Literature DB >> 23968756

Derivation of a clinical prediction rule for bloodstream infection mortality of patients visiting the emergency department based on predisposition, infection, response, and organ dysfunction concept.

Chun-Fu Yeh1, Kuan-Fu Chen2, Jung-Jr Ye1, Ching-Tai Huang3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/
PURPOSE: Bloodstream infection (BSI) is a serious infection with a high mortality. We aimed to construct a predictive scoring system to stratify the severity of patients with BSI visiting the emergency department (ED).
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study consisting of patients who visited the ED of a tertiary hospital with documented BSI in 2010. The potential predictors of mortality were obtained via chart review. Multivariate logistic regression was utilized to identify predictors of mortality. Penalized maximum likelihood estimation (PMLE) was applied for score development.
RESULTS: There were 1063 patients with bacteremia included, with an overall 28-day mortality rate of 13.2% (n = 140). In multiple logistic regression with penalization, the independent predictors of death were "predisposition": malignancy (β-coefficient, 0.65; +2 points); "infection": Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) bacteremia (0.69; +2 points), pneumonia (1.32; +4 points), and bacteremia with an unknown focus (0.70; +2 points); "response": body temperature <36 °C (1.17; +3 points), band form >5% (1.00; +3 points), and red blood cell distribution width (RDW) >15% (0.63; +2 points); and "organ dysfunction": pulse oximeter oxygen saturation <90% (0.72; +2 points) and creatinine >2 mg/dL (0.69; +2 points). The area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for the model was 0.881 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.848-0.913], with a better performance than the Pitt bacteremia score (AUROC: 0.750; 95% CI 0.699-0.800, p < 0.001). The patients were stratified into four risk groups: (1) low, 0-3 points, mortality rate: 1.5%; (2) moderate, 4-6 points, mortality rate: 10.5%; (3) high, 7-8 points, mortality rate: 28.6%; and (4) very high, ≥ 9 points, mortality rate: 65.5%.
CONCLUSION: The new scoring system for bacteremia could facilitate the prediction of the risk of 28-day mortality for patients visiting the ED with BSI.
Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bacteremia; Bloodstream infection; Mortality; Pitt bacteremia score predictive model

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23968756     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmii.2013.06.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Microbiol Immunol Infect        ISSN: 1684-1182            Impact factor:   4.399


  8 in total

1.  Results from a 13-Year Prospective Cohort Study Show Increased Mortality Associated with Bloodstream Infections Caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa Compared to Other Bacteria.

Authors:  Joshua T Thaden; Lawrence P Park; Stacey A Maskarinec; Felicia Ruffin; Vance G Fowler; David van Duin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Predicting emergency departments visit rates from septicemia in Taiwan using an age-period-cohort model, 1998 to 2012.

Authors:  I-Shiang Tzeng; Su-Hsun Liu; Yu Ting Chiou; Chien-Hsiung Huang; Cheng-Jung Lee; Cheng-Yu Chien; Shou-Chien Hsu; Yi-Ming Weng; Kuan-Fu Chen; Jih-Chang Chen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.889

3.  Beneficial effects of early empirical administration of appropriate antimicrobials on survival and defervescence in adults with community-onset bacteremia.

Authors:  Ching-Chi Lee; Chung-Hsun Lee; Chao-Yung Yang; Chih-Chia Hsieh; Hung-Jen Tang; Wen-Chien Ko
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 9.097

4.  Trend and Predictors of Short-term Mortality of Adult Bacteremia at Emergency Departments: A 14-Year Cohort Study of 14 625 Patients.

Authors:  Hsiu-Yin Chiang; Tsung-Chia Chen; Che-Chen Lin; Lu-Ching Ho; Chin-Chi Kuo; Chih-Yu Chi
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 3.835

5.  Red cell distribution width and early mortality in elderly patients with severe sepsis and septic shock.

Authors:  Sejin Kim; Kyoungmi Lee; Inbyung Kim; Siyoung Jung; Moon-Jung Kim
Journal:  Clin Exp Emerg Med       Date:  2015-09-30

6.  Evaluation of prognostic scoring systems in liver cirrhosis patients with bloodstream infection.

Authors:  Hong Zhao; Xiuling Gu; Ruihong Zhao; Yu Shi; Jifang Sheng
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.817

7.  Clinical importance of preoperative red-cell volume distribution width as a prognostic marker in patients undergoing radical surgery for pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Chao Dang; Min Wang; Tingting Qin; Renyi Qin
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 2.549

8.  Can We Reduce Negative Blood Cultures With Clinical Scores and Blood Markers? Results From an Observational Cohort Study.

Authors:  Svenja Laukemann; Nina Kasper; Prasad Kulkarni; Deborah Steiner; Anna Christina Rast; Alexander Kutz; Susan Felder; Sebastian Haubitz; Lukas Faessler; Andreas Huber; Christoph A Fux; Beat Mueller; Philipp Schuetz
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.817

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.