Literature DB >> 23969589

Reasons for not prescribing guideline-recommended medications to adults with heart failure.

Michael A Steinman1, Liezel Dimaano, Carolyn A Peterson, Paul A Heidenreich, Sara J Knight, Kathy Z Fung, Peter J Kaboli.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little is known about how often contextual factors such as patient preferences and competing priorities impact prescribing of guideline-recommended medications, or about the extent to which these factors are documented in medical records and available to performance measurement systems.
METHODS: Mixed-methods study of 295 veterans aged 50 years and older in 4 VA health care systems who had systolic heart failure and were not prescribed a β-blocker and/or an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin-receptor blocker. Reasons for nontreatment were identified from clinic notes and from interviews with 62 primary care clinicians caring for these patients. These reasons were classified using a published taxonomy.
RESULTS: Among 295 patients not receiving guideline-recommended drugs for heart failure, chart review identified biomedical reasons for nonprescribing in 42%-58% of patients and contextual reasons in 11%-17%. Clinician interviews identified twice as many reasons for nonprescribing as chart review (mean 1.6 vs. 0.8 reasons per patient, P<0.001). In these interviews, biomedical reasons for nonprescribing were cited in 50%-70% of patients, and contextual reasons in 64%-70%. The most common contextual reasons were comanagement with other clinicians (32%-35% of patients), patient preferences and nonadherence (15%-24%), and clinician belief that the medication is not indicated in the patient (12%-20%).
CONCLUSIONS: Contextual reasons for not prescribing angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor / angiotensin-receptor blockers and β-blockers are present in two thirds of patients with heart failure who did not receive these medications, yet are poorly documented in medical records. The structure of medical records should be improved to facilitate documentation of contextual reasons for not providing guideline-recommended care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23969589      PMCID: PMC3806480          DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182a3e525

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  29 in total

1.  Effect of the transformation of the Veterans Affairs Health Care System on the quality of care.

Authors:  Ashish K Jha; Jonathan B Perlin; Kenneth W Kizer; R Adams Dudley
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-05-29       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Barriers to accurate diagnosis and effective management of heart failure in primary care: qualitative study.

Authors:  Ahmet Fuat; A Pali S Hungin; Jeremy James Murphy
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-01-25

3.  Barriers to diagnosing and managing heart failure in primary care.

Authors:  Susan M Phillips; Richard L Marton; Geoffrey H Tofler
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2004-07-19       Impact factor: 7.738

4.  Monitoring performance for blood pressure management among patients with diabetes mellitus: too much of a good thing?

Authors:  Eve A Kerr; Michelle A Lucatorto; Rob Holleman; Mary M Hogan; Mandi L Klamerus; Timothy P Hofer
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2012-06-25

Review 5.  Interventions to improve adherence to self-administered medications for chronic diseases in the United States: a systematic review.

Authors:  Meera Viswanathan; Carol E Golin; Christine D Jones; Mahima Ashok; Susan J Blalock; Roberta C M Wines; Emmanuel J L Coker-Schwimmer; David L Rosen; Priyanka Sista; Kathleen N Lohr
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Avoiding pitfalls in chronic disease quality measurement: a case for the next generation of technical quality measures.

Authors:  E A Kerr; S L Krein; S Vijan; T P Hofer; R A Hayward
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.229

7.  The long-term effect of premier pay for performance on patient outcomes.

Authors:  Ashish K Jha; Karen E Joynt; E John Orav; Arnold M Epstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Building a better quality measure: are some patients with 'poor quality' actually getting good care?

Authors:  Eve A Kerr; Dylan M Smith; Mary M Hogan; Timothy P Hofer; Sarah L Krein; Martin Bermann; Rodney A Hayward
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Quality of heart failure care in managed Medicare and Medicaid patients in North Carolina.

Authors:  Alain G Bertoni; Vanessa Duren-Winfield; Walter T Ambrosius; Jill McArdle; Carla A Sueta; Mark W Massing; Sharon Peacock; Jennifer Davis; Janet B Croft; David C Goff
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2004-03-15       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Exempting dissenting patients from pay for performance schemes: retrospective analysis of exception reporting in the UK Quality and Outcomes Framework.

Authors:  Tim Doran; Evangelos Kontopantelis; Catherine Fullwood; Helen Lester; Jose M Valderas; Stephen Campbell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-04-17
View more
  13 in total

1.  Medication Initiation Burden Required to Comply With Heart Failure Guideline Recommendations and Hospital Quality Measures.

Authors:  Larry A Allen; Gregg C Fonarow; Li Liang; Phillip J Schulte; Frederick A Masoudi; John S Rumsfeld; P Michael Ho; Zubin J Eapen; Adrian F Hernandez; Paul A Heidenreich; Deepak L Bhatt; Eric D Peterson; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Guideline-led prescribing to ambulatory heart failure patients in a cardiology outpatient service.

Authors:  Seif El Hadidi; Carl Vaughan; David Kerins; Stephen Byrne; Ebtissam Darweesh; Margaret Bermingham
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2021-01-07

3.  The Challenges of Measuring, Improving, and Reporting Quality in Primary Care.

Authors:  Richard A Young; Richard G Roberts; Richard J Holden
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 5.166

4.  Association of β-Blockers With Functional Outcomes, Death, and Rehospitalization in Older Nursing Home Residents After Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Michael A Steinman; Andrew R Zullo; Yoojin Lee; Lori A Daiello; W John Boscardin; David D Dore; Siqi Gan; Kathy Fung; Sei J Lee; Kiya D R Komaiko; Vincent Mor
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 21.873

5.  How to best assess quality of drug treatment in patients with heart failure.

Authors:  Ramin Zarrinkoub; Thomas Kahan; Sven-Erik Johansson; Per Wändell; Märit Mejhert; Björn Wettermark
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 2.953

6.  Compliance with clinical pathways for inpatient care in Chinese public hospitals.

Authors:  Xiao Yan He; M Kate Bundorf; Jian Jun Gu; Ping Zhou; Di Xue
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  "Salt in the Wound": Safety Net Clinician Perspectives on Performance Feedback Derived From EHR Data.

Authors:  Arwen E Bunce; Rachel Gold; James V Davis; MaryBeth Mercer; Victoria Jaworski; Celine Hollombe; Christine Nelson
Journal:  J Ambul Care Manage       Date:  2017 Jan/Mar

8.  Temporal Trends and Hospital Variation in Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist Use in Veterans Discharged With Heart Failure.

Authors:  Sandesh Dev; Mary E Lacy; Frederick A Masoudi; Wen-Chih Wu
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 5.501

9.  Assessing Nephrological Competence among Geriatricians: A Proof of Concept Internet Survey.

Authors:  Raffaele Antonelli Incalzi; Filippo Aucella; Dario Leosco; Giuliano Brunori; Michela Dalmartello; Giuseppe Paolisso
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Barriers to Adoption of Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists in Patients With Heart Failure: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Authors:  Sandesh Dev; Trisha K Hoffman; Dio Kavalieratos; Paul Heidenreich; Wen-Chih Wu; Dawn C Schwenke; Sarah J Tracy
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 5.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.