Literature DB >> 23969113

A prospective, randomized, controlled trial of the efficacy and safety of fibrin pad as an adjunct to control soft tissue bleeding during abdominal, retroperitoneal, pelvic, and thoracic surgery.

Craig P Fischer1, Grant Bochicchio, Jessica Shen, Bababhai Patel, Jonathan Batiller, James C Hart.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the hemostatic effectiveness and safety of Fibrin Pad (Omrix Biopharmaceuticals Ltd.) vs absorbable hemostat in patients undergoing nonemergent surgery. Fibrin Pad is a topical absorbable hemostat designed to be effective in a variety of soft tissues and across multiple bleeding intensities. STUDY
DESIGN: Patients 18 years and older, requiring abdominal, retroperitoneal, pelvic, or thoracic (noncardiac) surgery and with an appropriate soft-tissue target bleeding site (TBS), were randomized to receive Fibrin Pad or absorbable hemostat (NCT00658723). Patients were stratified by bleeding severity at the TBS. Assessments included percentage of patients achieving hemostasis at 4 minutes after randomization with no rebleeding requiring treatment during the subsequent 6 minutes (primary endpoint), proportion of patients achieving hemostasis at 10 minutes, and incidence of treatment failure.
RESULTS: On the primary endpoint, 98.3% of patients with Fibrin Pad and 53.3% with absorbable hemostat achieved hemostasis at 4 minutes (p < 0.0001). The treatment differential was magnified (efficacy was maintained with Fibrin Pad but decreased with absorbable hemostat) with increasing bleeding intensity: in patients with mild bleeding, 100.0% vs 80.0% achieved hemostasis with Fibrin Pad and absorbable hemostat (p = 0.03), respectively; rates were 96.6% vs 26.7%, respectively (p < 0.0001) with moderate bleeding. Percentages of patients who achieved hemostasis at 10 minutes were: Fibrin Pad, 98.3% and absorbable hemostat, 73.3% (p < 0.0001). Incidences of adverse events were comparable between groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Fibrin Pad is superior to absorbable hemostat (SURGICEL Original Absorbable Hemostat [Ethicon]) in soft-tissue bleeding control and is safe and effective as an adjunct for rapidly and reliably achieving hemostasis for soft-tissue bleeding during surgery.
Copyright © 2013 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AE; ITT; TBS; adverse event; intention to treat; target bleeding site

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23969113     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.02.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  16 in total

1.  Safety and Hemostatic Effectiveness of the Fibrin Pad for Severe Soft-Tissue Bleeding During Abdominal, Retroperitoneal, Pelvic, and Thoracic (Non-cardiac) Surgery: A Randomized, Controlled, Superiority Trial.

Authors:  Jonathan Koea; Peter Baldwin; Jessica Shen; B Patel; Jonathan Batiller; Axel Arnaud; James Hart; Jeffrey Hammond; Craig Fischer; O James Garden
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Topical hemostasis in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  R Vecchio; R Catalano; F Basile; C Spataro; M Caputo; E Intagliata
Journal:  G Chir       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec

Review 3.  Use of local pro-coagulant haemostatic agents for intra-cavity control of haemorrhage after trauma.

Authors:  A Navarro; A Brooks
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 3.693

4.  A phase III, randomized, controlled, superiority trial evaluating the fibrin pad versus standard of care in controlling parenchymal bleeding during elective hepatic surgery.

Authors:  Jonathan B Koea; Jonathan Batiller; Babahai Patel; Jessica Shen; Jeffrey Hammond; James Hart; Craig Fischer; O James Garden
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 3.647

5.  A multicentre, prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing EVARREST™ fibrin sealant patch to standard of care in controlling bleeding following elective hepatectomy: anatomic versus non-anatomic resection.

Authors:  Jonathan B Koea; Jonathan Batiller; Nicolas Aguirre; Jessica Shen; Richard Kocharian; Grant Bochicchio; O James Garden
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 3.647

6.  A Prospective, Randomized, Phase III Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Fibrin Sealant Grifols as an Adjunct to Hemostasis as Compared to Cellulose Sheets in Hepatic Surgery Resections.

Authors:  Miloš Bjelović; Jaume Ayguasanosa; Robin D Kim; Miroslav Stojanović; András Vereczkei; Srdjan Nikolić; Emily Winslow; Sukru Emre; Gary Xiao; Jordi Navarro-Puerto; Kecia Courtney; Gladis Barrera
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Safety and effectiveness of a synthetic hemostatic patch for intraoperative soft tissue bleeding.

Authors:  Christoph Schuhmacher; Johann Pratschke; Sascha Weiss; Stefan Schneeberger; André L Mihaljevic; Rebekka Schirren; Michael Winkler; Nikos Emmanouilidis
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2015-03-31

8.  Health and economic outcomes associated with uncontrolled surgical bleeding: a retrospective analysis of the Premier Perspectives Database.

Authors:  Mitra Corral; Nicole Ferko; Sarah Hollmann; Michael S Broder; Eunice Chang
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2015-07-22

Review 9.  Control of bleeding in surgical procedures: critical appraisal of HEMOPATCH (Sealing Hemostat).

Authors:  Kevin Michael Lewis; Carl Erik Kuntze; Heinz Gulle
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2015-12-22

10.  Variation in hospital resource use and cost among surgical procedures using topical absorbable hemostats.

Authors:  Derek Martyn; Lisa M Meckley; Gavin Miyasato; Sangtaeck Lim; Jerome B Riebman; Richard Kocharian; Jillian G Scaife; Yajing Rao; Mitra Corral
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2015-11-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.