc and nerve root findings on lumbar MRI with straightened v s flexed hips and knees-pilot study.

Authors:  Ansgar Espeland; Nina Dalen
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Sonoelastographic evaluation of the sciatic nerve in patients with unilateral lumbar disc herniation.

Authors:  Umut Orkun Çelebi; Veysel Burulday; Mehmet Faik Özveren; Adil Doğan; Mehmet Hüseyin Akgül
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2018-07-07       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Association between MRI findings and clinical outcomes in a period of 5 years after lumbar spine microdiscectomy.

Authors:  Evangelos I Papanastasiou; Daphne J Theodorou; Stavroula J Theodorou; Emilios E Pakos; Avraam Ploumis; Anastasios V Korompilias; Ioannis D Gelalis
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-11-02

7.  We Need to Talk about Lumbar Total Disc Replacement.

Authors:  Stephen Beatty
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-08-03

8.  Serum levels of the proinflammatory cytokine interleukin-6 vary based on diagnoses in individuals with lumbar intervertebral disc diseases.

Authors:  Kathryn T Weber; D Olivier Alipui; Cristina P Sison; Ona Bloom; Shaheda Quraishi; M Chris Overby; Mitchell Levine; Nadeen O Chahine
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 5.156

9.  Progression of lumbar disc herniations over an eight-year period in a group of adult Danes from the general population--a longitudinal MRI study using quantitative measures.

Authors:  Per Kjaer; Andreas Tunset; Eleanor Boyle; Tue Secher Jensen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Identification of lumbar disc disease hallmarks: a large cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Jun Zhang; Fei Zhao; Feng-Liang Wang; Yong-Feng Yang; Chen Zhang; Yue Cao; You-Lin Wang; Xiao-Juan Shi; Yi Wan; Min Zhang; Meng-Qiao Liu; Chun-Guang Zuo; Hai-Qiang Wang
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-11-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.