John W Toumbourou1, M Elizabeth Douglas Gregg, Alison L Shortt, Delyse M Hutchinson, Tania M Slaviero. 1. Prevention Sciences, School of Psychology and Centre for Mental Health and Wellbeing Research, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia; Centre for Adolescent Health, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia. Electronic address: john.toumbourou@deakin.edu.au.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Two-year longitudinal follow-up data evaluated the behavioral impact of Resilient Families, a universal intervention that aimed to prevent early initiation and frequent and heavy adolescent alcohol use in secondary schools in Melbourne, Australia. METHODS:Of 24 secondary schools (62% of those approached), 12 were randomly assigned to intervention and 12 as controls. Intervention students received a social relationship curriculum; their parents received parent education handbooks and invitations to parent education events outlining strategies to encourage healthy adolescent development and reduce adolescent alcohol misuse. At Wave 1 (2004), students were in Year 7 secondary school (mean age, 12.3 years). Data were imputed for students completing at least two of three annual surveys (N = 2,354). Wave 3 (2006; mean, 14.5 years) main outcome measures for alcohol use were "any," "frequent" (at least monthly), and "heavy" (five or more drinks in a session at least once in the prior fortnight). Multivariate logistic regression assessed intervention exposure effects, adjusting for school classroom clustering and baseline measures. RESULTS: Relative to controls, intervention students showed significant reductions in any lifetime use (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], .78; 95% confidence interval [CI], .62-.97), and reduced progression to frequent (AOR, .69; CI, .56-.86) and heavy use (AOR, .75; CI, .60-.94). CONCLUSIONS: Randomized assignment to Resilient Families was associated with a significant reduction in adolescent alcohol use among families volunteering for the evaluation. Family-school-based interventions appear promising as a strategy to contribute to population reductions in currently high rates of adolescent alcohol misuse.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: Two-year longitudinal follow-up data evaluated the behavioral impact of Resilient Families, a universal intervention that aimed to prevent early initiation and frequent and heavy adolescent alcohol use in secondary schools in Melbourne, Australia. METHODS: Of 24 secondary schools (62% of those approached), 12 were randomly assigned to intervention and 12 as controls. Intervention students received a social relationship curriculum; their parents received parent education handbooks and invitations to parent education events outlining strategies to encourage healthy adolescent development and reduce adolescent alcohol misuse. At Wave 1 (2004), students were in Year 7 secondary school (mean age, 12.3 years). Data were imputed for students completing at least two of three annual surveys (N = 2,354). Wave 3 (2006; mean, 14.5 years) main outcome measures for alcohol use were "any," "frequent" (at least monthly), and "heavy" (five or more drinks in a session at least once in the prior fortnight). Multivariate logistic regression assessed intervention exposure effects, adjusting for school classroom clustering and baseline measures. RESULTS: Relative to controls, intervention students showed significant reductions in any lifetime use (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], .78; 95% confidence interval [CI], .62-.97), and reduced progression to frequent (AOR, .69; CI, .56-.86) and heavy use (AOR, .75; CI, .60-.94). CONCLUSIONS: Randomized assignment to Resilient Families was associated with a significant reduction in adolescent alcohol use among families volunteering for the evaluation. Family-school-based interventions appear promising as a strategy to contribute to population reductions in currently high rates of adolescent alcohol misuse.
Authors: Louise K Thornton; Cath Chapman; Dana Leidl; Chloe Conroy; Maree Teesson; Tim Slade; Ina Koning; Katrina Champion; Lexine Stapinski; Nicola Newton Journal: Internet Interv Date: 2018-03-24
Authors: Rebecca Kate Hodder; Megan Freund; Jenny Bowman; Luke Wolfenden; Elizabeth Campbell; Julia Dray; Christophe Lecathelinais; Christopher Oldmeadow; John Attia; John Wiggers Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2017-08-18 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Frances L Doyle; Alina Morawska; Daryl J Higgins; Sophie S Havighurst; Trevor G Mazzucchelli; John W Toumbourou; Christel M Middeldorp; Carys Chainey; Vanessa E Cobham; Paul Harnett; Matthew R Sanders Journal: Child Psychiatry Hum Dev Date: 2022-01-06
Authors: Dongchun Tang; Weicong Cai; Wenda Yang; Shangmin Chen; Liping Li Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-03-29 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: J Derges; J Kidger; F Fox; R Campbell; E Kaner; G Taylor; C McMahon; L Reeves; M Hickman Journal: J Public Health (Oxf) Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 2.341