Literature DB >> 23969263

Diffusion tensor imaging of the cervical spinal cord in healthy adult population: normative values and measurement reproducibility at 3T MRI.

Antti Brander1, Eerika Koskinen, Teemu M Luoto, Ullamari Hakulinen, Mika Helminen, Sirpa Savilahti, Pertti Ryymin, Prasun Dastidar, Juha Ohman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Compared to diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) of the brain, there is a paucity of reports addressing the applicability of DTI in the evaluation of the spinal cord. Most normative data of cervical spinal cord DTI consist of relatively small and arbitrarily collected populations. Comprehensive normative data are necessary for clinical decision-making.
PURPOSE: To establish normal values for cervical spinal cord DTI metrics with region of interest (ROI)- and fiber tractography (FT)-based measurements and to assess the reproducibility of both measurement methods.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty healthy adults underwent cervical spinal cord 3T MRI. Sagittal and axial conventional T2 sequences and DTI in the axial plane were performed. Whole cord fractional anisotropy (FA) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were determined at different cervical levels from C2 to C7 using the ROI method. DTI metrics (FA, axial, and radial diffusivities based on eigenvalues λ1, λ2, and λ3, and ADC) of the lateral and posterior funicles were measured at C3 level. FA and ADC of the whole cord and the lateral and posterior funicles were also measured using quantitative tractography. Intra- and inter-observer variation of the measurement methods were assessed.
RESULTS: Whole cord FA values decreased and ADC values increased in the rostral to caudal direction from C2 to C7. Between the individual white matter funicles no statistically significant difference for FA or ADC values was found. Both axial diffusivity and radial diffusivity of both lateral funicles differed significantly from those of the posterior funicle. Neither gender nor age correlated with any of the DTI metrics. Intra-observer variation of the measurements for whole cord FA and ADC showed almost perfect agreement with both ROI and tractography-based measurements. There was more variation in measurements of individual columns. Inter-observer agreement varied from moderate to strong for whole cord FA and ADC.
CONCLUSION: Both ROI- and FT-based measurements are applicable methods yielding reproducible results for cervical spinal cord DTI metrics. Normative values for both measurement methods are presented.

Keywords:  CNS; MR diffusion/perfusion; adults; normal variants; spinal cord; tissue characterization

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23969263     DOI: 10.1177/0284185113499752

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Radiol        ISSN: 0284-1851            Impact factor:   1.990


  8 in total

1.  Normal values of cervical spinal cord diffusion tensor in young and middle-aged healthy Chinese.

Authors:  Tin-Yan Chan; Xiang Li; Kin-Cheung Mak; Jason Pui-yin Cheung; Keith Dip-Kei Luk; Yong Hu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-25       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Analysis of the diffusion tensor imaging parameters of a normal cervical spinal cord in a healthy population.

Authors:  Liang-Feng Wei; Shou-Sen Wang; Zhao-Cong Zheng; Jun Tian; Liang Xue
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 1.985

3.  Diffusion Tensor Imaging of the Normal Cervical and Thoracic Pediatric Spinal Cord.

Authors:  S Saksena; D M Middleton; L Krisa; P Shah; S H Faro; R Sinko; J Gaughan; J Finsterbusch; M J Mulcahey; F B Mohamed
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Cervical Spinal Cord DTI Is Improved by Reduced FOV with Specific Balance between the Number of Diffusion Gradient Directions and Averages.

Authors:  A Crombe; N Alberti; B Hiba; M Uettwiller; V Dousset; T Tourdias
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Diffusion tensor imaging in unclear intramedullary tumor-suspected lesions allows separating tumors from inflammation.

Authors:  Marc Hohenhaus; Yorn Merz; Jan-Helge Klingler; Christoph Scholz; Ulrich Hubbe; Jürgen Beck; Katharina Wolf; Karl Egger; Marco Reisert; Nico Kremers
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 2.473

6.  ZOOM or Non-ZOOM? Assessing Spinal Cord Diffusion Tensor Imaging Protocols for Multi-Centre Studies.

Authors:  Rebecca S Samson; Simon Lévy; Torben Schneider; Alex K Smith; Seth A Smith; Julien Cohen-Adad; Claudia A M Gandini Wheeler-Kingshott
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Reliability of pre-operative diffusion tensor imaging parameter measurements of the cervical spine in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Eugene Lee; Joon Woo Lee; Yun Jung Bae; Hyo Jin Kim; Yusuhn Kang; Joong Mo Ahn
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Magnetic-Resonance Diffusion-Tensor Tractography in the Diagnosis of Tumefactive Spinal-Cord Lesions in Neuromyelitis Optica.

Authors:  Yung Hsu; Ming-Chung Chou; Poh-Shiow Yeh; Te-Chang Wu; Ching-Chung Ko; Tai-Yuan Chen
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-12
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.