PURPOSE: To measure patients' assessment of chronic illness care and its variation across primary healthcare (PHC) models. METHODS: We recruited 776 patients with diabetes, heart failure, arthritis or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease from 33 PHC clinics. Face-to-face interviews, followed by a telephone interview at 12 months, were conducted using the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC). Multilevel regression was used in the analysis. RESULTS: The mean PACIC score was low at 2.5 on a scale of 1 to 5. PACIC scores were highest among patients affiliated with family medicine groups (mean, 2.78) and lowest for contact models (mean, 2.35). Patients with arthritis and older persons generally reported a lower assessment of chronic care. CONCLUSION: Family medicine groups represent an integrated model of PHC associated with higher levels of achievement in chronic care. Variations across PHC organizations suggest that some models are more appropriate for improving management of chronic illness.
PURPOSE: To measure patients' assessment of chronic illness care and its variation across primary healthcare (PHC) models. METHODS: We recruited 776 patients with diabetes, heart failure, arthritis or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease from 33 PHC clinics. Face-to-face interviews, followed by a telephone interview at 12 months, were conducted using the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC). Multilevel regression was used in the analysis. RESULTS: The mean PACIC score was low at 2.5 on a scale of 1 to 5. PACIC scores were highest among patients affiliated with family medicine groups (mean, 2.78) and lowest for contact models (mean, 2.35). Patients with arthritis and older persons generally reported a lower assessment of chronic care. CONCLUSION: Family medicine groups represent an integrated model of PHC associated with higher levels of achievement in chronic care. Variations across PHC organizations suggest that some models are more appropriate for improving management of chronic illness.
Authors: Russell E Glasgow; Edward H Wagner; Judith Schaefer; Lisa D Mahoney; Robert J Reid; Sarah M Greene Journal: Med Care Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Grant M Russell; Simone Dahrouge; William Hogg; Robert Geneau; Laura Muldoon; Meltem Tuna Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2009 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Julie Schmittdiel; David M Mosen; Russell E Glasgow; Judith Hibbard; Carol Remmers; Jim Bellows Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2007-11-21 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Dorothy Y Hung; Russell E Glasgow; L Miriam Dickinson; Desireé B Froshaug; Douglas H Fernald; Bijal A Balasubramanian; Larry A Green Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Benjamin F Crabtree; William L Miller; Jane M Gunn; William E Hogg; Cathie M Scott; Jean-Frederic Levesque; Mark F Harris; Sabrina M Chase; Jenny R Advocat; Lisa M Halma; Grant M Russell Journal: Fam Pract Date: 2018-05-23 Impact factor: 2.267
Authors: Amédé Gogovor; Regina Visca; Mark A Ware; Marie-France Valois; Gillian Bartlett; Matthew Hunt; Sara Ahmed Journal: J Pain Res Date: 2019-11-27 Impact factor: 3.133
Authors: Juliana J Petersen; Michael A Paulitsch; Karola Mergenthal; Jochen Gensichen; Heike Hansen; Siegfried Weyerer; Steffi G Riedel-Heller; Angela Fuchs; Wolfgang Maier; Horst Bickel; Hans-Helmut König; Birgitt Wiese; Hendrik van den Bussche; Martin Scherer; Anne Dahlhaus Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2014-08-07 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Mark F Harris; Jenny Advocat; Benjamin F Crabtree; Jean-Frederic Levesque; William L Miller; Jane M Gunn; William Hogg; Cathie M Scott; Sabrina M Chase; Lisa Halma; Grant M Russell Journal: J Multidiscip Healthc Date: 2016-01-29