Literature DB >> 23969801

Enhanced recovery in gynecologic surgery.

Eleftheria Kalogera1, Jamie N Bakkum-Gamez, Christopher J Jankowski, Emanuel Trabuco, Jenna K Lovely, Sarah Dhanorker, Pamela L Grubbs, Amy L Weaver, Lindsey R Haas, Bijan J Borah, April A Bursiek, Michael T Walsh, William A Cliby, Sean C Dowdy.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of enhanced recovery (a multimodal perioperative care enhancement protocol) in patients undergoing gynecologic surgery.
METHODS: Consecutive patients managed under an enhanced recovery pathway and undergoing cytoreduction, surgical staging, or pelvic organ prolapse surgery between June 20, 2011, and December 20, 2011, were compared with consecutive historical controls (March to December 2010) matched by procedure. Wilcoxon rank-sum, χ, and Fisher's exact tests were used for comparisons. Direct medical costs incurred in the first 30 days were obtained from the Olmsted County Healthcare Expenditure and Utilization Database and standardized to 2011 Medicare dollars.
RESULTS: A total of 241 enhanced recovery women in the case group (81 cytoreduction, 84 staging, and 76 vaginal surgery) were compared with women in the control groups. In the cytoreductive group, patient-controlled anesthesia use decreased from 98.7% to 33.3% and overall opioid use decreased by 80% in the first 48 hours with no change in pain scores. Enhanced recovery resulted in a 4-day reduction in hospital stay with stable readmission rates (25.9% of women in the case group compared with 17.9% of women in the control group) and 30-day cost savings of more than $7,600 per patient (18.8% reduction). No differences were observed in rate (63% compared with 71.8%) or severity of postoperative complications (grade 3 or more: 21% compared with 20.5%). Similar, albeit less dramatic, improvements were observed in the other two cohorts. Ninety-five percent of patients rated satisfaction with perioperative care as excellent or very good.
CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of enhanced recovery was associated with acceptable pain management with reduced opioids, reduced length of stay with stable readmission and morbidity rates, good patient satisfaction, and substantial cost reductions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23969801      PMCID: PMC3913481          DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31829aa780

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  34 in total

Review 1.  A meta-analysis of fast track surgery for patients with gastric cancer undergoing gastrectomy.

Authors:  S Chen; Z Zou; F Chen; Z Huang; G Li
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 2.  Perioperative pain management strategies among women having reproductive surgeries.

Authors:  Malavika Prabhu; Pietro Bortoletto; Brian T Bateman
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2017-07-08       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 3.  Review of enhanced recovery programs in benign gynecologic surgery.

Authors:  Elisa R Trowbridge; Caitlin N Dreisbach; Bethany M Sarosiek; Catherine Page Dunbar; Sarah Larkin Evans; Lee Anne Hahn; Kathie L Hullfish
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  30-Day unanticipated healthcare encounters after prolapse surgery: impact of same day discharge.

Authors:  Anna L Romanova; Charelle Carter-Brooks; Kristine M Ruppert; Halina M Zyczynski
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 5.  The implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols in ovarian malignancy surgery.

Authors:  Joseph J Noh; Myeong-Seon Kim; Yoo-Young Lee
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-03

6.  Risk factors and indications for 30-day readmission after primary surgery for epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Mariam AlHilli; Carrie Langstraat; Christine Tran; Janice Martin; Amy Weaver; Michaela McGree; Andrea Mariani; William Cliby; Jamie Bakkum-Gamez
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.437

7.  Impact of implementation of an enhanced recovery program in gynecologic surgery on healthcare costs.

Authors:  Ross F Harrison; Yao Li; Alexis Guzman; Brandelyn Pitcher; Andrea Rodriguez-Restrepo; Katherine E Cain; Maria D Iniesta; Javier D Lasala; Pedro T Ramirez; Larissa A Meyer
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 8.  Enhanced Recovery Pathways in Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology.

Authors:  Emma L Barber; Linda Van Le
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Surv       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.347

9.  Optimizing Blood Transfusion Practices Through Bundled Intervention Implementation in Patients With Gynecologic Cancer Undergoing Laparotomy.

Authors:  Sumer K Wallace; Jessica W Halverson; Christopher J Jankowski; Stephanie R DeJong; Amy L Weaver; Megan R Weinhold; Bijan J Borah; James P Moriarty; William A Cliby; Daryl J Kor; Andrew A Higgins; Hilary A Otto; Sean C Dowdy; Jamie N Bakkum-Gamez
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Enhanced recovery for obese patients undergoing gynecologic cancer surgery.

Authors:  Ross Harrison; Maria D Iniesta; Brandelyn Pitcher; Pedro T Ramirez; Katherine Cain; Ashley M Siverand; Gabriel Mena; Javier Lasala; Larissa A Meyer
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 3.437

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.