Literature DB >> 23968763

Preoperative beta-blocker use should not be a quality metric for coronary artery bypass grafting.

Damien J LaPar1, Ivan K Crosby, Irving L Kron, John A Kern, Edwin Fonner, Jeffrey B Rich, Alan M Speir, Gorav Ailawadi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preoperative beta-blockade for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has become an accepted hospital quality metric. However, single-institution reports regarding the benefits of beta-blocker (ß-blocker) use are conflicting. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the associations between preoperative beta-blocker use and outcomes within a large, regional cohort.
METHODS: Patient records from a statewide, multi-institutional Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) certified database for isolated CABG operations (2001 to 2011) were extracted and stratified by preoperative ß-blocker use. The influence of preoperative ß-blockers on risk-adjusted outcomes was assessed by hierarchical regression modeling with adjustment for preoperative risk using calculated STS predictive risk indices.
RESULTS: A total of 43,747 (age, 63 years; ß-blocker 80% versus non ß-blocker 20%) patients were included. Median STS predicted risk of mortality scores for ß-blocker patients were incrementally lower (1.2% vs 1.4%, p < 0.001). Non ß-blocker patients more frequently developed pneumonia (3.5% vs 2.8%, p = 0.001), while ß-blocker patients surprisingly had greater intraoperative blood usage (16% vs 11%, p < 0.001). There was no difference in unadjusted mortality (ß-blocker: 1.9% vs non ß-blocker: 2.2%, p = 0.15). After risk adjustment, preoperative ß-blocker use was not associated with mortality (p = 0.63), morbidity, length of stay (p = 0.79), or hospital readmission (p = 0.97).
CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative ß-blocker use is not associated with risk-adjusted mortality, several measures of morbidity, or hospital resource utilization after CABG operations. Thus, these data suggest that the routine use of preoperative ß-blockers for CABG operations should not be used as a measure of surgical quality.
Copyright © 2013 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  23

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23968763     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.05.059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  5 in total

Review 1.  Contemporary personalized β-blocker management in the perioperative setting.

Authors:  Adriana D Oprea; Xiaoxiao Wang; Robert Sickeler; Miklos D Kertai
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  What can the national quality forum tell us about performance measurement in anesthesiology?

Authors:  Joseph A Hyder; Jonathan Niconchuk; Laurent G Glance; Mark D Neuman; Robert R Cima; Richard P Dutton; Louis L Nguyen; Lee A Fleisher; Angela M Bader
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 3.  Repair or replace for severe ischemic mitral regurgitation: prospective randomized multicenter data.

Authors:  Damien J LaPar; Michael A Acker; Annetine C Gelijns; Irving L Kron
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-09

4.  Efficacy of Long-Term β-Blocker Therapy for Secondary Prevention of Long-Term Outcomes After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery.

Authors:  Heng Zhang; Xin Yuan; Haibo Zhang; Sipeng Chen; Yan Zhao; Kun Hua; Chenfei Rao; Wei Wang; Hansong Sun; Shengshou Hu; Zhe Zheng
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Preoperative beta-blocker in ventricular dysfunction patients: need a more granular quality metric.

Authors:  Hanwei Tang; Kai Chen; Jianfeng Hou; Xiaohong Huang; Sheng Liu; Shengshou Hu
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 2.298

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.