Literature DB >> 23967584

Harvesting tree biomass at the stand level to assess the accuracy of field and airborne biomass estimation in savannas.

Matthew S Colgan1, Gregory P Asner, Tony Swemmer.   

Abstract

Tree biomass is an integrated measure of net growth and is critical for understanding, monitoring, and modeling ecosystem functions. Despite the importance of accurately measuring tree biomass, several fundamental barriers preclude direct measurement at large spatial scales, including the facts that trees must be felled to be weighed and that even modestly sized trees are challenging to maneuver once felled. Allometric methods allow for estimation of tree mass using structural characteristics, such as trunk diameter. Savanna trees present additional challenges, including limited available allometry and a prevalence of multiple stems per individual. Here we collected airborne lidar data over a semiarid savanna adjacent to the Kruger National Park, South Africa, and then harvested and weighed woody plant biomass at the plot scale to provide a standard against which field and airborne estimation methods could be compared. For an existing airborne lidar method, we found that half of the total error was due to averaging canopy height at the plot scale. This error was eliminated by instead measuring maximum height and crown area of individual trees from lidar data using an object-based method to identify individual tree crowns and estimate their biomass. The best object-based model approached the accuracy of field allometry at both the tree and plot levels, and it more than doubled the accuracy compared to existing airborne methods (17% vs. 44% deviation from harvested biomass). Allometric error accounted for less than one-third of the total residual error in airborne biomass estimates at the plot scale when using allometry with low bias. Airborne methods also gave more accurate predictions at the plot level than did field methods based on diameter-only allometry. These results provide a novel comparison of field and airborne biomass estimates using harvested plots and advance the role of lidar remote sensing in savanna ecosystems.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23967584     DOI: 10.1890/12-0922.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  8 in total

1.  Limited increases in savanna carbon stocks over decades of fire suppression.

Authors:  Yong Zhou; Jenia Singh; John R Butnor; Corli Coetsee; Peter B Boucher; Madelon F Case; Evan G Hockridge; Andrew B Davies; A Carla Staver
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Biomass Increases Go under Cover: Woody Vegetation Dynamics in South African Rangelands.

Authors:  Penelope J Mograbi; Barend F N Erasmus; E T F Witkowski; Gregory P Asner; Konrad J Wessels; Renaud Mathieu; David E Knapp; Roberta E Martin; Russell Main
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  A tale of two "forests": random forest machine learning AIDS tropical forest carbon mapping.

Authors:  Joseph Mascaro; Gregory P Asner; David E Knapp; Ty Kennedy-Bowdoin; Roberta E Martin; Christopher Anderson; Mark Higgins; K Dana Chadwick
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Intra-and-inter species biomass prediction in a plantation forest: testing the utility of high spatial resolution spaceborne multispectral RapidEye sensor and advanced machine learning algorithms.

Authors:  Timothy Dube; Onisimo Mutanga; Adam Elhadi; Riyad Ismail
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  These are the days of lasers in the jungle.

Authors:  Joseph Mascaro; Gregory P Asner; Stuart Davies; Alex Dehgan; Sassan Saatchi
Journal:  Carbon Balance Manag       Date:  2014-09-03

6.  Tree-centric mapping of forest carbon density from airborne laser scanning and hyperspectral data.

Authors:  Michele Dalponte; David A Coomes
Journal:  Methods Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-05-14       Impact factor: 7.781

7.  Allometric equations for integrating remote sensing imagery into forest monitoring programmes.

Authors:  Tommaso Jucker; John Caspersen; Jérôme Chave; Cécile Antin; Nicolas Barbier; Frans Bongers; Michele Dalponte; Karin Y van Ewijk; David I Forrester; Matthias Haeni; Steven I Higgins; Robert J Holdaway; Yoshiko Iida; Craig Lorimer; Peter L Marshall; Stéphane Momo; Glenn R Moncrieff; Pierre Ploton; Lourens Poorter; Kassim Abd Rahman; Michael Schlund; Bonaventure Sonké; Frank J Sterck; Anna T Trugman; Vladimir A Usoltsev; Mark C Vanderwel; Peter Waldner; Beatrice M M Wedeux; Christian Wirth; Hannsjörg Wöll; Murray Woods; Wenhua Xiang; Niklaus E Zimmermann; David A Coomes
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 10.863

8.  Incorporating Canopy Cover for Airborne-Derived Assessments of Forest Biomass in the Tropical Forests of Cambodia.

Authors:  Minerva Singh; Damian Evans; David A Coomes; Daniel A Friess; Boun Suy Tan; Chan Samean Nin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 3.752

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.