Literature DB >> 23968057

Acoustic detection probability of bottlenose dolphins, Tursiops truncatus, with static acoustic dataloggers in Cardigan Bay, Wales.

Hanna K Nuuttila1, Len Thomas, Jan G Hiddink, Rhiannon Meier, John R Turner, James D Bennell, Nick J C Tregenza, Peter G H Evans.   

Abstract

Acoustic dataloggers are used for monitoring the occurrence of cetaceans and can aid in fulfilling statutory monitoring requirements of protected species. Although useful for long-term monitoring, their spatial coverage is restricted, and for many devices the effective detection distance is not specified. A generalized additive mixed model (GAMM) was used to investigate the effects of (1) distance from datalogger, (2) animal behavior (feeding and traveling), and (3) group size on the detection probability of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) with autonomous dataloggers (C-PODs) validated with visual observations. The average probability of acoustic detection for minutes with a sighting was 0.59 and the maximum detection distance ranged from 1343-1779 m. Minutes with feeding activity had higher acoustic detection rates and longer average effective detection radius (EDR) than traveling ones. The detection probability for single dolphins was significantly higher than for groups, indicating that their acoustic behavior may differ from those of larger groups in the area, making them more detectable. The C-POD is effective at detecting dolphin presence but the effects of behavior and group size on detectability create challenges for estimating density from detections as higher detection rate of feeding dolphins could yield erroneously high density estimates in feeding areas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23968057     DOI: 10.1121/1.4816586

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  4 in total

1.  Don't forget the porpoise: acoustic monitoring reveals fine scale temporal variation between bottlenose dolphin and harbour porpoise in Cardigan Bay SAC.

Authors:  Hanna K Nuuttila; Winnie Courtene-Jones; Sarah Baulch; Malene Simon; Peter G H Evans
Journal:  Mar Biol       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 2.573

2.  Fine scale spatial variability in the influence of environmental cycles on the occurrence of dolphins at coastal sites.

Authors:  Oihane Fernandez-Betelu; Isla M Graham; Thomas Cornulier; Paul M Thompson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Spatial and Temporal Variations in the Occurrence and Foraging Activity of Coastal Dolphins in Menai Bay, Zanzibar, Tanzania.

Authors:  Andrew J Temple; Nick Tregenza; Omar A Amir; Narriman Jiddawi; Per Berggren
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Effects of intense storm events on dolphin occurrence and foraging behavior.

Authors:  Amber D Fandel; A Garrod; A L Hoover; J E Wingfield; V Lyubchich; D H Secor; K B Hodge; A N Rice; H Bailey
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.