Literature DB >> 23968628

The effect of cigarette plain packaging on individuals' health warning recall.

Mohammed Al-Hamdani1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine the extent to which increasingly plainer packaging might increase recall of health warnings.
DESIGN: A 4 (pack ID levels) x 2 (smoking status: smokers and non-smokers) between-subjects design in which participants were randomly assigned to view one package. SAMPLE: Two hundred and twenty students from three universities in Nova Scotia, Canada, participated in the survey. MEASURES: Participants were asked to recall the health warning on their package. ANALYSIS: A sequential binary logistic regression test to examine whether plain packaging and/or smoking status affects health warning recall.
RESULTS: The odds of recalling the correct health warnings were significantly higher for the two plainest packages relative to the original package. The odds of recalling the correct health warning were also higher for non-smokers relative to smokers.
CONCLUSIONS: The results provide compelling evidence that health warnings on plain packages can be more easily recalled.
Copyright © 2013 Longwoods Publishing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23968628      PMCID: PMC3999559     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Healthc Policy        ISSN: 1715-6572


  10 in total

1.  The effect of plain packaging on response to health warnings.

Authors:  M E Goldberg; J Liefeld; J Madill; H Vredenburg
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Adolescents' perceptions of cigarette brand image: does plain packaging make a difference?

Authors:  Daniella Germain; Melanie A Wakefield; Sarah J Durkin
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 5.012

3.  Effects of dissuasive packaging on young adult smokers.

Authors:  Janet Hoek; Christiane Wong; Philip Gendall; Jordan Louviere; Karen Cong
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  The epidemiologist's responsibilities to study participants.

Authors:  M Feinleib
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  Plain packaging increases visual attention to health warnings on cigarette packs in non-smokers and weekly smokers but not daily smokers.

Authors:  Marcus R Munafò; Nicole Roberts; Linda Bauld; Ute Leonards
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 6.526

Review 6.  Health warning messages on tobacco products: a review.

Authors:  David Hammond
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 7.552

7.  The effect of plain packages on the perception of cigarette health warnings.

Authors:  P Beede; R Lawson
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 2.427

8.  Visual attention to health warnings on plain tobacco packaging in adolescent smokers and non-smokers.

Authors:  Olivia M Maynard; Marcus R Munafò; Ute Leonards
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 6.526

Review 9.  The case for the plain packaging of tobacco products.

Authors:  Becky Freeman; Simon Chapman; Matthew Rimmer
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 6.526

10.  How does increasingly plainer cigarette packaging influence adult smokers' perceptions about brand image? An experimental study.

Authors:  M A Wakefield; D Germain; S J Durkin
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 7.552

  10 in total
  8 in total

1.  Analysis of the Paternalistic Justification of an Agenda Setting Public Health Policy: The Case of Tobacco Plain Packaging.

Authors:  Thomas Boysen Anker
Journal:  Public Health Ethics       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 1.940

2.  Smokers' reactions to the new larger health warning labels on plain cigarette packs in Australia: findings from the ITC Australia project.

Authors:  Hua-Hie Yong; Ron Borland; David Hammond; James F Thrasher; K Michael Cummings; Geoffrey T Fong
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 3.  Tobacco packaging design for reducing tobacco use.

Authors:  Ann McNeill; Shannon Gravely; Sara C Hitchman; Linda Bauld; David Hammond; Jamie Hartmann-Boyce
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-27

4.  Effects of pictorial warning label message framing and standardized packaging on cigarette packaging appeal among young adult smokers.

Authors:  Andrea C Johnson; George Luta; Kenneth P Tercyak; Raymond S Niaura; Darren Mays
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 4.591

5.  Are quitting-related cognitions and behaviours predicted by proximal responses to plain packaging with larger health warnings? Findings from a national cohort study with Australian adult smokers.

Authors:  Emily Brennan; Sarah Durkin; Kerri Coomber; Meghan Zacher; Michelle Scollo; Melanie Wakefield
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 6.  Plain packaging of cigarettes: do we have sufficient evidence?

Authors:  Collin N Smith; John D Kraemer; Andrea C Johnson; Darren Mays
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2015-04-02

Review 7.  Using Neuroscience to Inform Tobacco Control Policy.

Authors:  Olivia M Maynard; F Joseph McClernon; Jason A Oliver; Marcus R Munafò
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 4.244

Review 8.  Perceptions and impact of plain packaging of tobacco products in low and middle income countries, middle to upper income countries and low-income settings in high-income countries: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Nicole Hughes; Monika Arora; Nathan Grills
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 2.692

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.