Literature DB >> 23969269

Pressure to produce=pressure to reduce accident reporting?

Tahira M Probst1, Maja Graso.   

Abstract

Each year, more than 4 million U.S. workers are injured on the job - several thousand die (Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2008). Despite these staggering numbers, research suggests that they are gross underestimates of the true volume of workplace related illnesses and injuries due to accident under-reporting. Although accident under-reporting has been well-documented, less is known regarding why this occurs. The current study suggests that under-reporting may in part be due to high levels of perceived production pressure. Specifically, this study tested the hypotheses that production pressure would be related to more experienced accidents overall and more negative attitudes toward reporting accidents. Further, we expected that production pressure would exacerbate the under-reporting of accidents. Survey data were collected from a sample of 212 copper mining workers located in the southwestern United States. The survey measured employee perceptions regarding production pressure, attitudes toward reporting accidents, perceived consequences of reporting accidents, and actual reporting behaviors (e.g., types and numbers of accidents experienced vs. reported). As predicted, the average number of experienced accidents per employee was significantly higher (M=2.84) than the number of reported accidents (M=.49). In addition, production pressure was related to more negative reporting attitudes. Individuals who had positive reporting attitudes were injured less frequently; however, when an incident occurred, they were more likely to report it. Finally, higher levels of production pressure were related to greater accident under-reporting. Additionally, employees who perceived high levels of production pressure not only experienced more accidents overall, they also reported fewer of them to the organization. Implications for occupational safety initiatives--particularly in the current economic climate--are discussed, as are methodological challenges of conducting research in this area.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accident reporting; Production pressure; Workplace safety

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23969269     DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.07.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Accid Anal Prev        ISSN: 0001-4575


  4 in total

1.  Multilevel Job Demands and Resources: Cross-level Effects of Competing Organizational Facet-Specific Climates on Risky Safety Behaviors.

Authors:  Valerio Ghezzi; Tahira M Probst; Laura Petitta; Claudio Barbaranelli
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-05-17       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  When Ethics is a Technical Matter: Engineers' Strategic Appeal to Ethical Considerations in Advocating for System Integrity.

Authors:  Sarah Maslen; Jan Hayes; Sarah Holdsworth; Orana Sandri
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Understanding the hospital sharps injury reporting pathway.

Authors:  Leslie I Boden; Yolanta V Petrofsky; Karen Hopcia; Gregory R Wagner; Dean Hashimoto
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 2.214

4.  Can Survey Measures Predict Key Performance Indicators of Safety? Confirmatory and Exploratory Analyses of the Association Between Self-Report and Safety Outcomes in the Maritime Industry.

Authors:  Line Raknes Hjellvik; Bjørn Sætrevik
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-05-29
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.